Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 55, Issue 35, pp 3989–3997 | Cite as

What can false memory tell us about memory impairments in Alzheimer’s disease?

  • Fan Zhang
  • HaiYan GengEmail author
Review Psychology

Abstract

The range of memory impairments associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been a focus for psychological and clinical researchers for many years. In addition to investigations of AD patients’ veridical memory using traditional recognition memory tasks, a number of recent studies have focused on false memories to reveal the underlying causes of memory impairment in AD. Studies comparing illusory memories between AD patients and healthy older people have revealed various differences in memory deficits between the development of AD and the typical aging processes. Here, we review 3 types of memory illusions tested in AD patients: associative memory illusions, fluency-based false memories and source memory errors. By comparing AD patients with healthy older adults, we sought to analyze the mechanisms underlying AD-related memory impairments at different stages of memory processing, including encoding, retrieval and monitoring. This comparison revealed that AD patients exhibit an impaired ability to establish and utilize gist representations at the encoding stage and impairments in processing on the basis of familiarity and recollection at the retrieval stage. Consequently, patients with AD have access to less information when making memory judgments. As a result, they become more susceptible to the effects of item fluency, which can be manipulated during the retrieval stage. Furthermore, with impaired source memory monitoring abilities, the capacity of AD patients to suppress memory illusions is compromised. Based on these findings, we propose that the study of false memories constitute a critical tool for elucidating the memory impairments involved in AD. Further explorations of these memory impairments will have practical significance for the diagnosis and treatment of AD in the future.

Keywords

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) false memories associative memory illusions fluency effect source monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Turing E, Craik F I M. The Oxford Handbook of Memory: Memory in the Dementias. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 441–459Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev, 1980, 87: 252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yonelinas A P. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cognition, 1997, 25: 747–763Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curran T, Cleary A M. Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cogn Brain Res, 2003, 15: 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eichenbaum H, Yonelinas A P, Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2007, 30: 123–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yonelinas A P, Otten L J, Shaw K N, et al. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J Neurosci, 2005, 25: 3002–3008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simons J S, Owen A M, Fletcher P C, et al. Anterior Prefrontal cortex and the recollection of contextual information. Neuropsychologia, 2005, 43: 1774–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ally B A, Simons J S, McKeever J D, et al. Parietal contributions to recollection: Electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46: 1800–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prull M W, Dawes L C, Martin M III, et al. Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Adult age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Psychol Aging, 2006, 21: 107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westerberg C E, Paller K A, Weintraub S, et al. When memory does not fail: Familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 2006, 20: 193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hildebrandt H, Haldenwanger A, Eling P, et al. False recognition helps to distinguish patients with Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic MCI from patients with other kinds of dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2009, 620: 1–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris J C, Mohs R C, Rogers H, et al. Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull, 1988, 24: 641–644Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schacter D L, Addis D R. Constructive memory: The ghosts of past and future. Nature, 2007, 455: 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roediger H L, McDermott K B, Robinson K J, et al. The role of associative processes in creating false memories. In: Conway M A, Gathercole S E, Cornoldi C, eds. Theories of Memory. Hove: Psychological Press, 1998. 187–245Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verfaellie M, Schacter D L, Cook S P. The effect of retrieval instructions on false recognition: Exploring the nature of the gist memory impairment in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 2002, 40: 2360–2368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deese J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal instructions in immediate recall. J Exp Psychol, 1959, 58: 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roediger H L, McDermott K B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. J Exp Psychol-Learn Mem Cogn, 1995, 21: 803–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geng H Y, Qi Y Q, Li Y F, et al. Neurophysiological correlates of memory illusion in both encoding and retrieval phases. Brain Res, 2007, 1136: 154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dennis N A, Kimb H, Cabeza R. Effects of aging on true and false memory formation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45: 3157–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gallo D A, Shahid K R, Olson M A, et al. Overdependence on degraded gist memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 2006, 20: 625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Budson A E, Daffner K R, Desikan R, et al. Perceptual false recognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 2001, 15: 230–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Budson A E, Todman R W, Schacter D L. Gist memory in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence from categorized pictures. Neuropsychology, 2006, 20: 113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watson J M, Balota D A, Marshall S D. Semantic, phonological, and hybrid veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 2001, 15: 254–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Budson A E, Desikan R, Daffner K R, et al. When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 2000, 14: 277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ally B A, Budson A E. An evaluation of recollection and familiarity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using receiver operating characteristics. Brain Cogn, 2009, 69: 504–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jacoby L L, Whitehouse K. An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. J Exp Psychol-Gen, 1989, 118: 126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolk D A, Schacter D L, Berman A R, et al. An electrophysiological investigation of the relationship between conceptual fluency and familiarity. Neurosci Lett, 2004, 369: 150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kelley C M, Rhodes M G. Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In: Ross B H, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002. 293–320Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller J K, Lloyd M E, Westerman D L. When does modality matter? Perceptual versus conceptual fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. J Mem Lang, 2008, 58: 1080–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Whittlesea B W, Williams L D. The Discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. J Exp Psychol-Learn Mem Cogn, 2001, 27: 14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Anjali T, Westerman, D L. Aging and fluency-based illusions in recognition memory. Psychol Aging, 2009, 24: 595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Westerman D L, Lloyd M E, Miller J K. The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation. J Mem Lang, 2002, 47: 607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Westerman D L, Miller J K, Lloyd M E. Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Mem Cognit, 2003, 31: 619–629Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willems S, Germain S, Salmon E, et al. Patients with Alzheimer’s disease use metamemory to attenuate the Jacoby-Whitehouse Illusion. Neuropsychologia, 2009, 47: 2672–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wolk D A, Schacter D L, Berman A R. Patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease attribute conceptual fluency to prior experience. Neuropsychologia, 2005, 43: 1662–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wolk D A, Gold C A, Signoff E D, et al. Discrimination and reliance on conceptual fluency cues are inversely related in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 2009, 47: 1865–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gold C A, Marchant N L, Koutstaal W. Conceptual fluency at test shifts recognition response bias in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for increased false recognition. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45: 2791–2801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Budson A E, Sullivan A L, Mayer E, et al. Suppression of false recognition in Alzheimer’s disease and in patients with Frontal lobe lesion. Brain, 2002, 125: 2750–2765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson M K, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay D S. Source monitoring. Psychol Bull, 1993, 114: 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson M K, Raye C L. Reality monitoring. Psychol Rev, 1981, 88: 67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schacter D L, Israel L, Racine C. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic. J Mem Lang, 1999, 40: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gallo D A. Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. New York: Psychology Press, 2006. 190–195Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gallo D A, Bell D M, Beier J S, et al. Two types of recollectionbased monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the Distinctiveness Heuristic. Memory, 2006, 14: 730–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mitchell J P, Sullivan A L, Schacter D L, et al. Misattribution errors in Alzheimer’s disease: The illusory truth effect. Neuropsychology, 2006, 20: 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Budson A E, Sitarski J, Daffner K R, et al. False recognition of pictures versus words in Alzheimer’s disease: The distinctiveness heuristic. Neuropsychology, 2002, 16: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pierce B H, Waring J D, Schacter D L, et al. Effects of distinctive encoding on source-based false recognition, further examination of recall-to-reject processes in aging and AD. Cogn Behav Neurol, 2008, 21: 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ally B A, Waring J D, Beth E H, et al. Aging memory for pictures: Using igh-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect and the dynamics of recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46: 679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pierce B H, Sullivan A L, Schacter D L, et al. Comparing sourcebased and gist-based false recognition in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 2005, 19: 411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Skinner E I, Fernandes M A. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45: 2163–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang M, Geng H Y. The adaptive characteristics of memory: A perspective from the life-span development of associative memory illusion. Chinese Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 307–315Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mark W B, Jak A J, Delano-Wood L, et al. Neuropsychologi- cal contributions to the early identification of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Rev, 2008, 18: 73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Budson A E, Wolk D A, Chong H, et al. Episodic memory in Alzheimer’s disease: Separating response bias from discrimination. Neuropsychologia, 2006, 44: 2222–2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bartok J A, Wilson C S, Giordani B, et al. Varying patterns of verbal recall, recognition, and response bias with progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 1997, 4: 266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schacter D L. Searching for Memory: The brain, The Mind, and The Past. New York: Basic Books, 1996Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Masaru M. Memory impairment and awareness of memory deficits in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Tohoku J Exp Med, 2008, 215: 133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations