Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol, 2002, 3: RESEARCH0034
Thellin O, Zorzi W, Lakaye B, et al. Housekeeping genes as internal standards: Use and limits. J Biotechnol, 1999, 75: 291–295
Article
Google Scholar
Lee P D, Sladek R, Greenwood C M, et al. Control genes and variability: Absence of ubiquitous reference transcripts in diverse mammalian expression studies. Genome Res, 2002, 12: 292–297
Article
Google Scholar
Czechowski T, Stitt M, Altmann T, et al. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2005, 139: 5–17
Article
Google Scholar
Pfaffl M W, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, et al. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper—Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett, 2004, 26: 509–515
Article
Google Scholar
Goidin D, Mamessier A, Staquet M J, et al. Ribosomal 18S rRNA prevails over glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and beta-actin genes as internal standard for quantitative comparison of mRNA levels in invasive and noninvasive human melanoma cell subpopulations. Anal Biochem, 2001, 295: 17–21
Article
Google Scholar
Andersen C L, Jensen J L, Orntoft T F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: A model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res, 2004, 64: 5245–5250
Article
Google Scholar
Brunner A M, Yakovlev I A, Strauss S H. Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC Plant Biol, 2004, 4: 14
Article
Google Scholar
Dheda K, Huggett J F, Bustin S A, et al. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques, 2004, 37: 112–114
Google Scholar
Radonic A, Thulke S, Mackay I M, et al. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative realtime PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2004, 313: 856–862
Article
Google Scholar
Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi A K, et al. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006, 345: 646–651
Article
Google Scholar
Arpat A B, Waugh M, Sullivan J P, et al. Functional genomics of cell elongation in developing cotton fibers. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 54: 911–929
Article
Google Scholar
Li X B, Fan X P, Wang X L, et al. The cotton ACTIN1 gene is functionally expressed in fibers and participates in fiber elongation. Plant Cell, 2005, 17: 859–875
Article
Google Scholar
Lee J J, Hassan O S, Gao W, et al. Developmental and gene expression analyses of a cotton naked seed mutant. Planta, 2006, 223: 418–432
Article
Google Scholar
Shi Y H, Zhu S W, Mao X Z, et al. Transcriptome profiling, molecular biological, and physiological studies reveal a major role for ethylene in cotton fiber cell elongation. Plant Cell 2006, 18: 651–664
Article
Google Scholar
Samuel Yang S, Cheung F, Lee J J, et al. Accumulation of genome-specific transcripts, transcription factors and phytohormonal regulators during early stages of fiber cell development in allotetraploid cotton. Plant J, 2006, 47: 761–775
Article
Google Scholar
Zeng F, Zhang X, Zhu L, et al. Isolation and characterization of Genes associated to cotton somatic embryogenesis by suppression subtractive hybridization and macroarray. Plant Mol Biol, 2006, 60: 167–183
Article
Google Scholar
Wu J H, Zhang X L, Nie Y C, et al. Factors affecting somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from a range of recalcitrant genotypes of Chinese cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In Vitro Cell Del Biol Plant, 2004, 40: 371–375
Article
Google Scholar
Zhu L F, Tu L L, Zeng F C, et al. An improved simple protocol for isolation of high quality RNA from Gossypium spp. suitable for cDNA library construction. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31: 1657–1659
Google Scholar
Sun Y, Zhang X, Huang C, et al. Factors influencing in vitro regeneration from protoplasts of wild cotton (G. klotzschianum A) and RAPD analysis of regenerated plantlets. Plant Growth Regul, 2005, 46: 79–86
Article
Google Scholar
Liu D, Zhang X, Tu L, et al. Isolation by suppression-subtractive hybridization of genes preferentially expressed during early and late fiber development stages in cotton. Mol Biol (Mosk), 2006, 40: 825–834
Google Scholar
Kim B R, Nam H Y, Kim S U, et al. Normalization of reverse transcription quantitative-PCR with housekeeping genes in rice. Biotechnol Lett, 2003, 25: 1869–1872
Article
Google Scholar
Nicot N, Hausman J F, Hoffmann L, et al. Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J Exp Bot, 2005, 56: 2907–2914
Article
Google Scholar
Goncalves S, Cairney J, Maroco J, et al. Evaluation of control transcripts in real-time RT-PCR expression analysis during maritime pine embryogenesis. Planta, 2005, 222: 556–563
Article
Google Scholar
Reid K E, Olsson N, Schlosser J, et al. An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development. BMC Plant Biol, 2006, 14: 27
Article
Google Scholar
Laney J D, Hochstrasser M. Substrate targeting in the ubiquitin system. Cell, 1999, 97: 427–430
Article
Google Scholar
Callis J, Raasch J A, Vierstra R D. Ubiquitin extension proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Bio Chem, 1999, 265: 12486–12493
Google Scholar
Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: On protein death and cell life. EMBO J, 1998, 17: 7151–7160
Article
Google Scholar
Hochstrasser M. Evolution and function of ubiquitin-like protein-conjugation systems. Nat Cell Biol, 2000, 2: E153–E157
Article
Google Scholar
Basra A, Malik C P. Development of the cotton fiber. Int Rev Cytol, 1984, 89: 65–113
Article
Google Scholar
Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \(2^{ - \Delta \Delta C_T } \) method. Methods, 2001, 25: 402–408
Article
Google Scholar