Skip to main content
Log in

Fast and accurate measurement of diffusion coefficient by Taylor’s dispersion analysis

  • Articles
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

This investigation aimed at improving the performance of Taylor’s dispersion analysis for the fast and accurate measurement of diffusion coefficient of a minute solute in various solvents. The investigation was carried out on a capillary electrophoresis instrument by monitoring the UV absorption peak of a solute pulse and calculating the diffusion coefficient by peak efficiency. With L-phenylalanine as a main testing solute, some key factors were afterward disclosed including especially the capillary size, carrier flow velocity, injection volume and capillary conditioning. Peak tailing, large volume of sample injection and slow migration were found to underestimate the diffusion coefficient while very fast migration and high sample concentration caused overestimation. At a moderate flow velocity of 0.1–1 cm/s with a capillary of 72.44 μm I.D. ×60 cm (50 cm effective) maintained at 25°C, the diffusion coefficient of aqueous L-phenylalanine was determined, giving a value of 7.02×10−6 cm2/s with error <2% and relative standard deviation <0.2% (n=3). The method was shown to be applicable to the measurement of various samples such as aqueous phenylalanine, acetone, phenol, toluene and benzene, and nonaqueous benzene (in ethanol or 1-butanol).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He L, Niemeyer B. A novel correlation for protein diffusion coefficients based on molecular weight and radius of gyration. Biotechnol Prog, 2003, 19(2): 544–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cussler E L. Diffusion Mass Transfer in Fluid System. 2nd ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia T J, Bloomfield V A. Hydrodynamic properties of complex, rigid, biological macromolecules: theory and application. Q Rev Biophys, 1981, 14: 81–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer P M, Hsu J T. Experimental studies of restricted protein diffusion in an agarose matrix. AIChE J, 1992, 38: 259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kong D D, Kosar T F, Dugan S R, et al. Diffusion of proteins and nonionic micelles in agarose gels by holographic interferometry. AIChE J, 1997, 43: 25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shingel K I, Faure M P. Structure-property relationships in poly (ethylene glycol)-protein hydrogel systems made from various proteins. Biomacromol, 2005, 6(3): 1635–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalieri F, Miano F, D’Antona P, et al. Study of gelling behavior of poly (vinyl alcohol)-methacrylate for potential utilizations in tissue replacement and drug delivery. Biomacromol, 2004, 5(6): 2439–2446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaigalas A K, Hubbard J B, McCurley M, et al. Diffusion of bovine serum albumin in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem, 1992, 96(5): 2355–2359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Girushka E, Edward J K J. Extension of the chromatographic broadening method of measuring diffusion coefficients to liquid systems. I. Diffusion coefficients of some alkylbenzenes in chloroform. J Phys Chem, 1974, 78(22): 2297–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gustafson K E, Dickhut R M. Molecular diffusivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution. J Chem Eng Data, 1994, 39(2): 281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grzesik M, Kulawska M T, Skrzypek J, et al. Enhancement of heterogeneous autocatalytic reactions accompanied by mass and heat transfer phenomena. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2004, 43(16): 4535–4539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stokes R H. An improved diaphragm-cell for diffusion studies and some tests of the method. J Am Chem Soc, 1950, 72(2): 763–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burns N L, Clunie J C, Baird J K. Diaphragm cell determination of the interdiffusion coefficients for aqueous solutions of copper sulfate, cobalt sulfate, and nickel sulfamate. J Phys Chem, 1991, 95(9): 3801–3804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Littel R J, Versteeg G F, Van S W P M. Diffusivity measurements in some organic solvents by a gas-liquid diaphragm cell. J Chem Eng Data, 1992, 37(1): 42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bettens B, Dekeyzer S, Van der B B, et al. Transport of pure components in pervaporation through a microporous silica membrane. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109: 5216–5222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cussler E L. Diffusion Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems. London: Cambridge University Press, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  17. Branca C, Magazu S, Maisano G, et al. Hydration study of PEG/water mixtures by quasi elastic light scattering, acoustic and rheological measurements. J Phys Chem B, 2002, 106(39): 10272–10276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang C, Li W, Wu C. Laser light-scattering study of solution dynamics of water/cycloether mixtures. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108(31): 11866–11870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pajevic S, Bansil R, Konak C. Dynamic light scattering study of linear polyelectrolyte diffusion in gels. Macromol, 1995, 28(22): 7536–7542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stejskal E O, Tanner J E. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys, 1965, 42(1): 288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Noda A, Hayamizu K, Watanabe M. Pulsed-gradient spin-echo 1H and 19F NMR ionic diffusion coefficient, viscosity, and ionic conductivity of non-chloroaluminate room-temperature ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B, 2001, 105(20): 4603–4610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komlosh M E, Callaghan P T. Spin diffusion in semidilute random coil polymers studied by pulsed gradient spin-echo NMR. Macromol, 2000, 33(18): 6824–6827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsukawa S, Ando I. Study of self-diffusion of molecules in a polymer gel by pulsed-gradient spin-echo 1H NMR. 2. Intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction between the probe polymer and network polymer in N, N-dimethylacrylamide-acrylic acid copolymer gel systems. Macromol, 1997, 30(26): 8310–8313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Porion P, Mukhtar M A, Faugere A M, et al. Water self-diffusion within nematic dispersions of nanocomposites: A multiscale analysis of 1H pulsed gradient spin-echo NMR measurements. J Phys Chem B, 2003, 107(17): 4012–4023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor G I. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc R Soc London Ser A, 1953, 219: 186–203

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor G I. Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion. Proc R Soc London Ser A, 1954, 225: 473–477

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aris R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc R Soc London Ser A, 1956, 235: 67–77

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yonezawa T, Tominaga T, Toshima N. Novel characterization of the structure of surfactants on nanoscopic metal clusters by a physicochemical method. Langmuir, 1995, 11(12): 4601–4604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wuelfing W P, Templeton A C, Hicks J F, et al. Taylor dispersion measurements of monolayer protected clusters: A physicochemical determination of nanoparticle size. Anal Chem, 1999, 71(18): 4069–4074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bello M S, Rezzonico R, Righetti P G. Use of Taylor-Aris dispersion for measurement of a solute diffusion coefficient in thin capillaries. Science, 1994, 266: 773–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma U, Gleason N J, Carbeck J D. Diffusivity of solutes measured in glass capillaries using Taylor’s analysis of dispersion and a commercial CE instrument. Anal Chem, 2005, 77(3): 806–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McGraw Hill. American Institute of Physics Handbook. New York: Academic Press, 1957

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mala G M, Li D. Flow characteristics of water in microtubes. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow, 1999, 20: 142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ekambara K, Joshi J B. Axial mixing in laminar pipe lows. Chem Engin Sci, 2004, 59: 3929–3944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ananthakrishnan V, Gill W N, Barduhn A J. Laminar dispersion in capillaries: I Mathematical analysis. Am Chem Engin J, 1965, 11: 1063–1072

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lide D R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (internet version). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gabler T, Paschke A, Schüürmann G. Diffusion coefficients of substituted benzenes at high dilution in water. J Chem Eng Data, 1996, 41(1): 33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Yi.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 20435030 and 20628507), Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2002CB713803)

About this article

Cite this article

Zou, M., Han, Y., Qi, L. et al. Fast and accurate measurement of diffusion coefficient by Taylor’s dispersion analysis. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 3325–3332 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0473-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0473-9

Keywords

Navigation