Abstract
The bound states around a vortex in anisotropic superconductors is a longstanding yet important issue. In this work, we develop a variational theory on the basis of the Andreev approximation to obtain the energy levels and wave functions of the low-energy quantized bound states in superconductors with anisotropic pairing on arbitrary Fermi surface. In the case of circular Fermi surface, the effective Schrödinger equation yielding the bound state energies gets back to the theory proposed by Volovik and Kopnin many years ago. Our generalization here enables us to prove the equidistant energy spectrum inside a vortex in a broader class of superconductors. More importantly, we are now able to obtain the wave functions of these bound states by projecting the quasiclassical wave function on the eigenmodes of the effective Schrödinger equation, going beyond the quasiclassical Eilenberger results, which, as we find, are sensitive to the scattering rate. For the case of isotropic Fermi surface, the spatial profile of the low-energy local density of states is dominated near the vortex center and elongates along the gap antinode directions, in addition to the ubiquitous Friedel oscillation arising from the quantum inteference neglected in the Eilenberger theory. Moreover, as a consequence of the pairing anisotropy, the quantized wave functions develop a peculiar distribution of winding number, which reduces stepwise towards the vortex center. Our work provides a flexible way to study the vortex bound states in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Caroli, and P.-G. De Gennes, J. Matricon Phys. Lett. 9, 307 (1964).
P.-G. de Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (Westview Press, Boulder, 1999).
G. E. Volovik, Jetp Lett. 70, 609 (1999).
N. Read, and D. Green, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).
D. A. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).
A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003).
C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15001 (2015).
N. Hayashi, M. Ichioka, and K. Machida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4074 (1996).
N. Schopohl, and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. B 52, 490 (1995).
M. Ichioka, N. Hayashi, N. Enomoto, and K. Machida, Phys. Rev. B 53, 15316 (1996).
M. Franz, and Z. Tešanović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4763 (1998).
G. E. Volovik, JETP Lett. 58, 25 (1993).
L. Fu, and E. Berg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 097001 (2010).
L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B 90, 100509 (2014).
W. C. Bao, Q. K. Tang, D. C. Lu, and Q. H. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 98, 054502 (2018).
L. Yang, and Q. H. Wang, New J. Phys. 21, 093036 (2019).
Y. Nagai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 063705 (2014).
D. L. Fang, J. S. Liu, and Y. K. Cui, Phys. C-Supercond. Appl. 591, 1353963 (2021).
H. F. Hess, R. B. Robinson, and J. V. Waszczak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2711 (1990).
C. L. Song, Y. L. Wang, P. Cheng, Y. P. Jiang, W. Li, T. Zhang, Z. Li, K. He, L. Wang, J. F. Jia, H. H. Hung, C. Wu, X. Ma, X. Chen, and Q. K. Xue, Science 332, 1410 (2011).
T. Hanaguri, K. Kitagawa, K. Matsubayashi, Y. Mazaki, Y. Uwatoko, and H. Takagi, Phys. Rev. B 85, 214505 (2012).
S. Kaneko, K. Matsuba, M. Hafiz, K. Yamasaki, E. Kakizaki, N. Nishida, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Kawakami, T. Mizushima, and K. Machida, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 063701 (2012).
Z. Du, D. Fang, Z. Wang, Y. Li, G. Du, H. Yang, X. Zhu, and H. H. Wen, Sci. Rep. 5, 9408 (2015).
W. L. Wang, Y. M. Zhang, Y. F. Lv, H. Ding, L. Wang, W. Li, K. He, C. L. Song, X. C. Ma, and Q. K. Xue, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134524 (2018).
R. Tao, Y. J. Yan, X. Liu, Z. W. Wang, Y. Ando, Q. H. Wang, T. Zhang, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041024 (2018).
M. Chen, X. Chen, H. Yang, Z. Du, X. Zhu, E. Wang, and H. H. Wen, Nat. Commun. 9, 970 (2018).
M. Chen, X. Chen, H. Yang, Z. Du, and H. H. Wen, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1084 (2018).
Y. Yuan, J. Pan, X. Wang, Y. Fang, C. Song, L. Wang, K. He, X. Ma, H. Zhang, F. Huang, W. Li, and Q. K. Xue, Nat. Phys. 15, 1046 (2019).
T. Zhang, W. Bao, C. Chen, D. Li, Z. Lu, Y. Hu, W. Yang, D. Zhao, Y. Yan, X. Dong, Q. H. Wang, T. Zhang, and D. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127001 (2021).
X. Chen, W. Duan, X. Fan, W. Hong, K. Chen, H. Yang, S. Li, H. Luo, and H. H. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 257002 (2021).
F. Gygi, and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. B 43, 7609 (1991).
G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rep. 351, 195 (2001).
N. B. Kopnin, Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001)
A. F. Andreev, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 1823 (1964).
G. Eilenberger, Z. Physik 214, 195 (1968).
N. Schopohl, arXiv: 9804064.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Da Wang thanks N. Schopohl for bringing us ref. [38] about technical details in solving the Eilenberger equation. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1403201), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12274205, 12374147, 92365203, and 11874205).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiang, K., Wang, D. & Wang, QH. Quantized bound states around a vortex in anisotropic superconductors. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 267412 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2353-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2353-6