Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene in aerosol and its environmental implication

  • Articles
  • Geochemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene in aromatic fraction of aerosols were identified by means of online hydrogenation gas chromatography mass spectrometry(GCMS). Compared aerosols from various sources, acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene were ubiquitously present in urban aerosol. High concentration of acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene were found in agricultural biomass and coal combustion particles. However, it is difficult to detect in exhaust from gasoline and diesel engine, dustfall, waste water, soil, and sediment. Combustion emissions were considered the major source of acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene, which can be used as a potential molecular marker for the source pollution in urban aerosols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oro J, Han J. High-Temperature Synthesis of Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Methane. Science, 1966, 153(3742): 1393–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee M L, and Hites R A. Characterization of sulfur-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in carbon blacks. Anal Chem, 1976, 78(13): 1890–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Severson R F, Snook M E, Arrendale R F, et al. Gas chromatographic quantitation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke. Anal Chem, 1976, 48(13): 1866–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee M L, Prado G P, Howard J B, et al. Source identification of urban airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by gas chromatographic mass spectrometry and high resolution mass spectrometry. Biomed Mass Spectrom, 1977, 4(3): 182–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Simoneit B R T, Rogge W F, Lang Q, et al. Molecular characterization of smoke from campfire burning of pine wood (Pinus elliottii). Chemosphere: Global Sci Change, 2000, 2(1): 107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hays M D, Fine P M, Geron C D, et al. Open burning of agricultural biomass: Physical and chemical properties of particle-phase emissions. Atmos Environ, 2005. 39(36): 6747–6764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Z, Li K, Lambert P, et al. Identification, characterization and quantitation of pyrogenic polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons and other organic compounds in tire fire products. J Chromatogr A, 2007, 1139(1): 14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishnan S, Hites R A. Identification of acephenanthrylene in combustion effluents. Anal Chem, 1981, 53(2): 342–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesnow S, Beck S, Ball L M, et al. Morphological transformation of C3H10T1/2CL8 cells by cyclopenta-fused derivatives of benzo[a] pyrene and benzo[e]pyrene. Cancer Lett, 1993, 74(1–2): 25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Busby Jr W F, Smith H, Plummer E F, et al. Mutagenicity of cyclopenta-fused polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and a non-polar fraction from a fuel combustion sample in a Salmonella forward mutation assay without exogenous metabolic activation. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En, 1997, 391(3): 117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Otero-Lobato M J, Kaats-Richters V E M, Koper C, et al. CP-arene oxides: the ultimate, active mutagenic forms of cyclopenta-fused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CP-PAHs). Mutat Res-Gen Tox En, 2005, 581(1–2): 115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard J B, Longwell J P, Marr J A, et al. Effects of PAH isomerizations on mutagenicity of combustion products. Combust Flame, 1995, 101(3): 262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawicki E. Analysis for airborne particulate hydrons. Their relative proportion affected by different types of pollution. Nat Cancer Inst Monograph, 1962, 9: 201–208

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg A, Bozzelli J W, Cannova F, et al. Correlation between lead and coroene at urban, suburban and industrial sites in New Jerrsey. Environ. Sci Technol, 1981, 17: 895–902

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng W, Sheng G Y, Fu J M, et al. Identification of 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene in aerosol of Pearl River Delta and its environmental implication. Chin Sci Bull (in Chinese), 1999, 42(7): 728–730

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simcik M F, Eisenreich S J, Lioy P J. Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan. Atmos Environ, 1999, 33(30): 5071–5079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou T. Characterization on sources composition of polyaromatic compounds on aerosol particle. Dissertation for the Master Degree (in Chinese), Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2006. 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wornat M J, Vernaglia B A, Lafleur A L, et al. Cyclopenta-fused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from brown coal pyrolysis. Proc Combust Inst, 1998, 27(2): 1677–1686

    Google Scholar 

  19. James C W. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in combustion residues from 1,3-butadiene. Chemosphere, 1998, 37(1): 143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh N D, and Wornat M J. Formation pathways of ethynyl-substituted and cyclopenta-fused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Proc Combust Inst, 2000, 28(2): 2585–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quan Shi.

Additional information

Supported by the National Major Basic Research Program of China (Grand No. 20030425007)

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, Q., Wang, T., Zhong, N. et al. Identification of acephenanthrylene and aceanthrylene in aerosol and its environmental implication. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 890–894 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0075-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0075-1

Keywords

Navigation