Chinese Science Bulletin

, 53:1708 | Cite as

Adaptation to salinity in mangroves: Implication on the evolution of salt-tolerance

  • Shan Liang
  • RenChao Zhou
  • SuiSui Dong
  • SuHua ShiEmail author
Progress Plant Ecology


A plant’s adaptation to its environment is one of the most important issues in evolutionary biology. Mangroves are trees that inhabit the intertidal zones with high salinity, while salt tolerance competence of different species varies. Even congeneric species usually occupy distinct positions of intertidal zones due to differential ability of salt tolerance. Some species have different ecotypes that adapt well to littoral and terrestrial environments, respectively. These characteristics of mangroves make them ideal ecological models to study adaptation of mangroves to salinity. Here, we briefly depict adaptive traits of salt tolerance in mangroves with respect to anatomy, physiology and biochemistry, and review the major advances recently made on both the genetic and genomic levels. Results from studies on individual genes or whole genomes of mangroves have confirmed conclusions drawn from studies on anatomy, physiology and biochemistry, and have further indicated that specific patterns of gene expression might contribute to adaptive evolution of mangroves under high salinity. By integrating all information from mangroves and performing comparisons among species of mangroves and non-mangroves, we could give a general picture of adaptation of mangroves to salinity, thus providing a new avenue for further studies on a molecular basis of adaptive evolution of mangroves.


mangroves salt stress adaptive evolution gene genome 


  1. 1.
    Tomlinson P B. The Botany of Mangrove. New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1986Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin P. A Review on the Mangrove Research in China. J Xiamen Univ (Natural Sci) (in Chinese), 2001, 40(2): 592–603Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang B S, Liang S C, Zhang W Y, et al. Mangrove Flora of the World. Acta Bot Sin, 2003, 45(6): 644–653Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mimura T, Kura-Hotta M, Tsujimura T, et al. Rapid increase of vacuolar volume in response to salt stress. Planta, 2003, 216: 397–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kura-Hotta M, Mimura M, Tsujimura T, et al. High salt treatment-induced Na+ extrusion and low salt treatment-induced Na+ accumulation in suspension-cultured cells of the mangrove plant, Bruguiera sexangula. Plant Cell Environ, 2001, 24: 1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao K F, Feng L T, Lu Y F, et al. The osmotica and their contributions to the osmotic adjustment for Kandelia Candel (L.) Druce and Avicennia matina (Forsk) Vierh growing in the Jiulongjiang river estuary. Oceanol Limnol Sin (in Chinese), 1999, 30(1): 57–61Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sobrado M A. Leaf characteristics and gas exchange of the mangrove Laguncularia racemosa as affected by salinity. Photosynthetica, 2005, 43(2): 217–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ye Y, Tam N F Y, Lu C Y, et al. Effects of salinity on germination, seedling growth and physiology of three salt-secreting mangrove species. Aquat Bot, 2005, 83: 193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng W J, Wang W Q, Lin P. Dynamics of element contents during the development of hypocotyls and leaves of certain mangrove species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 1999, 233: 248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang W Q, Ke L, Tam N F Y, et al. Change in the main osmotica during the development of Kandelis candel hypocotyls and after mature hypocotyls were transplanted in solutions with different salinities. Mar Biol, 2002, 141: 1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao H, Zheng W J, Sun J, et al. Dynamics of element levels and adaptation to saline environment during the development in Aegiceras corniculatum mangrove. Mar Sci (in Chinese), 2004, 28(9): 1–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takemura T, Hanagata N, Sugihara K, et al. Physiological and biochemical response to salt stress in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Aquat Bot, 2000, 68: 15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aziz I, Khan M A. Experimental assessment of salinity tolerance of Ceriops tagal seedlings and saplings from the Indus delta, Pakistan. Aquat Bot, 2001, (70): 259–268Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan M A, Aziz I. Salinity tolerance in some mangrove species from Pakistan. Wetl Ecol Manag, 2001, 9: 219–223Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suarez N, Medina E. Influence of salinity on Na+ and K+ accumulation, and gas exchange in Avicennia germinans. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44(2): 268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu J K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6: 441–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ru Q M, Zheng H L, Xiao Q. Advances in salt tolerance mechanism of mangrove. Acta Bot Yunnanica (in Chinese). 2006, 28(1): 78–84Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hibino T, Meng Y L, Kawamistu Y, et al. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of two kinds of betaine-2-aldehyde dehydrogenase in betain accumulating mangrove, Avicennia marina (Forsk) Vierh. Plant Mol Biol, 2001, 45(3): 353–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parida A K, Das A B, Das P. NaCl stress causes changes in photosynthetic pigments, proteins and other metabolic components in the leaves of a true mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora, in hydroponic cultures. Plant Biol, 2002, 45: 28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu X H, Huang Y L, Deng S L, et al. Construction of a SSH library of Aegiceras corniculatum under salt stress and expression analysis of four transcripts. Plant Sci, 2005, 169: 147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Datta P N, Ghose M. Estimation of osmotic potential and free amino acids in some mangroves of the Sundarbans, India. Acta Bot Croast, 2003, 62(1): 37–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Popp M, Larher F, Weigel P. Osmotic adaptation in Australian mangroces. Vegetatio, 1985, 61: 247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parida A K, Das A B, Sanada Y, et al. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aqua Bot, 2004, 80: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yasumoto E, Adachi K, Kato M, et al. Uptake of inorganic ions and compatibles solutes in culture mangrove cells during salt stress. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 1999, 35: 82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun W Q, Li X P, Ong B L. Preferential accumulation of D-pinitol in Acrostichum aureum gametophytes in response to salt stress. Physiol Plantarum, 1999, 105: 51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jithesh M N, Prashanth S R, Sicaprakash K R, et al. Monitoring expression profiles of antioxidant genes to salinity, iron, oxidative, light and hyperosmotic stress in the high salt tolerant grey mangrove, Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. by mRNA analysis. Plant Cell Rep, 2006, 25: 865–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang Y H, Wang W Q, Lin P. Growth and leaves membrane lipid peroxidation of Bruguiera gymnorrhiza (L.) Lamk. Seedlings under long and short-term salinity. Acta Hydrobiol Sin, 2004, 28(2): 186–190Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parida A K, Das A, Mohanty P. Investigations on the antioxidative defence responses to NaCl stress in a mangrove, Bruguiera parviflora: Differential regulations of isoforms of some antioxidative enzymes. Plant Growth Regul, 2004, 42: 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parida A K, Das A B, Sanada Y, et al. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquat Bot, 2004, 80: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mishra S, Das A B. Effect of NaCl on leaf salt secretion and antioxidative enzyme level in roots of a mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Indian J Exp Biol, 2003, (41): 160–166Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Waditee R, Hibino T, Tanaka Y, et al.. Functional characterization of Betaine/proline transporters in betaine accumulating mangrove. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 18373–18382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhou H T, Lin P. Extractoin of salt-tolerant cDNA in mangrove Avicennia marina by mRNA differential display. Chin J Biotech(in Chinese), 2002, 18(1): 51–54Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mehta P A, Sivaprakash K, Parani M, et al. Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the salt-tolerant mangrove species Avicennia marina (Forsh) Vierh. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 110: 416–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maurel C, Chrispeels M J. Aquaporins, a molecular entry into plant water relations. Plant Physiol, 2001, 125: 135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fu X H. Cloning and functional expression of salt tolerance related genes in Aegiceras corniculatum and their adaptive evolution analysis (in Chinese). Ph. D Thesis. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2006Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sugihara K, Hanagata N, Dubinsky Z, et al. Molecular characterization of cDNA encoding oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 increased by salt treatment in the mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Plant Cell Physiol, 2000; (41): 1279–1285Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miyama M, Shimizu H, Sugiyama M, Hanagata N. Sequencing and analysis of 14, 842 expressed sequence tags of burma mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Plant Sci, 2006, 171: 234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miyama M, Hanagata N. Microarray analysis of 7029 gene expression patterns in burma mangrove under high-salinity stress. Plant Sci, 2007, 172(5): 948–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Banzai T, Hershkovits G, Katocoff D J, Hanagata N, et al. Identification and characterization of mRNA transcripts differentially expressed in response to high salinity by means of differential display in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Plant Sci, 2002, 162: 499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Banzai T, Sumiya K, Hanagata N, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of genes encoding BURP domain-containing protein in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Trees. 2002, 16: 87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Banzai T, Hanagata N, Dubinsky Z, et al. Fructose-2, 6-bisphosphate contents were increased in response to salt, water and osmotic stress in leaves of Bruguiera gymnorrhiza by differential changes in the activity of the bifunctional enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphate 2-phosphatase. Plant Mol Biol, 2003, 53: 51–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Takemura T, Hanagata N, Dubinsky Z, et al. Molecular characterization and response to salt stress of mRNAs encoding cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and catalase from Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Trees, 2002, 16: 94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yamada A, Saitoh T, Mimura T, et al. Expression of mangrove allene oxide cyclase enhances salt tolerance in Escherichia coli, yeast, and tobacco cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43: 903–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liang S. Transcript profile of Ceriops tagal in response to salinity and its implication for adaptiv evolution (in Chinese). Ph. D Thesis. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2007Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang G L. Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between two ecotypes of Hibiscus tiliaceus using cDNA microarray. PhD Thesis. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2007Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nguyen P D, Ho C L, Harikrishna J A, et al. Gerneration and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the mangrove plant, Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl. Tree Genetics Genome. 2006, 2: 196–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shan Liang
    • 1
    • 2
  • RenChao Zhou
    • 1
  • SuiSui Dong
    • 1
  • SuHua Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of EducationSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.College of Life ScienceSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations