Skip to main content
Log in

Flow characteristics of hypersonic inlets with different cowl-lip blunting methods

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under hypersonic flight conditions, the sharp cowl-lip leading edges have to be blunted because of the severe aerodynamic heating. This paper proposes four cowl-lip blunting methods and studies the corresponding flow characteristics and performances of the generic hypersonic inlets by numerical simulation under the design conditions of a flight Mach number of 6 and an altitude of 26 km. The results show that the local shock interference patterns in the vicinity of the blunted cowl-lips have a substantial influence on the flow characteristics of the hypersonic inlets even though the blunting radius is very small, which contribute to a pronounced degradation of the inlet performance. The Equal Length blunting Manner (ELM) is the most optimal in that a nearly even reflection of the ramp shock produces an approximately straight and weak cowl reflection shock. The minimal total pressure loss, the lowest cowl drag, maximum mass-capture and the minimal aeroheating are achieved for the hypersonic inlet. For the other blunting manners, the ramp shock cannot reflect evenly and produces more curved cowl reflection shock. The Type V shock interference pattern occurs for the Cross Section Cutting blunting Manner (CSCM) and the strongest cowl reflection shock gives rise to the largest flow loss and drag. The cowl-lip blunted by the other two blunting manners is subjected to the shock interference pattern that transits with an increase in the blunting radius. Accordingly, the peak heat flux does not fall monotonously with the blunting radius increasing. Moreover, the cowl-lip surface suffers from severe aerothermal load when the shear layer or the supersonic jet impinges on the wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curran E T, Murthy S N B. Scramjet Propulsion. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2000. 447–511

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertin J J. Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics. Washington, DC: AIAA, 1994. 240–267

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson J D. Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2000. 346–355

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanator R J, Boccio J L, Shamshins D. Effect of Bluntness on Hypersonic Two-dimensional Inlet Type Flows. Technical Report, NASA CR-1145, Washington, DC. 1968

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ault D, Van Wie D. Experimental and computational results for the external flowfield of a scramjet inlet. J Propul Power, 1994, 10(4): 533–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Edney B. Anomalous Heat Transfer and Pressure Distributions on Blunt Bodies at Hypersonic Speeds in the Presence of an Impinging Shock. Technical Report, FFA 115, Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden. 1968

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan B. Summary of the Aerothermodynamic Interference Literature. Technical Report, TN 4051-160, Naval Weapons Center (China Lake, Calif.). 1969

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korkegi R H. Survey of viscous interactions associated with high Mach number flight. AIAA J, 1971, 9(5): 771–784

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts J D. Flight Experience with Shock Impingement and Interference Heating on the X-15-2 Research Airplane. Technical Report, NASA TM X-1669, Washington, DC. 1968

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keyes J W, Hains F D. Analytical and Experimental Studies of Shock Interference Heating in Hypersonic Flows. Technical Report, NASA TN D-7139, Washington, DC. 1973

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morris D J, Keyes J W. Computer Programs for Predicting Supersonic and Hypersonic Interference Flow Fields and Heating. Technical Report, NASA TM X-2725, Washington, DC. 1973

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wieting A R, Holden M S. Experimental study of shock wave interference heating on a cylindrical leading edge at Mach 6 and 8. AIAA J, 1989, 27(11): 1557–1565

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yee H C, Klopfer G H, Montagne J L. High-resolution shock capturing schemes for inviscid and viscous hypersonic flows. J Comput Phys, 1990, 88(1): 31–61

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Borovoy V, Chinilov A, Gusev V, et al. Interference between a cylindrical bow shock and a plane oblique shock. AIAA J, 1997, 35(11): 1721–1728

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frame M, Lewis M. Analytical solution of the type IV shock interaction. J Propul Power, 1997, 13(5): 601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lind C, Lewis M. Computational analysis of the unsteady type IV shock interaction of blunt body flows. J Propul Power, 1996, 12(1): 127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lind C. Effect of geometry on the unsteady type-IV shock interaction. J Aircraft, 1997, 34(1): 64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wieting A R. Multiple shock-shock interference on a cylindrical leading edge. AIAA J, 1992, 30(8): 2073–2079

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu K, Parpia I H. Simulation of multiple shock-shock interference patterns on a cylindrical leading edge. AIAA J, 1996, 34(4): 764–771

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang W, Xie L, Guo R. Influence of blunting manner of the lip highlight of hypersonic inlet on the aerothermodynamic performance. AIAA paper 2011-2306. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu H B, Yue L J, Xiao Y B, et al. Interaction of isentropic compression waves with a bow shock. AIAA J, 2013, 15(10): 2474–2484

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Prabhu R, Thareja R, Wieting A R. Computational studies of a fluid spike as a leading edge protection device for shock-shock interference heating. AIAA paper 91-1734. 1991

    Google Scholar 

  23. Albertson C W, Venkat V S. Shock Interaction control for scramjet cowl leading edges. AIAA paper 2005-3289. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kandala R, Candler G V. Numerical studies of laser-induced energy deposition for supersonic flow control. AIAA J, 2004, 42(11): 2266–2275

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Adeleren R G, Hong Y, Elliott G S, et al. Control of Edney IV interaction by pulsed laser energy deposition. AIAA J, 2005, 43(2): 256–269

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tincher D, Lane J. On the design of a hypersonic waverider test bed vehicle: A first step to outer planet exploration. AIAA paper 92-0308. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  27. Billig F S. Shock-wave shapes around spherical and cylindrical-nosed bodies. J Spacecraft Rockets, 1967, 4(6): 822–823

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Takashima N, Lewis M J. Navier-Stokes computations of a viscous optimized waverider. AIAA paper 92-0305. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Wie D, Drewry D, King D, et al. The hypersonic environment: Required operating conditions and design challenges. J Mater Sci, 2004, 39(19): 5915–5924

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sha P, Zhengyu T, Dinghua F, et al. Computation and analysis of aeroheating on hypersonic inlet leading edge. AIAA paper 2009-7370. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shen C. Rarefied Gas Dynamics. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. 13–14

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Wie D, Ault D. Internal flowfield characteristics of a scramjet inlet at Mach 10. J Propul Power, 1996, 12(1): 158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tang M, Chase R L. The quest for hypersonic flight with air-breathing Propulsion. AIAA paper 2008-2546. 2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LianJie Yue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, H., Yue, L. & Chang, X. Flow characteristics of hypersonic inlets with different cowl-lip blunting methods. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 741–752 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5285-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5285-0

Keywords

Navigation