References
A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, and D. Scolnic, Astrophys. J. 876, 85 (2019), arXiv: 1903.07603.
N. Aghanim, et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A11 (2016), arXiv: 1507.02704.
N. Aghanim, et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv: 1907.12875.
P. A. R. Ade, et al. (BICEP2 and Keck Array Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 221301 (2018), arXiv: 1810.05216.
N. Aghanim, et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv: 1807.06209.
T. Tram, R. Vallance, and V. Vennin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2017(01), 046 (2017), arXiv: 1606.09199.
R. Y. Guo, and X. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 882 (2017), arXiv: 1704.04784.
R. Y. Guo, L. Zhang, J. F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 030411 (2019), arXiv: 1801.02187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975072, 11875102, 11835009, and 11690021), the Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (Grant No. XLYC1905011), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. N2005030).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, RY., Zhang, JF. & Zhang, X. Inflation model selection revisited after a 1.91% measurement of the Hubble constant. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 290406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-1514-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-1514-0