Abstract
The distribution properties of the magnetic field in magnetotail current sheets have been explored statistically with the magnetic measurement data of the Cluster mission from June to November of the years 2001–2005. It is found that, on average, the strength of the magnetic field and its B z component in the current sheet are weaker in the region close to midnight but stronger near the dawnside and duskside flanks, which implies that, in general, a thinner current sheet occurs near midnight and thicker ones near both flanks. The occurrence of tail current sheet flapping is higher on both flanks than in the midnight region, although it is most frequent in the dawn flank. Current sheets with a negative B z component or a strong B y component have a higher probability of occurring at magnetic local times of 21:00–01:00, indicating that magnetic activity, e.g. magnetic reconnection and current disruption occur more frequently there. Statistically, the probability distributions of the B y component and the tilt angle of magnetic field lines in the current sheet are approximately normal distributions, and the occurrence probability of the flattened current sheet is about one third that of the normal current sheet. The magnetic field and B z component in the current sheet mainly vary from 1 nT to 10 nT. The B y component in the tail central current sheet is on average twice the IMF B y at 1 AU.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ness N F. The Earth’s magnetic tail. J Geophys Res, 1965, 70: 2989–3005
Baumjohann W, Paschmann G, Cattell C A. Average plasma properties in the central plasma sheet. J Geophys Res, 1989, 94:6597–6606
Baker D N, Klimas A J, Vassiliadis D, et al. Re-examination of driven and unloading aspects of magnetospheric substorms. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 7169–7177
Fairfield D H. A statistical determination of the shape and the position of the geomagnetic neutral sheet. J Geophys Res, 1980, 85: 775–780
Tsyganenko N A, Fairfield D H. Global shape of the magnetotail current sheet as derived from Geotail and Polar data. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: A03218
Huang C Y, Frank L A. A Statistical Survey of the Central Plasma Sheet. J Geophys Res, 1994, 99: 83–95
Fairfield D H. On the average configuration of the geomagnetic tail. J Geophys Res, 1979, 84:1950–1958
Sibeck D G, Siscoe G L, Slavin J A, et al. The distant magnetotail’s response to a strong interplanetary magnetic field By-Twisting, flattening, and field line bending. J Geophys Res, 1985, 90: 4011–4019
Kaymaz Z, Siscoe G L, Luhmann J G, et al. Interplanetary magnetic field control of magnetotail magnetic field geometry: IMP 8 observations. J Geophys Res, 1994, 99: 11113–11126
Escoubet C P, Fehringer M, Goldstein M. The Cluster mission. Ann Geophys, 2001, 19: 1197–1200
Shen C, Li X, Dunlop M W, et al. Analyses on the geometrical structure of magnetic field in the current sheet based on cluster measurements. J. Geophys. Res, 2003, 108: 1168–1181
Shen C, Liu Z X, Li X, et al. Flattened current sheet and its evolution in substorms. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A07S21
Petrukovich A A, Zhang T L, Baumjohann W, et al. Oscillations of flux tube slippage in the quiet plasma sheet, Ann Geophys, 2006, 24: 1695–1704
Shen C, Rong Z J, Li X, et al. Magnetic configurations of the tilted current sheets in magnetotail. Ann Geophys, 2008, 26: 3525–3543
Zhang T L, Baumjohann W, Nakamura R, et al. A wavy twisted neutral sheet observed by Cluster. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29: 1899–1902
Sergeev V A, Runov A, Baumjohann W, et al. Current sheet flapping motion and structure observed by Cluster. Geophys Res Lett, 2003, 30: 1327–1330
Sergeev V A, Runov A, Baumjohann W, et al. Orientation and propagation of current sheet oscillations. Geophys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L05807
Runov A, Sergeev V A, Baumjohann W, et al. Electric current and magnetic field geometry in flapping magnetotail current sheets. Ann Geophys, 2005, 23: 1391–1403
Petrukovich A A, Baumjohann W, Nakamura R, et al. Cluster vision of the magnetotail current sheet on a macroscale. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110: A06204
Balogh A, Carr C M, Acuña M H, et al. The Cluster magnetic field investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results. Ann Geophys, 2001, 19: 1207–1217
Smith C W, L’Heureux J, Ness N F, et al. The ACE magnetic fields experiment. Space Sci Rev, 1998, 86: 613–632
Lucek E A, Constantinescu D, Goldstein M L, et al. The magnetosheath. Space Sci Rev, 2005, 118: 95–152
Fujmoto M, Terasawa T, Mukai T. The lower-latitude boundary layer in the tail-flanks. In: Nishida A, Baker D N, Cowley S W H, eds. New Perspectives on the Earth’s Magnetotail. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 1998.33–44
Kaufmann R L, Ball B M, Paterson W R, et al. Plasma sheet thickness and electric currents. J Geophys Res, 2001, 106: 6179–6193.
Lui A T Y. Current disruption in the Earth’s magnetosphere: Observations and models. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 13067–13088
Lui A T Y. Characteristics of the cross-tail current in the Earth’s magnetosphere. In: Potemra T A, ed. Magnetosphere Currents. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 1984. 158–170
Sergeev V A. Penetration of the By component of the interplanetary magnetic field into the tail of the magnetosphere. Geomagn. Aerono, 1987, 27: 612–615
Hau L N, Erickson G M. Penetration of the interplanetary magnetic field By into Earth’s plasma sheet. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 21745–21751
Nakamura R, Baumjohann W, Fujimoto M, et al. Cluster observations of an ion-scale current sheet in the magnetotail under the presence of a guide field. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113: A07S16
Büchner J, Zelenyi L M. Regular and chaotic charged particle motion in magnetotaillike field reversals: 1. Basic theory of trapped motion. J Geophys Res, 1989, 94: 11821–11842
Liu Z X, Escoubet C P, Pu Z, et al. The Double Star Mission, Ann Geophys, 2005, 23: 2707–2712
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Rong, Z., Shen, C., Lucek, E. et al. Statistical survey on the magnetic field in magnetotail current sheets: Cluster observations. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 2542–2547 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3096-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-3096-5