Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 55, Issue 12, pp 1150–1156 | Cite as

Starch grain analysis reveals ancient diet at Kuahuqiao site, Zhejiang Province

  • XiaoYan Yang
  • LePing Jiang
Articles Geology

Abstract

Charred residues adhering to sherds of ceramic cooking vessels, pots (Fu), excavated from the Kuahuqiao site (8000–7000 cal a BP) in Zhejiang Province were examined using the method of starch grain analysis. Ancient starch grains were recovered from charred residues and were classified into 8 genera. Remains from rice (Oryza spp.), job’s-tears (Coix chinesis T.), bean (Vigna spp.), acorn (Quercus spp.) as well as possibly buckeye tree (Aesculus chinensis B.) were identified. Other starch grains from unidentified plants were also recovered. Tracheids with bordered pits from softwood fibers were also found, indicating that some food might have been processed with wooden tools. The range of starch grains in the charred residues adhering to the ceramic pots reveals the diversity of ancient plant foods at the Kuahuqiao site, Zhejiang Province.

Kewyords

starch grain analysis charred residues ancient diet Kuahuqiao site Zhejiang Province 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang Y M. Residues analysis and their employment in archaeology (in Chinese). Relics From South, 2008, 20–26Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Torrence R, Barton H. Ancient Starch Research. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 2006. 1–256Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perry L. Starch analysis reveal multiple functions of quarts “manioc” grater flakes from the Orinoco Basin, Venezuela. Interciencia, 2002, 27: 635–639Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perry L, Dickau R, Zarrillo S, et al. Starch fossils and the domestication and dispersal of chili peppers (Capsic µm spp. L.) in the Americas. Science, 2007, 315: 986–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piperno D R, Husum-Clary K, Cooke R G, et al. Preceramic maize from central Panama: Evidence from phytoliths and pollen. Am Anthropol, 1985, 87: 871–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Piperno D R, Holst I. The presence of starch grains on prehistoric stone tools from the humid Neotripics: Indications of early tuber use and agriculture in Panama. J Archaeol Sci, 1998, 25: 765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piperno D R, Ranere A J, Holst I, et al. Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest. Nature, 2000, 407: 894–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piperno D R, Weiss E, Holst I, et al. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature, 2004, 430: 670–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zarrillo S, Pearsall D M, Raymond J C, et al. Directly dated starch residues document early formative maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical Ecuador. Proc Nat Acad Sci, USA, 2008, 105: 5006–5011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu H Y, Yang X Y, Ye M L, et al. Millet noodles in Late Neolithic China. Nature, 2005, 437: 967–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tao D W, Yang Y M, Huang W D, et al. Ancient starch grains from artifacts at Diaolongbei site. Chin Archaeol, 2009, 92–96Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang X Y, Lü H Y, Liu T S, et al. Micromorphology characteristics of starch grains Setaria italica, Panicum miliaceum and S. viridis and its signification for archaeobotany (in Chinese). Quat Sci, 2005, 25: 224–227Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang X Y, Kong Z C, Liu C J, et al. Characteristics of starch grains from main nuts in North China (in Chinese). Quat Sci, 2005, 25: 224–227Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang X Y, Yi J C, Lü H Y, et al. Starch grain analysis reveals function of grinding stone tools at Shangzhai site, Beijing. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2009, 52:1164–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Xiaoshan Museum. Kuahuqiao Site (in Chinese). Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2004. 53–277Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horrocks M, Bedford S. Microfossil analysis of Lapita deposits in Vanuatu reveals introduced Araceae (aroids). Arch Ocean, 2004, 39: 67–74Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crowther A. Starch residues on undecorated Lapita pottery from Anir, New Ireland. Arch Oceania, 2005, 40: 62–66Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boyd M, Surette C, Nicholson B A. Archaeobotanical evidence of maize (Zea mays) consumption at the northern edge of the Great Plains. J Archaeol Sci, 2006, 33: 1129–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Henry A G, Hudson H F, Piperno D R. Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking. J Archaeol Sci, 2009, 36: 915–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watanabe M. Knowledge of the Jomon Period (in Japanese). Tokyo: Tokyo Art Press, 1983. 79–85Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu C J, Jin G Y, Kong Z C. Archaeobotany: Research on Seeds and Fruits (in Chinese). Beijng: Science Press, 2008. 160–201Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee G, Crawford G W, Liu L, et al. Plants and people from the early Neolithic to Shang period in North China. Proc Nat Acaed Sci, USA, 2007, 104: 1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dong Y C, Liu X. Crops and Their Wild Relatives in China, vol. Economic Crops (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press. 2007. 406–425Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hunan Provincial Museum, Institute of Archaeology of CAS. Tomb 1 of the Han Dynasty at Mawangdui, Changsha (in Chinese). Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 1973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and ArchaeologyHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations