Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing Raman quantum memory with dynamic phase

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical quantum memory is a key component of emerging quantum technologies and applications. One of the most promising protocols, far-off-resonant Raman memory, is still beset by its efficiency. Until now, the only effective method for enhancing its efficiency in experiments has been the intensity modulation method on the control field, while the experimental demonstrations still fail to meet the theoretical expectation. In this study, we experimentally demonstrate how to optimize the Raman quantum memory process using a new method called phase modulation; 52.7% total memory efficiency is realized by applying a phase modulation on the control field with a near-square intensity waveform of the control field, thereby resulting in an increase in efficiency of 13.3% compared to the best case of no phase modulation. Additionally, a hybrid method, combining the phase and intensity modulations, is demonstrated with 87.3% memory efficiency. Such high-efficiency results in 99.0% unconditional fidelity even at near single photon level. The unconditional fidelity is always higher than that of the intensity method as the input photon number of the signal increases and can still beat the nonclone limit, even at 128.1 photons/pulse. Our phase modulation method has great potential applications in quantum information processing due to the advantages of low experimental requirements but an additional degree of freedom and high performance, especially for the high speed and high photon number state manipulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson K R, Beavan S E, Longdell J J, et al. Generation of light with multimode time-delayed entanglement using storage in a solid-state spin-wave quantum memory. Phys Rev Lett, 2016, 117: 020501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhaskar M K, Riedinger R, Machielse B, et al. Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication. Nature, 2020, 580: 60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heshami K, England D G, Humphreys P C, et al. Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances. J Modern Opt, 2016, 63: 2005–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reim K F, Michelberger P, Lee K C, et al. Single-photon-level quantum memory at room temperature. Phys Rev Lett, 2011, 107: 053603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo J, Feng X, Yang P, et al. High-performance Raman quantum memory with optimal control in room temperature atoms. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseini M, Campbell G, Sparkes B M, et al. Unconditional room-temperature quantum memory. Nat Phys, 2011, 7: 794–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sparkes B M, Hosseini M, Cairns C, et al. Precision spectral manipulation: a demonstration using a coherent optical memory. Phys Rev X, 2012, 2: 021011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, et al. Storage of light in atomic vapor. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 86: 783–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Longdell J J, Fraval E, Sellars M J, et al. Stopped light with storage times greater than one second using electromagnetically induced transparency in a solid. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 95: 063601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Honda K, Akamatsu D, Arikawa M, et al. Storage and retrieval of a squeezed vacuum. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 100: 093601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Riedmatten H, Afzelius M, Staudt M U, et al. A solid-state light-matter interface at the single-photon level. Nature, 2008, 456: 773–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Afzelius M, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, et al. Multimode quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs. Phys Rev A, 2009, 79: 052329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michelberger P S, Champion T F M, Sprague M R, et al. Interfacing GHz-bandwidth heralded single photons with a warm vapour Raman memory. New J Phys, 2015, 17: 043006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsiao Y F, Tsai P J, Chen H S, et al. Highly efficient coherent optical memory based on electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 120: 183602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma Y, Ma Y Z, Zhou Z Q, et al. One-hour coherent optical storage in an atomic frequency comb memory. Nat Commun, 2021, 12: 2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding D S, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, et al. Raman quantum memory of photonic polarized entanglement. Nat Photon, 2015, 9: 332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunn J, Reim K, Lee K C, et al. Multimode memories in atomic ensembles. Phys Rev Lett, 2008, 101: 260502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. England D G, Fisher K A G, MacLean J P W, et al. Storage and retrieval of THz-bandwidth single photons using a room- temperature diamond quantum memory. Phys Rev Lett, 2015, 114: 053602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorshkov A V, Andre A, Lukin M D, et al. Photon storage in λ-type optically dense atomic media. II. Free-space model. Phys Rev A, 2007, 76: 033805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Kalachev A, Kocharovskaya O. All-optical quantum storage based on spatial chirp of the control field. Phys Rev A, 2014, 90: 052322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Minar J, Sangouard N, Afzelius M, et al. Spin-wave storage using chirped control fields in atomic frequency comb-based quantum memory. Phys Rev A, 2010, 82: 042309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Kalachev A, Kocharovskaya O. Quantum storage based on control-field angular scanning. Phys Rev A, 2013, 87: 013811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalachev A, Kocharovskaya O. Multimode cavity-assisted quantum storage via continuous phase-matching control. Phys Rev A, 2013, 88: 033846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dabrowski M, Chrapkiewicz R, Wasilewski W. Hamiltonian design in readout from room-temperature Raman atomic memory. Opt Express, 2014, 22: 26076–26091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalachev A, Kocharovskaya O. Quantum storage via refractive-index control. Phys Rev A, 2011, 83: 053849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark J, Heshami K, Simon C. Photonic quantum memory in two-level ensembles based on modulating the refractive index in time: equivalence to gradient echo memory. Phys Rev A, 2012, 86: 013833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gorshkov A V, Andre A, Lukin M D, et al. Photon storage in λ-type optically dense atomic media. I. Cavity model. Phys Rev A, 2007, 76: 033804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shinbrough K, Hunt B D, Lorenz V O. Optimization of broadband λ-type quantum memory using Gaussian pulses. Phys Rev A, 2021, 103: 062418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Appel J, MacRae A, Lvovsky A I. A versatile digital GHz phase lock for external cavity diode lasers. Meas Sci Technol, 2009, 20: 055302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zahedinejad E, Schirmer S, Sanders B C. Evolutionary algorithms for hard quantum control. Phys Rev A, 2014, 90: 032310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang X, Li J, Peng X. An improved differential evolution algorithm for learning high-fidelity quantum controls. Sci Bull, 2019, 64: 1402–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang K, Guo J, Chen L Q, et al. Suppression of the four-wave-mixing background noise in a quantum memory retrieval process by channel blocking. Phys Rev A, 2014, 90: 033823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nunn J, Munns J H D, Thomas S, et al. Theory of noise suppression in λ-type quantum memories by means of a cavity. Phys Rev A, 2017, 96: 012338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bustard P J, England D G, Heshami K, et al. Reducing noise in a Raman quantum memory. Opt Lett, 2016, 41: 5055–5058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas S E, Hird T M, Munns J H D, et al. Raman quantum memory with built-in suppression of four-wave-mixing noise. Phys Rev A, 2019, 100: 033801

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021ZD-0303200), Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. 202101070008E00099), National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0302001), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11904227, 12104161, 11654005, 11874152, 12274132, 12204303), Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 2020TQ0193,2021M702146), and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2019SHZDZX01). Weiping ZHANG also acknowledges additional support from the Shanghai Talent Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinxian Guo or Weiping Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ming, S., Guo, J., Wu, Y. et al. Optimizing Raman quantum memory with dynamic phase. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66, 180505 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3614-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-022-3614-7

Keywords

Navigation