Abstract
High-reproducibility silicalite-1 membranes were synthesized on silica tubes by in-situ hydrothermal synthesis, and the relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) of average separation factor for eight membranes was only 7.5%. By using an effective method called “solution-filling (SF)”, the average flux of membranes prepared with SF method was improved by about 49% compared to membranes prepared without SF method, and the highest flux of membrane prepared with SF method towards ethanol/H2O mixture at 80 °C was 1.49 kg/(m2·h). Pervaporation experiments showed that the fluxes of silicalite-1 membranes at 60 °C were 2.63, 0.87, 0.24, and 0.20 kg/(m2·h) towards methanol/H2O, ethanol/H2O, 2-propanol/H2O, and 1-propanol/H2O mixtures, respectively, and the corresponding separation factors were 22, 69, 81, and159, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowen T C, Noble R D, Falconer J L. Fundamentals and applications of pervaporation through zeolite membrane. J Membr Sci, 2004, 245(1–2): 1–33
Sano T, Yanagishita H, Kiyozumi Y, et al. Separation of ethanol/water mixture by silicalite membrane on pervaporation. J Membr Sci, 1994, 95(3): 221–228
Holmes S M, Markert C, Plaisted R J, et al. A novel method for the growth of silicalite membranes on stainless steel supports. Chem Mater, 1999, 11(11): 3329–3332
Morigami Y, Kondo M, Abe J, et al. The first large-scale pervaporation plant using tubular-type module with zeolite NaA membrane. Sep Purif Technol, 2001, 25(1-3): 251–260
Nomura M, Bin T, Nakao S. Selective ethanol extraction from fermentation broth using a silicalite membrane. Sep Purif Technol, 2002, 27(1): 59–66
Matsusuda H, Yanagishita H, Negishi H. Improvement of ethanol selectivity of silicalite membrane in pervaporation by silicone rubber coating. J Membr Sci, 2002, 210(2): 433–437
Lin X, Kita H, Okamoto K. Silicalie membrane preparation, characterization, and separation performance. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2001, 40(19): 4069–4078
Van de Graaf J M, Van der Bijl E, Stol A, et al. Effect of operating conditions and membrane quality on the separation performance of composite silicalite-1 membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res, 1998, 37(10): 4071–4083
Noack M, Kolsch P, Schafer R, et al. Preparation of MFI membranes of enlarged area with high reproducibility. Micropor Mesopor Mater, 2002, 49(1–3): 25–37
Lin X, Kita H, Okamoto K. A novel method for the synthesis of high performance silicalite membranes. Chem Commun, 2000, 1889–1890
Gora L, Nishiyama N, Jansen J C. et al. Highly reproducible high-flux silicalite-1 membranes: optimization of silicalite-1 membrane preparation. Sep Purif Technol, 2001, 22–23(1): 223–229
Hedlund J, Sterte J, Anthonis M, et al. High-flux MFI membranes. Microp Mesop Mater, 2002, 52(3): 179–189
Nomura M, Yamaguchi T, Nakao S. Transport phenomena through intercrystalline and intracrystallline pathways of silicalite zeolite membranes. J Membr Sci, 2001, 187(1–2): 203–212
Chen H, Song C, Yang W. Effects of aging on the synthesis and performance of silicalite membranes on silica tubes without seeding. Micropor Mesopor Mater, 2007, 102(1–3): 249–257
Bowen T C, Kalipcilar H, Falconer J L, et al. Pervaporation of organics/water mixtures through B-ZSM-5 zeolite membranes on monolith supports. J Memb Sci, 2003, 215(1–2): 235–247
Lai Z, Bonilla G, Diaz I, et al. Micro-structural optimization of a zeolite membrane for organic vapor separation. Science, 2003, 300(18): 456–460
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Advanced Materials Committee of China (Grant No. 2003AA328010) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. G2003CB615802)
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, H., Li, Y., Zhu, G. et al. Synthesis and pervaporation performance of high-reproducibility silicalite-1 membranes. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 3505–3510 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0481-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0481-4