Skip to main content
Log in

Early-stage mineralization of hydrothermal tubeworms: New insights into the role of microorganisms in the process of mineralization

  • Articles
  • Geology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

As an important part of marine hydrothermal system, hydrothermal vent faunas live in hydrothermal inorganic environment and closely interact with hydrothermal inorganic environment. Sometimes, they can participate in the mineralization process of modern hydrothermal site. Hydrothermal vent faunas, particularly vestimentiferan and polychaete tubeworms, are occasionally preserved in the geological record. Study on the early mineralization process of hydrothermal vent fauna is significant for understanding the interaction between mineral and organism, and also the formation and preservation mechanism of geological fossil in hydrothermal environment. In this paper, the early stage of mineralization of Vestimentiferan Ridgeia piscesae tubes collected from Juan de Fuca Ridge is studied. The results showed that a lot of filamentous microorganisms were unevenly distributed on the surface of internal wall and in the interspace of the wall of tubeworm. In some cases, microorganisms aggregated as thin layers in or on the wall of tubeworm. The surfaces of microbial cells and the products of microbial degradation may play an important role in the early mineralization of tubeworm. Semitransparent thin layers of organic matter containing sulfur and sulfur granules were commonly found on the wall of tubeworm with lower degree of mineralization. The degradation production of these semitransparent thin layers may accelerate the mineralization of tube wall during the early stage. EDS results showed that on the tube walls some chemical elements such as Fe, P, Ca and Si are selectively enriched from ambient hydrothermal environment. Interestingly, P, Ca and Si covary with Fe content. Because element S originated from the bio-oxidation of H2S by symbiotic microorganism in the tissue of tubeworm, it can be considered as a biomarker when studying the mineralization process of tube wall. Based on the characteristics of tubeworms with different degrees of mineralization, we suggested that the early mineralization stage of tube wall was mainly controlled by microbial-induced mineralization and the degradation process of tube wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holden J F, Adams M W W. Microbe-metal interactions in marine hydrothermal environments. Current Opinion in Chem Biol, 2003, 7: 160–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reysenbach A L, Shock E S. Merging genomes with geochemistry in hydrothermal ecosystems. Science, 2002, 296: 1077–1082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards K J, Bach W, McCollom T M. Geomicrobiology in oceanography: microbe-mineral interactions at and below the seafloor. Trends Microbiol, 2005, 13(9): 449–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Juniper S K, Jonassan I V, Tunniclie V, et al. Influence of a tube-building polycheate on hydrothermal chimney mineralisation. Geology, 1992, 20: 895–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jannasch H W, Wirsen C O. Morphological survey of microbial mats near deep-sea thermal vents. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1981, 41: 528–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson D, Moyer C I. Neutrophilic Fe-oxidizing bacteria are abundant at the Loihi Seamount hydrothermal vents and play a major role in Fe oxide deposition. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2002, 68: 3085–3093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunnicliffe V, Fontaine A R. Faunal composition and organic surface encrustations at hydrothermal vents on the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge. J Geophys Res,1987, 92: 11303–11314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haymon R M, Koski R A, Sinclair C. Fossils of hydrothermal vent worms from Cretaceous sulphide ores of the Samail ophiolite, Oman. Science, 1984, 223: 1407–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Juniper S K, Sarrazin J. Interaction of vent biota and hydrothermal deposits: Present evidence and future experimentation. In: Humphris S E, Zierenberg R A, Mullineaux L S et al, eds. Sea£oor Hydrothermal Systems: Physical, Chemical, Biological, and Geological Interactions, Vol 91. Am Geophys Union Monogr, 1995. 178–193

  10. Cook T L, Stakes D S. Biogeological mineralization in deep-sea hydrothermal deposits. Science, 1995, 267: 1975–1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki Y, Kopp R E, Kogure T, et al. Sclerite formation in the hydrothermal-vent “scaly-foot” gastropod: possible control of iron sulfide biomineralization by the animal. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2006, 242: 39–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tufar W. Modern hydrothermal activity, formation of complex massive sulfide deposits and associated vent communities in the Manus back-arc basin (Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea). Mitt Osterr Geol Desaushaft, 1990, 82: 183–210

    Google Scholar 

  13. Little C T S, Herrington R J, Maslennikov V V, et al. Silurian hydrothermal vent community from the Southern Urals of Russia. Nature, 1997, 385: 146–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Little C T S, Cann J R, Herrington R J, et al. Late Cretaceous hydrothermal vent communities from the Troodos Ophiolite, Cyprus. Geology, 1999, 27: 1027–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Little C T S, Herrington R J, Haymon R M, et al. Early Jurassic hydrothermal vent community from the Franciscan Complex, San Rafael Mountains, California. Geology, 1999, 27: 167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maginn E J, Little C T S, Herrington R J, et al. Sulphide mineralisation in the deep sea hydrothermal vent polychaete, Alvinella pompejana: implications for fossil preservation. Mar Geol, 2002, 181: 337–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Juniper S K, Tebo B M. Microbe-metal interactions and mineral deposition at hydrothermal vents. In: Karl D M, ed. The Microbiology of Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995. 219–253

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urcuyo I A, Massothc G J, Julian D, et al. Habitat, growth and physiological ecology of a basaltic community of Ridgeia piscesae from the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Deep-Sea Research I, 2003, 50: 763–780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cary S C, Warren W, Anderson E, et al. Identification and localization of bacterial endosymbionts in hydrothermal vent taxa with symbiont-specific polymerase chain reaction amplification and in situ hybridization techniques. Mol Mar Biotechnol, 1993, 2:51–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaill F, Hunt S. The biology of annelid worms from high temperature hydrothermal vent regions. Rev Aquat Microbiol, 1991, 4: 107–137

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gaill F, Hunt S. Tubes of deep sea hydrothermal vent worms Riftia pachyptila (Vestimentifera) and Alvinella pompejana (Annelida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1986, 34: 267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowenstam H A. Minerals formed by organisms. Science, 1981, 211: 1126–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilby P R, Briggs D E G, Riou B. Mineralization of soft-bodied invertebrates in a Jurassic metaliferous deposit. Geology, 1996, 24: 847–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Dover C L. The Ecology of Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vents. Princeton-New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2000. 146–185

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cavanaugh C M, Gardiner C L, Jones M L, et al. Procaryotic cells in the hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila Jones: Possible chemoautotrophic symbionts. Science, 1981, 213: 340–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Felbeck H, Childress J J, Somero G N. Calvin-Benson cycle and sulphide oxidation enzymes in animals from sulphide-rich habitats. Nature, 1981, 293: 291–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelley D S, Baross J A, Delaney J R. Volcanoes, Fluids, and Life at Mid-Ocean Ridge Spreading Centers. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 2002, 30: 385–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beveridge T J, Fyfe W S. Metal oxidation by bacterial cell walls. Can J Earth Sci, 1985, 22: 1892–1898

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beveridge T J, Murray R G E. Sites of metal deposition in the cell wall of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol, 1980, 141: 876–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferris F G, Fyfe W S, Beveridge T J. Metallic ion binding by bacillus subtilis: implications for the fossilization of microorganisms. Geology, 1988, 16: 149–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng XiaoTong.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 40532011, 40403004 and 40473032)

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, X., Zhou, H., Tang, S. et al. Early-stage mineralization of hydrothermal tubeworms: New insights into the role of microorganisms in the process of mineralization. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 251–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0517-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0517-1

Keywords

Navigation