Skip to main content
Log in

Transgene directionally integrated into C-genome of Brassica napus

  • Articles
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Integration of a transgene into a C-genome chromosome plays an important role in reducing ecological risk of transgenic Brassica napus. To obtain C-genome transgenic B. napus, herbicide-resistant bar gene was firstly transferred into B. oleracea var. alboglabra mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404. Then using the transgenic B. oleracea as paternal plants and 8 non-transgenic varieties of B. rapa as maternal plants, C-genome transgenic B. napus with bar gene was artificially resynthesized by means of ovary culture and chromosome doubling. Among 67 lines of the resynthesized B. napus, 31 were positive, and 36 were negative according to PCR test for bar gene. At least 2 plants from each line were kept for PPT spray confirmation. The result was in consistence with the PCR test. Genomic Southern blotting of three randomly chosen lines also showed that bar gene had been integrated into the genome of resynthesized B. napus lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkinson M J, Elliott L J, Allainguillaume J, et al. Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdon. Science, 2003, 302: 457–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mikkelsen T R, Jensen J, Jørgensen R B. Inheritance of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) RAPD markers in a backcross progeny with Brassica Campestris. Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 492–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Snow A A, Andersen B, Jørgensen R B. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy Brassica rapa. Mol Ecol, 1998, 8: 605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauser T P, Shaw R G, Østergård H. Fitness of F1 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity, 1998, 81: 429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Warkwick S I, Simard M J, Légère A, et al. Hybridization between transgenic Brassica napus L. and its wild relatives: B. rapa L., Raphanus raphanistrum L., Sinapis arvensis L., and Erucastrum gallicum (wild.) O. E. Schulz. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 528–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Metz P L J, Nap J P. A transgene-centered approach to the biosafety of transgenic plants: Overview of selection and reporter genes. Acta Bot Neerl, 1997, 46: 25–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hauser T P, Jørgensen RB, østergárd H. Fitness of backcross and F2 hybrids between weedy Brassica rapa and oilseed rape (B. napus). Heredity, 1998, 81: 436–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Metz P L J, Jacobsen E, Nap J P, et al. The impact on biosafety of the phosphinothricin-tolerance transgene in inter-specific B. rapa×B. napus hybrids and their successive backcrosses. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jørgensen R B, Andersen B, Hauser T P, et al. Introgression of crop genes from oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related wild species: An avenue for the escape of engineered genes. Acta Horticulturae, 1998, 459: 211–217

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scheffler J A, Dale P J. Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Res, 1994, 3: 263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eastham K, Sweet J. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. Environmental Issue Report No 28, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2002. 75

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mikkelsen T R, Andersen B, Jørgensen R B. The risks of crop transgene spread. Nature, 1996, 380: 31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu B, Lawrence J R, Warwick S I, et al. Inheritance of GFP-Bt transgenes from Brassica napus in backcrosses with three wild B.rapa accessions. Environ Biosafety Res, 2004, 3: 45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu C M, Kato M, Kakihara F. Destiny of a transgene escape from Brassica napus into Brassica rapa. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 105: 78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Snowdon R J, Friedrich T, Friedt W, et al. Identifying the chromosomes of the A-and C-genome diploid Brassica species B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea in their amphidiploid B. napus. Theor Appl Genet, 2002, 104: 533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Doyle J J, Doyle J I. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 1990, 12: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li Z, Liu H L, Luo P. Production and cytogeneric hybrids betwerassica napus and Orychophragmus violaceus. Theor Appl Genet, 1995, 91: 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharpe A G, Parkin I A, Keith D J, et al. Frequent nonreciprocal translocations in the amphidiploid genome of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Genome, 1995, 38: 1112–1121

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beversdorf W D, Weiss-Lerman J, Erickson Lr, et al. Transfer of cytoplasmically inherited triazine resistance from bird’s rape to cultivated oilseed rape (Brassica campestris and B. napus). Can J Genet Cytol, 1980, 22: 167–172

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jørgensen R B, Andersen B. Spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae): A risk of growing genetically modified oilseed rape. Am J Bot, 1994, 81: 1620–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Parkin I A P, Sharpe A G, Keith D J, et al. Identification of the A and C genomes of amphidiploid Brassica napus (oilseed rape). Genome, 1995, 38: 1122–1131

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parkin I A P, Lydiate D J. Conserved patterns of chromosome pairing and recombination in Brassica napus crosses. Genome, 1997, 40: 496–504

    Google Scholar 

  23. Namai H, Sarashima M, Hosoda T. Interspecific and inter-generic hybridization. In: Tsunoda S, Hinada K, Gomez-Campo C, eds. Brassica Crops and Wild Allies Biology and Breeding. Tokyo: Japanese Science Society Press, 1980. 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu C M, Xiao L, Wu Y H. Ecological risk assessment of transgenic rapeseed in China. J Agricul Biotechnol, 2005, 13(3): 267–275

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nozaki T, Mishiba K, Mii M, et al. Construction of synteny groups of Brassica alboglabra by RAPD markers and detection of chromosome aberrations and distorted transmission under the genetic background of B. campestris. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 538–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu C M. Fertilization fitness and relation to chromosome number in interspecific progeny between Brassica napus and B. rapa: A comparative study using natural and resynthesized B. napus. Breeding Science, 2001, 51: 73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snow A A, Andersen B, Jørgensen R B. Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa. Mol Ecol, 1999, 8: 605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tomiuk J, Hauser T P, Jørgensen R B. A-or C-chromosomes, does it matter for the transfer of transgenes from Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 100: 750–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. U N. Genomic analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan J Bot, 1935, 7: 389–452

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Xiaoping.

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Fang, X., Wang, Z. et al. Transgene directionally integrated into C-genome of Brassica napus . CHINESE SCI BULL 51, 1578–1585 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-006-2021-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-006-2021-4

Keywords

Navigation