Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-agent systems for simulating traffic behaviors

  • Articles
  • Geography
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Multi-agent systems allow the simulation of complex phenomena that cannot be easily described analytically. As an efficient tool, the agen t-oriented traffic models have emerged to investigate vehicular traffic behaviors. In this article, a new agent-based traffic simulation model is proposed for solving the traffic simulation problems. A vehicle with the driver is represented as a composite autonomous agent in this model. Different from the classical car-following principles, vehicle-agent moving approaches are proposed instead of particle-hopping techniques. This model defines reasonable acceleration and deceleration rates at any certain condition. In this simulation, this can offer a natural, even cognitive way to follow the leader and switch lane. The simulation results have verified that this model has achieved more realistic results without loss of accuracy than those obtained from the cellular automata traffic models. This model can provide better simulation performance than the traditional vehicle-following models which are used to investigate the nonequilibrium traffic flow. A comparison of the real flow with the simulated freeway flow and lane capacity highlights the validness of this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chowdhury D, Santen L, Schadschneider A. Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Phys Rep, 2000, 329: 199–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pipes L A. An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. J Appl Phys, 1953, 24: 274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gazis D C, Herman R, Potts R B. Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Oper Res, 1959, 7: 499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gazis D C, Herman R, Rothery R W. Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper Res, 1961, 9: 545–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Newell G F. A theory of platoon formation in tunnel traffic. Oper Res, 1959, 7: 589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Newell G F. Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following. Oper Res, 1961, 9: 209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edie L C. Car-following and steady-state theory for noncongested traffic. Oper Res, 1961, 9: 66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gipps P G. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transport Res B-Meth, 1981, 15: 105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, et al. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E, 1995, 51: 1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E, 2000, 62: 1805–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagel K. Particle hopping models and traffic flow theory. Phys Rev E, 1996, 53: 4655–4672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biham O, Middleton A A, Levine D. Self-organization and a dynamical transition in traffic-flow models. Phys Rev A, 1992, 46: 6124–6127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukui M, Ishibash Y. Traffic flow in 1D cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed. J Phys Soc Japan, 1996, 65: 1868–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreckenberg M. Cellular automation models and traffic flow. J Phys A, 1993, 26: 679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daganzo C F. In traffic flow, cellular automata = kinematic waves. Transport Res B-Meth, 2006, 40: 396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helbing D. Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev Mod Phys, 2001, 73: 1067–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang R, Wu Q S. Phase transition at an on-ramp in the Nagel-Schreckenberg traffic flow model. Physica A, 2006, 366: 523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun T, Wang J F. A traffic cellular automata model based on road network grids and its spatial and temporal resolution’s influences on simulation. Simul Model Pract Th, 2007, 15: 864–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagel K, Schreckenberg M. A Cellular Automaton Model for Free-way Traffic. J Phys I France, 1992, 2: 2221–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu F, Zhou C H, Wan Q. Implementation of a feature-based non-planar database for urban traffic networks (in Chinese). Acta Geod Cartogr Sinica, 2002, 31: 182–186

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bham G H, Benekohal R F. A high fidelity traffic simulation model based on cellular automata and car-following concepts. Transport Res C-Emer, 2004, 12: 1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wahle J, Bazzan A L C, Klugl F, et al. The impact of real-time information in a two-route scenario using agent-based simulation. Transport Res C-Emer, 2002, 10: 399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler J L, Satapathy G, Manikonda V, et al. A multi-agent approach to cooperative traffic management and route guidance. Transport Res B-Meth, 2005, 39: 297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cetin N, Nagel K, Raney B, et al. Large-scale multi-agent transportation simulations. Comput Phys Commun, 2002, 147: 559–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Balmer M, Axhausen K W, Nagel K. Agent-based demand-modeling framework for large-scale microsimulations. Transport Res Rec, 2006, 1985: 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernandez J Z, Ossowski S, Garcia-Serrano A. Multiagent architectures for intelligent traffic management systems. Transport Res C-Emer, 2002, 10: 473–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hidas P. Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving. Transport Res C-Emer, 2005, 13: 37–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bazzan A L C. A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents. Auton Agent Multi-Ag, 2005, 10: 131–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Davidsson P, Henesey L, Ramstedt L, et al. An analysis of agent-based approaches to transport logistics. Transport Res C-Emer. 2005, 13: 255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burmeister B, Doormann J, Matylis G. Agent-oriented traffic simulation. Trans Soc Comput Simul. 1997, 14: 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rossetti R J F, Bampi S, Liu R H, et al. An agent-based framework for the assessment of drivers’ decision-making. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2000 Proceedings, 2000 IEEE. Dearborn (MI), 2000. 387–392

  32. Dia H. An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transport Res C-Emer, 2002, 10: 331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ehlert P A, MRothkrantz L J M. Microscopic traffic simulation with reactive driving agents. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2001 Proceedings, 2001 IEEE. Oakland, 2001. 860–865

  34. Mandiau R, Champion A, Auberlet J M, et al. Behaviour based on decision matrices for a coordination between agents in a urban traffic simulation. Appl Intell, 2008, 28: 121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei Y, Han Y, Fan B. In Agent-oriented urban traffic micro simulation system. In: Industrial Technology, 2008 ICIT, 2008 IEEE International Conference on. Chengdu, 2008. 1–7

  36. Zhang F, Li J L, Zhao Q X. Single-lane traffic simulation with multi-agent system. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005 Proceedings, 2005 IEEE. Vienna, 2005. 1183–1187

  37. Treiterer J. Investigation of Traffic Dynamics by Aerial Photogrammetry Techniques. Final Report EES278. 1975

  38. Jula H, Kosmatopoulos E B, Ioannou P A. Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2000, 49: 2295–2308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chowdhury D, Wolf D E, Schreckenberg M. Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: Effects of lane-changing rules. Physica A, 1997, 235: 417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barlovic R, Esser J, Froese K, et al. Online traffic simulation with cellular automata. eds. Brilon W. In: Traffic and Mobility SimulationEconomics Environment. Berlin: Springer, 1999. 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  41. Naranjo J E, Gonzalez C, Reviejo J, et al. Adaptive fuzzy control for inter-vehicle gap keeping. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2003, 4: 132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aycin M F, Benekohal R F. Linear acceleration car-following model development and validation. Transport Res Rec, 1998, 1644: 10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Greenberg H. An analysis of traffic flow. Oper Res, 1959, 7: 79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huber M J. Effect of temporary bridge on parkway performance. Highw Res Board Bull, 1957, 167: 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  45. Drake J, Schofer J, May A D. A statistical analysis of speed-density hypotheses. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on theory of traffic flow. New York: Vehicular Traffic Science, Elsevier, 1967. 112–117

    Google Scholar 

  46. Underwood R T. Speed, Volume and Density Relationships. In: Quality and Theory of Traffic Flow. New Haven, Conn: Bureau of Highway Traffic, Yale University, 1961. 141–187

    Google Scholar 

  47. Greenshields B D, Bibbins J R, Channing W S, et al. A study of traffic capacity. Highw Res Board Proceedings. 1934, 14: 448–477

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wagner P. Traffic simulations using cellular automata: Comparison with reality. eds. Wolf D E, Schreckenberg M, Bachem A. In: Traffic and Granular Flow. Singapore: World Scientic, 1996. 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sasaki M, Nagatani T. Transition and saturation of traffic flow controlled by traffic lights. Physica A, 2003, 325: 531–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang D W, Huang W N. Traffic signal synchronization. Phys Rev E, 2003, 67: 056124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang R, Wu Q S. A stopped time dependent randomization cellular automata model for traffic flow controlled by traffic light. Physica A, 2006, 364: 493–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tomer E, Safonov L, Madar N, et al. Optimization of congested traffic by controlling stop-and-go waves. Phys Rev E, 2002, 65: 065101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiCai Dai.

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, J., Li, X. Multi-agent systems for simulating traffic behaviors. Chin. Sci. Bull. 55, 293–300 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0230-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0230-3

Keywords

Navigation