Skip to main content
Log in

LA-(MC)-ICPMS U-Pb zircon geochronology and Lu-Hf isotope compositions of the Taihua complex on the southern margin of the North China Craton

  • Article
  • Geochemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Widely distributed on the southern margin of the North China Craton, the Taihua complex extends roughly in an east-west direction and the relatively complete successions are found in Lushan County, Henan Province. Like many other Archean terranes, the Taihua Complex can be divided into two major lithological units along the Dangze River, namely gneisses series and supracrustal rocks. The former is located on the north side of the river and chiefly composed of TTG gneisses and amphibolites; the latter on the south side of the river is mainly supracrustal rock. Coupled with the previous studies, the results obtained by this study show that the Taihua complex was formed in a large time span from Neoarchean to Palaeoproterozoic. The TTG gneisses and amphibolites are dated at Neoarchean (2794–2752 Ma). The 2.9 Ga and 3.1 Ga zircons in amphibolites could be xenocrysts. In the North China Craton, the 2.8–2.7 Ga old rocks crop out in several areas e.g. western Shandong Province, Jiaodong Peninsula and Lushan area of Henan Province. In addition, 2.8–2.7 Ga detrital zircons or xenocryst zircons have been recognized in Huai’an, Fuping, Wutai areas of North China Craton and also reported in the Early Paleozoic diamondiferous kimberlites in Mengyin and Fuxian. All these age results indicate that the 2.8–2.7 Ga rocks may have been developed much broader region than today’s outcrops. Zircon Hf and whole rock Nd isotopes show that the 2.8–2.7 Ga tectono-thermal event represents an important period of crustal growth with minor ancient crust reworked in the North China Craton. However the formation of supracrustal rocks is limited to 2.2–2.0 Ga in the Palaeoproterozoic time, not the Archaean, as previously believed. Combined with the chronological data of aluminium-rich metamorphic rocks (Khondalite series) on the southern margin of the North China Craton and adjacent areas, it is suggested that the above areas have widely developed Paleoproterozoic passive continental margin environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu J S, Geng Y S, Shen Q H. Archaean Geology Characteristics and Tectonic Evolution of Sino-Korea Paleo-continent (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1998. 192–211

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhai M G, Bian A G, Zhao T P. The amalgamation of the supercontinent of North China Craton at the end of Neo-Archaean and its breakup during late Palaeoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2000, 43: 219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhai M G, Guo J H, Liu W J. Neoarchaean continental evolution and tectonic history of the North China Craton: A review. Asian Earth Sci, 2005, 24: 547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu F, Guo J H, Lu X P, et al. Crustal growth at ∼2.5 Ga in the North China Craton: Evidence from whole-rock Nd and zircon Hf isotopes in the Huai’an gneiss terrane. Chinese Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 4704–4713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu F Y, Zhao G C, Simon A. Nd isotopic constraints on crustal formation in the North China Craton. Asian Earth Sci, 2005, 24: 523–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang J, Gao S, Chen C, et al. Episodic crustal growth of North China as revealed by U-Pb age and Hf isotopes of detrital zircons from modern rivers. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2009, 73: 2660–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kröner A, Compston W, Zhang G W, et al. Age and tectonic setting of late Archaean greenstone-gneisses terrain in Henan Province, China, as revealed by single-grain zircon dating. Geology, 1988, 16: 211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Y, Yu Z P, Kröner A. Geochemistry and single zircon geochronology of Archaean TTG gneisses in the Taihua high-grade terrain, Lushan area, central China. J Southeast Asian Earth Sci, 1994, 10: 227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diwu C R, Sun Y, Lin C L, et al. Formation history of Archaean TTG gneisses in the Taihua complex, Lushan area, central China: in situ U-Pb age and Hf-isotope analysis of zircons. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2007, 71: A226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu D Y, Simon A, Wan Y, et al. Combined U-Pb, hafnium and oxygen isotope analysis of zircons from meta-igneous rocks in the southern North China Craton reveal multiple events in the Late Mesoarchean-Early Neoarchean. Chem Geol, 2008, 261: 140–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jahn B M, Auvray B, Shen Q H, et al. Archean crustal evolution in China: The Taishan Complex, and evidence for juvenile crustal addition from long-term depleted mantle. Precambrian Res, 1988, 38: 381–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wan Y S, Liu D Y, Wang S J, et al. ∼2.7 Ga juvenile crust formation in the North China Cration (Taishan-Xintai area, western Shandong Privince): Further evidence of an understated event from zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotope composition. Precambrian Res, 2010, in press

  13. Du L L, Yang C H, Zhuang Y X, et al. Hf Isotopic Composition of Zircon from ∼2.7 Ga Metamorphosed Sedimentary Rocks in Mengjiatun Formation Complex and TTG Gneiss, Xintai of Western Shandong Province. Acta Geol Sin. 2010, in press

  14. Jahn B M, Liu D Y, Wan Y S, et al. Archean crustal evolution of the Jiaodong Peninsula, China, as revealed by zircon SHRIMP geochronology, elemental and Nd-isotope geochemistry. Am J Sci, 2008, 308: 232–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Condie K C. Episodic continental growth and supercontinents: A mantle avalanche connection? Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1998, 163: 97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Condie K C. Episodic continental growth models: Afterthoughts and extensions. Tectonophysics, 2000, 322: 153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill C, Lenardic A, Moresi A L, et al. Episodic Precambrian subduction. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2007, 263: 552–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wan Y S, Wilde S A, Liu D Y, et al. Further evidence for 1.85 Ga metamorphism in the Central Zone of the North China Craton: SHRIMP U-Pb dating of zircon from metamorphic rocks in the Lushan area, Henan Province. Gondwana Res, 2006, 9: 189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun Y. Petrochemical features of the early Precambrian metavolcanic series in the Lushan region, Henan (in Chinese). J NW Univ (Special Issue for Precambrian Geology), 1982, 31–43

  20. Sun Y. Polymetamorphism of the Taihua Group at the Lushan, Henan (in Chinese). J NW Univ (Special Issue for Precambrian Geology), 1982, 44–65

  21. Zhang G W, Zhou D W, Zhang T A, et al. Correlation of tectonic sequence of Dengfeng Group with Taihua Group in the central part of Henan (in Chinese). J NW Univ (Special Issue for Precambrian Geology), 1982, 1–10

  22. Sun Y. Rocks in the granulite facie of the Taihua Group at Lushan, Henan (in Chinese). J NW Univ, 1983, 1: 92–98

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang G W, Bai Y B, Sun Y, et al. composition and evolution of the archean crust in central Henan, china. Precambrian Res, 1985, 27: 7–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang G W, Yu Z P, Dong Y P. On Precambrian framework and evolution of Qinling belt (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2000, 16: 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  25. He Y H, Sun Y, Li H P, et al. Zircon U-Pb chronology of Longshan complex by LA-ICPMS and its geological significance (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2005, 21: 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun S, Zhang G W, Chen Z M. Precambrian evolution of the southern North China block (in Chinese). Beijng: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1985. 215

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wan Y S, Dong C Y, Wang W, et al. Archean Basement and a Proterozoic Collision Orogen in the Huoqiu Area at the Southeastern Margin of North China Craton: Evidence from Sensitive High Resolution Ion Micro-probe U-Pb Zircon Geochronology. Acta Petrol Sin, 2009, 83: 801–840

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ludwig K R. Isoplot 3.0-A geochronological toolkit for Micro-soft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center, Spec Pub, 2003, 4: 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiedenbeck M, Alle P, Griffin W L, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand Newsl, 1995, 19: 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon E J, Norman J P, William L G, et al. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in-situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Chem Geol, 2004, 211: 47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chu N C, Taylor R N, Chavagnac V, et al. Hf isotope ratio analysis using multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: An evaluation of isobaric interference corrections. J Anal At Spectrom, 2002, 17: 1567–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu F Y, Yang Y H, Xie L W, et al. Hf isotopic compositions of the standard zircons and baddeleyites used in U-Pb geochronology. Chem Geol, 2006, 234: 105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elhlou S, Belousova E, Griffin W L, et al. Trace element and isotopic composition of GJ red zircon standard by laser ablation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2006, 70(Suppl 1): A158, doi:10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blichert-Toft J, Albarede F. The Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle-crust system. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1997, 148: 243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vervoort J D, Blichert-Toft J. Evolution of the depleted mantle; Hf isotope evidence from juvenile rocks through time. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1999, 63: 533–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amelin Y, Lee D C, Halliday A N. Early-middle archaean crustal evolution deduced from Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotopic studies of single zircon grains. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2000, 64: 420–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Andersen T. Detrital zircons as tracers of sedimentary provenance: Limiting conditions from statistics and numerical simulation. Chem Geol, 2005, 216: 249–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu Y B, Zheng Y F. Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U-Pb age. Chinese Sci Bull, 2004, 49: 1554–1569

    Google Scholar 

  39. Belousova E A, Griffin WL, O’Reilly S Y, et al. Igneous zircon: trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib Mineral Petrol, 2002, 143: 602–622

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hoskin P W O, Schaltegger U. The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis. Rev Mineral Geochem, 2003, 53: 27–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vavra G, Schmid R, Gebauer D. Internal morphology, habit and U-Th-Pb microanalysis of amphibolite-togranulitefacies zircons: Geochronology of the Ivrea zone (Southern Alps). Contrib Mineral Petrol, 1999, 134: 380–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peng P, Zhai M G. Two major Precambrian geological events of North China Block: Characteristics and property (in Chinese). Adv Earth Sci, 2002, 1706: 818–825

    Google Scholar 

  43. Geng Y S, Wan Y S, Shen Q H. Early Precambrian basic volcanism and crustal growth in the North China Craton (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin, 2002, 76: 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao G C, Wilde S A, Cawood P A, et al. Archean blocks and their boundaries in the North China Craton lithological, geochemical, structural and P-T path constraints and tectonic evolution. Precambrian Res, 2001, 107: 45–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao G C, Sun M. Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: Key issues revisited. Precambrian Res, 2005, 136: 177–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao G C, Wilde S A, Cawood P A, et al. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages of the Fuping complex: Implications for late Archean to Paleoproterozoic accretion and assembly of the North China Craton. Am J Sci, 2002, 302: 191–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kröner A, Wilde S A, Li J H, et al. Age and evolution of late Archean to Paleoproterozoic upper to lower crustal section in the Wutaishan/Hengshan/Fuping terrain of northern China. J Asian Earth Sci, 2005, 24: 577–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Griffin W L, Pearson N J, Belousova E, et al. The Hf isotope composition of cratonic mantle: LAM-MC-ICPMS analysis of zircon megacrysts in kimberlites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2000, 64: 133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu F Y, Li X H, Zheng Y F, et al. Lu-Hf isotopic systematics and their applications in petrology (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2007, 23: 185–220

    Google Scholar 

  50. Polat A, Li J H, Fryer B, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the Neoarchean (2800−2700 Ma) Taishan greenstone belt, North China Craton: Evidence for plume-craton interaction. Chem Geol, 2006, 230: 60–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cao G Q. Early Precambrian Geology of Western Shandong (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1996. 1–210

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zheng J P, Griffin W L, O’Reilly S Y, et al. U-Pb and Hf isotope analysis of zircons in mafic xenoliths from Fuxian kimberlites: Evolution of the lower crust beneath the North China Craton. Contrib Mineral Petrol, 2004, 148: 79–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng J P, Griffin W L, O’Reilly S Y, et al. Neoarchean (2.7–2.8 Ga) accretion beneath the North China Craton: U-Pb age, trace elements and Hf isotopes of zircons in diamondiferous kimberlites. Lithos, 2009, 112: 188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zheng Y F, Zhao Z F, Wu Y B et al. Zircon U-Pb age, Hf and O isotope constraints on protolith origin of ultrahigh-pressure eclogite and gneiss in Dabie orogen. Chem Geol, 2006, 231: 135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zheng Y F, Chen R X, Zhang S B, et al. Zircon Lu-Hf isotope study of ultrahigh-pressure eclogite and granitic gneisses in the Dabie orogen (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2007, 23: 317–330

    Google Scholar 

  56. Griffin W L, Belousova, E B, Begg G C, et al. Growth of continental crust from the Archean to now. International Discussion Meeting on Continental Geology and Tectonics, Xi’an, 2009, 4–5

  57. Qian X L, Li J H. The discovery of Neoarchean unconformity and its implication for continental cratonization of the North China Craton. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 1999, 42: 401–407

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lu L Z, Xu X C, Liu F L. The Precambrian khondalite series in the north of China (in Chinese), Changchun: Changchun Publishing House, 1995. 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  59. Li J H, Qian X L, Liu S W. Geochemical characteristics of khondalite series in middle part of North China Craton: implications for continental cratonization. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 1999, 29: 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wan Y S, Song B, Liu D Y, et al. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology of Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the North China Craton: Evidence for a major Late Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal event. Precambrian Res, 2006, 149: 249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhai M G. High-T and high-P granulites in the North China Craton: Their genetic relation and geotectonic implication (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2009, 25: 1753–1771

    Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao G C. Metamorphic evolution of major tectonic units in the basement of the North China Craton: Kay issues and discussion (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin, 2009, 25: 1772–1792

    Google Scholar 

  63. Diwu C R, Sun Y, Hong L Y, et al. U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes for detrital zircons from quartzite in the Paleoproterozoic Songshan Group on the southwestern margin of the North China Craton. Chinese Sci Bull, 2008, 18: 2828–2839

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChunRong Diwu.

About this article

Cite this article

Diwu, C., Sun, Y., Lin, C. et al. LA-(MC)-ICPMS U-Pb zircon geochronology and Lu-Hf isotope compositions of the Taihua complex on the southern margin of the North China Craton. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 2557–2571 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3273-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3273-6

Keywords

Navigation