Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of a substorm event by satellite observation and model simulation

  • Articles
  • Geophysics
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

A substorm event has been simulated for the first time by using SWMF (Space Weather Modeling Framework) developed by the University of Michigan. The model results have been validated using Geotail and Cluster satellite observations. The substorm onset occurs at 22:08 UT on September 28 2004, as identified from FUV WIC observations on the NASA IMAGE spacecraft. SWMF can couple effectively the magnetosphere, inner magnetosphere and ionosphere processes and is driven by the solar wind and IMF (Interplanetary Magnetic Field) parameters, which are measured by ACE satellite and time delayed to the upstream boundary of the model. It shows that (1) SWMF can predict well the large-scale variations of the magnetospheric magnetic field and ionospheric currents during the substorm event; and (2) the accuracy of the time delay of the solar wind from ACE to the outer boundary of the model has great effects on the model results. Finally, the substorm trigger mechanism has been discussed and the way of improvement of the model has been pointed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lui A T Y, Current disruption in the Earth’s magnetosphere: Observations and models. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 13067–13088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiokawa K, Baumjohann W, Haerendel G, et al. High-speed ion flow, substorm current wedge, and multiple Pi2 pulsations. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 4491–4507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker D N, Pulkkinen T I, Angelopoulos V, et al. Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view. J Geophys Res, 1996, 101: 12975–13010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pu Z Y, Kang K B, Korth A, et al. Ballooning instability in the presence of a plasma flow: A synthesis of tail reconnection and current disruption models for the initiation of substorms. J Geophys Res, 1999, 104: 10235–10248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Luehr H, Ma S Y, et al. Substorm onset dynamics in the magnetotail as derived from joint TC-1 and Cluster data analysis. Earth Planets Space, 2008, 60: 613–621

    Google Scholar 

  6. Toth G, Sokolov I V, Gombosi T I, et al. Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community. J Geophys Res, 2005, 110, doi:10.1029/2005JA011126

  7. Powell K G, Roe P L, Linde T J, et al. A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J Comp Phys, 1999, 154: 284–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Toffoletto F, Sazykin S, Spiro R, et al. Inner magnetospheric modeling with the Rice Convection Model. Space Sci Rev, 2003, 107: 175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ridley A J, Gombosi T I, DeZeeuw D L. Ionospheric control of the magnetosphere: Conductance. Ann Geophys, 2004, 22: 567–584

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Zeeuw D L, Sazykin S, Wolf R A, et al. Coupling of a global MHD code and an inner magnetospheric model: Initial results. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109, doi: 10.1029/2003JA010366

  11. Toth G, De Zeeuw D L, Gombosi T I. et al. Sun to thermosphere simulation of the 28–30 October 2003 storm with the Space Weather Modeling Framework. Space Weather, 2007, 5, doi: 10.1029/2006SW000272

  12. Wang H, Luehr H, Ridley A J, et al. Storm time dynamics of auroral electrojets: CHAMP observation and the Space Weather Modeling Framework simulation. Ann Geophys, 2008, 26: 555–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Ridley A J, Luehr H. Validation of the Space Weather Modeling Framework with CHAMP and DMSP satellite observations. Space Weather, 2008, 6, doi: 10.1029/2007SW000355

  14. Weimer D R, Ober D M, Maynard N C, et al. Variable time delays in the propagation of the interplanetary magnetic field. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107, doi: 10.1029/2001JA009102

  15. Cao J B, Ma Y D, Parks G, et al. Joint observations by Cluster satellites of bursty bulk flows in the magnetotail. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011322

  16. Lyons L R, Lee D Y, Wang C P, et al. Global auroral responses to abrupt solar wind changes: Dynamic pressure, substorm, and null events. J Geophys Res, 2005, n110, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011089

  17. Lyons L R, Blanchard G T, Samson J C, et al. Coordinated observations demonstrating external substorm triggering. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 27039–27051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fedder J A, Slinker S P, Lyon J G, et al. Global numerical simulation of the growth phase and the expansion onset for a substorm observed by viking. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 19083–19093

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShuYing Ma.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40604017) and the Open Project Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Space Weather of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Ma, S. & Ridley, A.J. Comparative study of a substorm event by satellite observation and model simulation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 857–864 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0282-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0282-4

Keywords

Navigation