Skip to main content
Log in

Time optimal quantum control of two-qubit systems

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the optimal quantum control of heteronuclear two-qubit systems described by a Hamiltonian containing both nonlocal internal drift and local control terms. We derive an explicit formula to compute the minimum time required to steer the system from an initial state to a specified final state. As applications the minimal time to implement Controlled-NOT gate, SWAP gate and Controlled-U gate is calculated in detail. The experimental realizations of these quantum gates are explicitly presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warren W, Rabitz H, Dahleb M. Coherent control of quantum dynamics: The dream is alive. Science, 1993, 259: 1581–1589

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Rabitz H, de Vivie-Riedle R, Motzkus M, et al. Whither the future of controlling quantum phenomena? Science, 2000, 288: 824–828

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel C, Full J, Gonzàlez L, et al. Deciphering the reaction dynamics underlying optimal control laser fields. Science, 2003, 299: 536–539

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ernst R R, Bodenhausen G, Wokaun A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gershenfeld N A, Chuang I L. Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science, 1997, 275: 350–356; Cory D G, Fahmy A, Havel T. Ensemble quantum computing by NMR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 1634–1639

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lapert M, Salomon J, Sugny D. Time-optimal monotonically convergent algorithm with an application to the control of spin systems. Phys Rev A, 2012, 85: 033406

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tibbetts K W M, Brif C, Grace M D, et al. Exploring the tradeoff between fidelity and time optimal control of quantum unitary transformations. Phys Rev A, 2012, 86: 062309

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Motzoi F, Gambetta J M, Merkel S T, et al. Optimal control methods for rapidly time-varying Hamiltonians. Phys Rev A, 2011, 84: 022307

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Assémat E, Lapert M, Zhang Y, et al. Simultaneous time-optimal control of the inversion of two spin-1/2 particles. Phys Rev A, 2010, 82: 013415

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lapert M, Zhang Y, Braun M, et al. Singular extremals for the timeoptimal control of dissipative spin 1/2 particles. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 104: 083001

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khaneja N, Brockett R, Glaser S J. Time optimal control in spin systems. Phys Rev A, 2001, 63: 032308

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Makhlin Y. Nonlocal properties of two-qubit gates and mixed states, and the optimization of quantum computations. Quant Inf Proc, 2002, 1: 243–252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang J, Vala J, Sastry S, et al. Geometric theory of nonlocal two-qubit operations. Phys Rev A, 2003, 67: 042313

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glaser J, Schulte-Herbrüggen T, Sieveking M, et al. Unitary control in quantum ensembles: Maximizing signal intensity in coherent spectroscopy. Science, 1998, 280: 421–424

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShaoMing Fei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, B., Yu, Z., Fei, S. et al. Time optimal quantum control of two-qubit systems. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 56, 2116–2121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5325-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5325-9

Keywords

Navigation