Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A review of system modeling, assessment and operational optimization for integrated energy systems

  • Review
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building an efficient, safe, and sustainable energy system has been listed as one of the national energy development strategies in China. Through unified management and optimization for the processes of energy generation, transmission, conversion, and distribution, the integrated energy system (IES) can meet the diversified demands on energy with high efficiency and effectiveness, providing the basis to form a low-carbon sustainable social development mode. This research reviews the studies and issues of system modeling, assessment, and operational optimization on the IES. The ongoing problems that need further investigation are also presented. Besides, research of data-driven approaches on the IES will be discussed, based on which the future research directions are suggested here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang Y, Campana P E, Lundblad A, et al. Planning and operation of an integrated energy system in a Swedish building. Energy Convers Manage, 2019, 199: 111920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y L, Wang X H, Yu H Y, et al. Optimal design of integrated energy system considering economics, autonomy and carbon emissions. J Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shabanpour-Haghighi A, Seifi A R. Simultaneous integrated optimal energy flow of electricity, gas, and heat. Energy Convers Manage, 2015, 101: 579–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y L, Wang Y D, Huang Y J, et al. Optimal scheduling of the regional integrated energy system considering economy and environment. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2019, 10: 1939–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinen S, Burke D, O’Malley M. Electricity, gas, heat integration via residential hybrid heating technologies—an investment model assessment. Energy, 2016, 109: 906–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gong F X, Li D Z, Tian S M, et al. Review and prospect of core technologies of integrated energy system (in Chinese). Renew Energy Resour, 2019, 37: 1229–1235

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jia H J, Wang D, Xu X D, et al. Research on some key problems related to integrated energy systems (in Chinese). Autom Electr Power Syst, 2015, 39: 198–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins S, Deane J P, Poncelet K, et al. Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: a methodological review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 76: 839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clegg S, Mancarella P. Integrated electricity-heat-gas modelling and assessment, with applications to the Great Britain system. Part I: high-resolution spatial and temporal heat demand modelling. Energy, 2019, 184: 180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang T, Zhao L Y, Wang C S. Review on application of artificial intelligence in power system and integrated energy system (in Chinese). Autom Electr Power Syst, 2019, 43: 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L X, Zheng J H, Li M S, et al. Multi-time scale dynamic analysis of integrated energy systems: an individual-based model. Appl Energy, 2019, 237: 848–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu X Q, Guo Q L, Sun H B, et al. Typical scenario set generation algorithm for an integrated energy system based on the Wasserstein distance metric. Energy, 2017, 135: 153–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J W, Zhang N, Wang Y, et al. Review and prospect of multiple energy systems towards renewable energy accommodation (in Chinese). Autom Electr Power Syst, 2018, 42: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Correa-Posada C M, Sanchez-Martin P. Security-constrained optimal power and natural-gas flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2014, 29: 1780–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saldarriaga-Cortés C, Salazar H, Moreno R, et al. Stochastic planning of electricity and gas networks: an asynchronous column generation approach. Appl Energy, 2019, 233–234: 1065–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo S L, Yang L, Zhang X, et al. A fully linear-constrained optimal electricity-gas flow in an integrated energy system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2). Beijing: IEEE, 2018. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fang X, Craig M T, Hodge B M. Linear approximation line pack model for integrated electricity and natural gas systems OPF project description. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Atlanta, 2019. 1–5

  18. Gu W, Lu S, Wang J, et al. Modeling of the heating network for multi-district integrated energy system and its operation optimization (in Chinese). Power Syst Technol, 2017, 37: 1305–1315

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nikula R P, Ruusunen M, Leiviskä K. Data-driven framework for boiler performance monitoring. Appl Energy, 2016, 183: 1374–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y X, Zhang N, Wang Y, et al. Data-driven power flow linearization: a regression approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 2569–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei Z N, Zhong L L, Xue M F, et al. Linearization flow calculation for integrated electricity-heat energy system based on data-driven (in Chinese). Electr Power Autom Equip, 2019, 39: 31–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pourjafari E, Reformat M. A support vector regression based model predictive control for volt-var optimization of distribution systems. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 93352–93363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang Y P, Li X E, Yang Z P, et al. The application of cyber physical system for thermal power plants: data-driven modeling. Energies, 2018, 11: 690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X E, Wang N L, Wang L G, et al. A data-driven model for the air-cooling condenser of thermal power plants based on data reconciliation and support vector regression. Appl Thermal Eng, 2018, 129: 1496–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Yang Z F, Yu J, et al. Fast calculation of probabilistic power flow: a model-based deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2020, 11: 2235–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Touš M, Pavlas M, Putna O, et al. Combined heat and power production planning in a waste-to-energy plant on a short-term basis. Energy, 2015, 90: 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rossi F, Velázquez D. A methodology for energy savings verification in industry with application for a CHP (combined heat and power) plant. Energy, 2015, 89: 528–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J X, Zhong H W, Lai X W, et al. Exploring key weather factors from analytical modeling toward improved solar power forecasting. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 1417–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H W, Li Q, Sun Z N, et al. Combining data-driven and model-driven methods for robust facial landmark detection. IEEE Trans Inform Forensic Secur, 2018, 13: 2409–2422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao L X, Shao L L, Zhang C L. Steady-state hybrid modeling of economized screw water chillers using polynomial neural network compressor model. Int J Refrigeration, 2010, 33: 729–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Geidl M, Koeppel G, Favre-Perrod P, et al. Energy hubs for the future. IEEE Power Energy Mag, 2007, 5: 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu X D, Jin X L, Jia H J, et al. Hierarchical management for integrated community energy systems. Appl Energy, 2015, 160: 231–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ayele G T, Haurant P, Laumert B, et al. An extended energy hub approach for load flow analysis of highly coupled district energy networks: illustration with electricity and heating. Appl Energy, 2018, 212: 850–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shabanpour-Haghighi A, Seifi A R. Energy flow optimization in multicarrier systems. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2015, 11: 1067–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Evins R, Orehounig K, Dorer V, et al. New formulations of the ‘nergy hub’ model to address operational constraints. Energy, 2014, 73: 387–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Almassalkhi M R, Towle A. Enabling city-scale multi-energy optimal dispatch with energy hubs. In: Proceedings of the Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), Genoa, 2016. 1–7

  37. Xu X D, Jia H J, Chiang H D, et al. Dynamic modeling and interaction of hybrid natural gas and electricity supply system in microgrid. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2015, 30: 1212–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu X D, Jia H J, Wang D, et al. Hierarchical energy management system for multi-source multi-product microgrids. Renew Energy, 2015, 78: 621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shen F, Ju P, Shahidehpour M, et al. Singular perturbation for the dynamic modeling of integrated energy systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2020, 35: 1718–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Clegg S, Mancarella P. Integrated modeling and assessment of the operational impact of power-to-gas (P2G) on electrical and gas transmission networks. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2015, 6: 1234–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Correa-posada C M, Sánchez-martín P, Lumbreras S. Security-constrained model for integrated power and natural-gas system. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy, 2017, 5: 326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qi F, Shahidehpour M, Wen F, et al. Decentralized privacy-preserving operation of multi-area integrated electricity and natural gas systems with renewable energy resources. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2020, 11: 1785–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou B, Fang J K, Ai X M, et al. Linear network model for integrated power and gas distribution systems with bidirectional energy conversion. IET Renew Power Gener, 2020, 14: 3284–3291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Qi F, Shahidehpour M, Li Z Y, et al. A chance-constrained decentralized operation of multi-area integrated electricity-natural gas systems with variable wind and solar energy. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2020, 11: 2230–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pan Z G, Guo Q L, Sun H B. Interactions of district electricity and heating systems considering time-scale characteristics based on quasi-steady multi-energy flow. Appl Energy, 2016, 167: 230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhong J J, Li Y, Zeng Z L, et al. Quasi-steady-state analysis and calculation of multi-energy flow for integrated energy system (in Chinese). Electr Power Autom Equip, 2019, 39: 22–30

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li Z G, Wu W C, Wang J H, et al. Transmission-constrained unit commitment considering combined electricity and district heating networks. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2016, 7: 480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu S, Gu W, Zhou S Y, et al. High-resolution modeling and decentralized dispatch of heat and electricity integrated energy system. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2020, 11: 1451–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Acha E, Fuerte-Esquivel C R, Ambriz-Perez H, et al. FACTS: Modelling and Simulation in Power Networks. New York: Wiley, 2004

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Carroll J. Natural Gas Hydrates: A Guide for Engineers. Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhao H P. Analysis, modelling and operational optimization of district heating systems. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  52. Meng Q W, Guan Q S, Jia N, et al. An improved sequential energy flow analysis method based on multiple balance nodes in gas-electricity interconnection systems. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 95487–95495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang W L, Wang D, Jia H J, et al. Steady state analysis of electricity-gas regional integrated energy system with consideration of NGS network status (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2017, 37: 1293–1305

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liu X Z, Wu J Z, Jenkins N, et al. Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks. Appl Energy, 2016, 162: 1238–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gu Z P, Kang C Q, Chen X Y, et al. Operation optimization of integrated power and heat energy systems and the benefit on wind power accommodation considering heating network constraints (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2015, 35: 3596–3604

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shabanpour-Haghighi A, Seifi A R. An integrated steady-state operation assessment of electrical, natural gas, and district heating networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2016, 31: 3636–3647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang Y R, Zeng B, Guo J, et al. Multi-energy flow calculation method for integrated energy system (in Chinese). Power Syst Technol, 2016, 40: 2942–2950

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bao Y Q, Wu M, Zhou X T, et al. Piecewise linear approximation of gas flow function for the optimization of integrated electricity and natural gas system. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 91819–91826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Trodden P A, Bukhsh W A, Grothey A, et al. Optimization-based islanding of power networks using piecewise linear AC power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2014, 29: 1212–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Martinez-Mares A, Fuerte-Esquivel C R. A unified gas and power flow analysis in natural gas and electricity coupled networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2012, 27: 2156–2166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zeng Q, Fang J K, Li J H, et al. Steady-state analysis of the integrated natural gas and electric power system with bi-directional energy conversion. Appl Energy, 2016, 184: 1483–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dai W, Yu J, Yang Z F, et al. A static equivalent model of natural gas network for electricity-gas co-optimization. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2020, 11: 1473–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang X, Strbac G, Teng F, et al. Economic assessment of alternative heat decarbonisation strategies through coordinated operation with electricity system — UK case study. Appl Energy, 2018, 222: 79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu B, Meng K, Dong Z Y, et al. Optimal dispatch of coupled electricity and heat system with independent thermal energy storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2019, 34: 3250–3263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Liu X Z, Yan Z, Wu J Z. Optimal coordinated operation of a multi-energy community considering interactions between energy storage and conversion devices. Appl Energy, 2019, 248: 256–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu X Z, Mancarella P. Modelling, assessment and Sankey diagrams of integrated electricity-heat-gas networks in multi-vector district energy systems. Appl Energy, 2016, 167: 336–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang Q, Li F, Tang Y, et al. Integrating model-driven and data-driven methods for power system frequency stability assessment and control. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2019, 34: 4557–4568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Guelpa E, Verda V. Compact physical model for simulation of thermal networks. Energy, 2019, 175: 998–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Yao S, Gu W, Lu S, et al. Dynamic optimal energy flow in the heat and electricity integrated energy system. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2021, 12: 179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Correa-Posada C M, Sanchez-Martin P. Integrated power and natural gas model for energy adequacy in short-term operation. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2015, 30: 3347–3355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Yang J W, Zhang N, Kang C Q, et al. Effect of natural gas flow dynamics in robust generation scheduling under wind uncertainty. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2018, 33: 2087–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Li Z G, Wu W C, Shahidehpour M, et al. Combined heat and power dispatch considering pipeline energy storage of district heating network. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2016, 7: 12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Qin X, Sun H B, Shen X W, et al. A generalized quasi-dynamic model for electric-heat coupling integrated energy system with distributed energy resources. Appl Energy, 2019, 251: 113270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Su H, Zhang J, Zio E, et al. An integrated systemic method for supply reliability assessment of natural gas pipeline networks. Appl Energy, 2018, 209: 489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Fu G, Wilkinson S, Dawson R J, et al. Integrated approach to assess the resilience of future electricity infrastructure networks to climate hazards. IEEE Syst J, 2018, 12: 3169–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Jiang H, Dai X, Gao D W, et al. Spatial-temporal synchrophasor data characterization and analytics in smart grid fault detection, identification, and impact causal analysis. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2016, 7: 2525–2536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Koeppel G, Andersson G. Reliability modeling of multi-carrier energy systems. Energy, 2009, 34: 235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bie Z, Zhang P, Li G, et al. Reliability evaluation of active distribution systems including microgrids. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2012, 27: 2342–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang S, Wen M, Cheng H, et al. Reliability evaluation of electricity-heat integrated energy system with heat pump. CSEE J Power Energy Syst, 2018, 4: 425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Juan Y U, Mengnan M A. Reliability evaluation of integrated electrical and natural-gas system with power-to-gas (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2018, 38: 708–715

    Google Scholar 

  81. Li G, Bie Z, Kou Y, et al. Reliability evaluation of integrated energy systems based on smart agent communication. Appl Energy, 2016, 167: 397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Li G, Bie Z, Wang R. Research status and prospects on reliability evaluation of integrated energy system (in Chinese). High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43: 114–121

    Google Scholar 

  83. Chen S, Wei Z, Sun G, et al. Probabilistic energy flow analysis in integrated electricity and natural-gas energy systems (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2015, 35: 6331–6340

    Google Scholar 

  84. Qin Z L, Li W Y, Xiong X. Incorporating multiple correlations among wind speeds, photovoltaic powers and bus loads in composite system reliability evaluation. Appl Energy, 2013, 110: 285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Martinez-Velasco J, Guerra G. Reliability analysis of distribution systems with photovoltaic generation using a power flow simulator and a parallel monte carlo approach. Energies, 2016, 9: 537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Krause T, Andersson G, Fröhlich K, et al. Multiple-energy carriers: modeling of production, delivery, and consumption. Proc IEEE, 2011, 99: 15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Zhao C W, Zhang H Y. Hierarchical decoupling optimal load curtailment algorithm for integrated energy systems reliability evaluation (in Chinese). J Global Energy Interconnection, 2019, 2: 538–546

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lei Y K, Hou K, Wang Y, et al. A new reliability assessment approach for integrated energy systems: using hierarchical decoupling optimization framework and impact-increment based state enumeration method. Appl Energy, 2018, 210: 1237–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ge S Y, Li J F, Liu H, et al. Reliability evaluation of microgrid containing energy storage system considering multi-energy coupling and grade difference (in Chinese). Automation Electr Power Syst, 2018, 42: 165–173

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lu H C, Xie K G, Wang X B. Reliability assessment of multi-energy system considering multi-storage and integrated demand response (in Chinese). Electr Power Autom Equip, 2019, 39: 72–79

    Google Scholar 

  91. Shariatkhah M H, Haghifam M R, Parsa-Moghaddam M, et al. Modeling the reliability of multi-carrier energy systems considering dynamic behavior of thermal loads. Energy Buildings, 2015, 103: 375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Tierney K, Bruneau M. Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: a key to disaster loss reduction. TR News, 2007, 250: 14–17

    Google Scholar 

  93. Panteli M, Trakas D N, Mancarella P, et al. Power systems resilience assessment: hardening and smart operational enhancement strategies. Proc IEEE, 2017, 105: 1202–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Shinozuka M, Chang S E, Cheng T, et al. Resilience of integrated power and water systems. Seism Eval Retrofit Lifeline Syst, 2003: 65–86

  95. Poljanšek K, Bono F, Gutiérrez E. Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: the case of European gas and electricity networks. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn, 2012, 41: 61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Ndiaye A, Kébé C M F, Ndiaye P A, et al. A novel method for investigating photovoltaic module degradation. Energy Procedia, 2013, 36: 1222–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Arcak M, Gorgun H, Pedersen L M, et al. A nonlinear observer design for fuel cell hydrogen estimation. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2004, 12: 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Zhao Y, Li T, Zhang X, et al. Artificial intelligence-based fault detection and diagnosis methods for building energy systems: advantages, challenges and the future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2019, 109: 85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Tayeb E B M, Rhim O A A A. Transmission line faults detection, classification and location using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of 2011 International Conference & Utility Exhibition on Power and Energy Systems: Issues and Prospects for Asia (ICUE), 2011. 1–5

  100. Wang A, Luo Y, Tu G, et al. Vulnerability assessment scheme for power system transmission networks based on the fault chain theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2011, 26: 442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Eppstein M J, Hines P D H. A “Random Chemistry” algorithm for identifying collections of multiple contingencies that initiate cascading failure. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2012, 27: 1698–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Mei S W, He F, Zhang X M, et al. An improved OPA model and blackout risk assessment. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2009, 24: 814–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Chen J, Thorp J S, Dobson I. Cascading dynamics and mitigation assessment in power system disturbances via a hidden failure model. Int J Electrical Power Energy Syst, 2005, 27: 318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Guo H, Yu S S, Iu H H C, et al. A complex network theory analytical approach to power system cascading failure-from a cyber-physical perspective. Chaos, 2019, 29: 053111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  105. Xue F, Bompard E, Huang T, et al. Interrelation of structure and operational states in cascading failure of overloading lines in power grids. Phys A-Stat Mech Its Appl, 2017, 482: 728–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Bao Z J, Jiang Z W, Wu L. Evaluation of bi-directional cascading failure propagation in integrated electricity-natural gas system. Int J Electr Power & Energy Syst, 2020, 121: 106045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Pan Y, Mei F, Zhou C, et al. Analysis on integrated energy system cascading failures considering interaction of coupled heating and power networks. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 89752–89765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Yang J, Kong W K. Application of intelligent algorithms to service restoration of distribution network with distributed generations (in Chinese). Control Decision, 2019, 34: 1809–1818

    Google Scholar 

  109. Yuan C, Illindala M S, Khalsa A S. Modified viterbi algorithm based distribution system restoration strategy for grid resiliency. IEEE Trans Power Deliver, 2017, 32: 310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Abbasi S, Barati M, Lim G J. A parallel sectionalized restoration scheme for resilient smart grid systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 1660–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Wang L, Chen D W. Energy optimization strategy for integrated energy system considering energy storage thermal inertia (in Chinese). Telecommun Sci, 2019, 35: 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  112. Chen W, Ding X. Sequential fault restoration method for electricity-gas integrated energy system considering two-way coupling (in Chinese). Electr Power Autom Equip, 2019, 39: 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  113. Liu Y, Su Y, Xiang Y, et al. Operational reliability assessment for gas-electric integrated distribution feeders. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 1091–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Yu J, Guo L, Ma M, et al. Risk assessment of integrated electrical, natural gas and district heating systems considering solar thermal CHP plants and electric boilers. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2018, 103: 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Zeng Z, Ding T, Xu Y, et al. Reliability evaluation for integrated power-gas systems with power-to-gas and gas storages. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2020, 35: 571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Teh J, Cotton I. Reliability impact of dynamic thermal rating system in wind power integrated network. IEEE Trans Rel, 2016, 65: 1081–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Lin Y, Bie Z. Study on the resilience of the integrated energy system. Energy Procedia, 2016, 103: 171–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Ouyang M, Dueñas-Osorio L. Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems. Struct Saf, 2014, 48: 15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Ouyang M, Duenñas-Osorio L, Min X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Struct Saf, 2012, 36–37: 23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Panteli M, Mancarella P, Trakas D N, et al. Metrics and quantification of operational and infrastructure resilience in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2017, 32: 4732–4742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Whitson J C, Ramirez-Marquez J E. Resiliency as a component importance measure in network reliability. Reliability Eng Syst Saf, 2009, 94: 1685–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Maliszewski P J, Perrings C. Factors in the resilience of electrical power distribution infrastructures. Appl Geogr, 2012, 32: 668–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Hare J, Shi X, Gupta S, et al. Fault diagnostics in smart micro-grids: a survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2016, 60: 1114–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Pahwa S, Scoglio C, Scala A. Abruptness of cascade failures in power grids. Sci Rep, 2015, 4: 3694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Kouadri A, Hajji M, Harkat M F, et al. Hidden Markov model based principal component analysis for intelligent fault diagnosis of wind energy converter systems. Renew Energy, 2020, 150: 598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Chao K H, Ho S H, Wang M H. Modeling and fault diagnosis of a photovoltaic system. Electric Power Syst Res, 2008, 78: 97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Chao K H, Chen C T, Wang M H, et al. A novel fault diagnosis method based-on modified neural networks for photovoltaic systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference in Swarm Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 2010. 531–539

    Google Scholar 

  128. Luo X H, Tong X Y. Structure-variable Bayesian network for power system fault diagnosis considering credibility (in Chinese). Power Syst Technol, 2015, 39: 2658–2664

    Google Scholar 

  129. Zhao W, Bai X M, Ding J, et al. A new fault diagnosis approach of power grid based on cooperative expert system and multi-agent technology (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2006, 26: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  130. Xiong G J, Shi D Y, Chen J F, et al. Divisional fault diagnosis of large-scale power systems based on radial basis function neural network and fuzzy integral. Electric Power Syst Res, 2013, 105: 9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Karami M, Wang L. Fault detection and diagnosis for nonlinear systems: a new adaptive Gaussian mixture modeling approach. Energy Buildings, 2018, 166: 477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Namburu S M, Azam M S, Luo J, et al. Data-driven modeling, fault diagnosis and optimal sensor selection for HVAC chillers. IEEE Trans Automat Sci Eng, 2007, 4: 469–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Xiao F, Ai Q. Data-driven multi-hidden markov model-based power quality disturbance prediction that incorporates weather conditions. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2019, 34: 402–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Sun Z, Jin H, Gu J, et al. Gradual fault early stage diagnosis for air source heat pump system using deep learning techniques. Int J Refrigeration, 2019, 107: 63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Yan W, Yu L. On accurate and reliable anomaly detection for gas turbine combustors: a deep learning approach. 2019. ArXiv:1908.09238

  136. Yu J J Q, Hou Y, Lam A Y S, et al. Intelligent fault detection scheme for microgrids with wavelet-based deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 1694–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Zhang S, Wang Y, Liu M, et al. Data-based line trip fault prediction in power systems using LSTM networks and SVM. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 7675–7686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Wang S, Chen H. A novel deep learning method for the classification of power quality disturbances using deep convolutional neural network. Appl Energy, 2019, 235: 1126–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Bao M L, Yang Y, Ding Y. Assessment of cascading failures in power system considering effects of natural gas system (in Chinese). Power Syst Technol, 2019, 43: 32–40

    Google Scholar 

  140. Fu X, Guo Q, Sun H, et al. Estimation of the failure probability of an integrated energy system based on the first order reliability method. Energy, 2017, 134: 1068–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Huan J J, Sui Y, Zhang X H. Analysis method for cascade failure and fault chain reaction of integrated energy system (in Chinese). Electr Power Construction, 2019, 40: 84–92

    Google Scholar 

  142. Abniki H, Taghvaei S M, Mohammadi-Hosseininejad S M. Reliability improvement in smart grid through incorporating energy storage systems in service restoration. Int Trans Electr Energ Syst, 2019, 29: e2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Akaber P, Moussa B, Debbabi M, et al. Automated post-failure service restoration in smart grid through network reconfiguration in the presence of energy storage systems. IEEE Syst J, 2019, 13: 3358–3367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Yuan G. Improving grid reliability through integration of distributed PV and energy storage. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), 2012. 1–2

  145. Jorge M B, Héctor V O, Miguel L G, et al. Multi-fault service restoration in distribution networks considering the operating mode of distributed generation. Electric Power Syst Res, 2014, 116: 67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Golshani A, Sun W, Zhou Q, et al. Two-stage adaptive restoration decision support system for a self-healing power grid. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2017, 13: 2802–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Shen C, Kaufmann P, Hachmann C, et al. Three-stage power system restoration methodology considering renewable energies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2018, 94: 287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Ren Y, Fan D, Feng Q, et al. Agent-based restoration approach for reliability with load balancing on smart grids. Appl Energy, 2019, 249: 46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Meskina S B, Doggaz N, Khalgui M, et al. Multiagent framework for smart grids recovery. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2017, 47: 1284–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Jiang Z, Chen X, Tang M. A supervisory control strategy for the detection and restoration of power transmission failures during peak periods using Petri nets. Adv Mech Eng, 2017, 9: 168781401773324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Jiang Z, Li Z, Wu N, et al. A Petri net approach to fault diagnosis and restoration for power transmission systems to avoid the output interruption of substations. IEEE Syst J, 2018, 12: 2566–2576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Bravo R, Ortiz C, Chacartegui R, et al. Hybrid solar power plant with thermochemical energy storage: a multi-objective operational optimisation. Energy Convers Manage, 2020, 205: 112421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Aissaoui A G, Tahour A, Essounbouli N, et al. A fuzzy-PI control to extract an optimal power from wind turbine. Energy Convers Manage, 2013, 65: 688–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Asl H J, Yoon J. Power capture optimization of variable-speed wind turbines using an output feedback controller. Renew Energy, 2016, 86: 517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Pradhan R, Subudhi B. Double integral sliding mode MPPT control of a photovoltaic system. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2016, 24: 285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Wang C, Hong B, Guo L, et al. A general modeling method for optimal dispatch of combined cooling, heating and power microgrid (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2013, 33: 26–33, 3

    Google Scholar 

  157. Mago P J, Chamra L M, Ramsay J. Micro-combined cooling, heating and power systems hybrid electric-thermal load following operation. Appl Thermal Eng, 2010, 30: 800–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Wu J Y, Wang J L, Li S. Multi-objective optimal operation strategy study of micro-CCHP system. Energy, 2012, 48: 472–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Liu J, Sun W, Harrison G P. Optimal low-carbon economic environmental dispatch of hybrid electricity-natural gas energy systems considering P2G. Energies, 2019, 12: 1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Chen Z, Wang D, Jia H, et al. Research on optimal day-ahead economic dispatching strategy for microgrid considering P2G and multi-source energy storage system (in Chinese). Proc CSEE, 2017, 37: 3067–3077, 3362

    Google Scholar 

  161. Pazouki S, Haghifam M R, Moser A. Uncertainty modeling in optimal operation of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2014, 61: 335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Mohammadi S, Soleymani S, Mozafari B. Scenario-based stochastic operation management of MicroGrid including Wind, Photovoltaic, Micro-Turbine, Fuel Cell and Energy Storage Devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst, 2014, 54: 525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Wang L H, Li Q Q, Sun M S, et al. Robust optimisation scheduling of CCHP systems with multi-energy based on minimax regret criterion. IET Gener Transm Distrib, 2016, 10: 2194–2201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Luo Z, Gu W, Wu Z, et al. A robust optimization method for energy management of CCHP microgrid. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy, 2018, 6: 132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Luo Z, Wu Z, Li Z, et al. A two-stage optimization and control for CCHP microgrid energy management. Appl Thermal Eng, 2017, 125: 513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Mohan V, Singh J G, Ongsakul W. An efficient two stage stochastic optimal energy and reserve management in a microgrid. Appl Energy, 2015, 160: 28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Moeini-Aghtaie M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, et al. A decomposed solution to multiple-energy carriers optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2014, 29: 707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Li J Q, Jin X, Xiong R. Multi-objective optimal energy management strategy and economic analysis for an range-extended electric bus. Energy Procedia, 2016, 88: 814–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Shu K, Ai X, Fang J, et al. Real-time subsidy based robust scheduling of the integrated power and gas system. Appl Energy, 2019, 236: 1158–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Liu C, Shahidehpour M, Wang J. Coordinated scheduling of electricity and natural gas infrastructures with a transient model for natural gas flow. Chaos, 2011, 21: 025102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Golmohamadi H, Keypour R, Bak-Jensen B, et al. Robust self-scheduling of operational processes for industrial demand response aggregators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2020, 67: 1387–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Ramin D, Spinelli S, Brusaferri A. Demand-side management via optimal production scheduling in power-intensive industries: the case of metal casting process. Appl Energy, 2018, 225: 622–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Zhang X, Hug G, Kolter J Z, et al. Demand response of ancillary service from industrial loads coordinated with energy storage. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2018, 33: 951–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Paterakis N G, Erdinc O, Bakirtzis A G, et al. Load-following reserves procurement considering flexible demand-side resources under high wind power penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2015, 30: 1337–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Wang Z, Chen B, Wang J, et al. Coordinated energy management of networked microgrids in distribution systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2015, 6: 45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Kou P, Liang D, Gao L. Distributed EMPC of multiple microgrids for coordinated stochastic energy management. Appl Energy, 2017, 185: 939–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Wang D, Guan X, Wu J, et al. Integrated energy exchange scheduling for multimicrogrid system with electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2016, 7: 1762–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Asimakopoulou G E, Dimeas A L, Hatziargyriou N D. Leader-follower strategies for energy management of multi-microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2013, 4: 1909–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Ma L, Liu N, Wang L, et al. Multi-party energy management for smart building cluster with PV systems using automatic demand response. Energy Buildings, 2016, 121: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Lv T, Ai Q. Interactive energy management of networked microgrids-based active distribution system considering large-scale integration of renewable energy resources. Appl Energy, 2016, 163: 408–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Fathi M, Bevrani H. Statistical cooperative power dispatching in interconnected microgrids. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2013, 4: 586–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Wang Z, Chen B, Wang J, et al. Networked microgrids for self-healing power systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2016, 7: 310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. Wang T, Yin Z, Tan C Q, et al. High-power mode control for triaxial gas turbines with variable power turbine guide vanes. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2019, 86: 132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Olumayegun O, Wang M, Kelsall G. Closed-cycle gas turbine for power generation: a state-of-the-art review. Fuel, 2016, 180: 694–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Lyden S, Haque M E. A simulated annealing global maximum power point tracking approach for PV modules under partial shading conditions. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 2016, 31: 4171–4181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Chao K H, Lin Y S, Lai U D. Improved particle swarm optimization for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic module arrays. Appl Energy, 2015, 158: 609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. Tran V T, Muttaqi K M, Sutanto D. A robust power management strategy with multi-mode control features for an integrated PV and energy storage system to take the advantage of ToU electricity pricing. IEEE Trans Ind Appl, 2018, 55: 2110–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Kim S T, Bae S H, Kang Y C, et al. Energy management based on the photovoltaic HPCS with an energy storage device. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 4608–4617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Bao Z, Zhou Q, Yang Z, et al. A multi time-scale and multi energy-type coordinated microgrid scheduling solution-Part I: model and methodology. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2015, 30: 2257–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Li L L, Wen S Y, Tseng M L, et al. Renewable energy prediction: a novel short-term prediction model of photovoltaic output power. J Cleaner Production, 2019, 228: 359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Chaouachi A, Kamel R M, Andoulsi R, et al. Multiobjective intelligent energy management for a microgrid. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2013, 60: 1688–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Palma-Behnke R, Benavides C, Lanas F, et al. A microgrid energy management system based on the rolling horizon strategy. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2013, 4: 996–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Motevasel M, Seifi A R. Expert energy management of a micro-grid considering wind energy uncertainty. Energy Convers Manage, 2014, 83: 58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Kampelis N, Tsekeri E, Kolokotsa D, et al. Development of demand response energy management optimization at building and district levels using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network modelling power predictions. Energies, 2018, 11: 3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Reynolds J, Ahmad M W, Rezgui Y, et al. Operational supply and demand optimisation of a multi-vector district energy system using artificial neural networks and a genetic algorithm. Appl Energy, 2019, 235: 699–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Yao E, Wang H, Wang L, et al. Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power based compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manage, 2017, 138: 199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Jadidbonab M, Babaei E, Mohammadi-ivatloo B. CVaR-constrained scheduling strategy for smart multi carrier energy hub considering demand response and compressed air energy storage. Energy, 2019, 174: 1238–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Labidi M, Eynard J, Faugeroux O, et al. Sequential management of optimally-designed thermal storage tanks for multi-energy district boilers. Appl Thermal Eng, 2014, 73: 253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Cao J, Crozier C, McCulloch M, et al. Optimal design and operation of a low carbon community based multi-energy systems considering EV integration. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2019, 10: 1217–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. Li B, Roche R, Paire D, et al. Coordinated scheduling of a gas/electricity/heat supply network considering temporal-spatial electric vehicle demands. Electric Power Syst Res, 2018, 163: 382–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Zhang X, Shahidehpour M, Alabdulwahab A, et al. Hourly electricity demand response in the stochastic day-ahead scheduling of coordinated electricity and natural gas networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2016, 31: 592–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Shao C, Wang X, Shahidehpour M, et al. An MILP-based optimal power flow in multicarrier energy systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2017, 8: 239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Liu W, Zhan J, Chung C Y, et al. Day-ahead optimal operation for multi-energy residential systems with renewables. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2019, 10: 1927–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. Fang J, Zeng Q, Ai X, et al. Dynamic optimal energy flow in the integrated natural gas and electrical power systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 2018, 9: 188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Zhang X, Hug G, Harjunkoski I. Cost-effective scheduling of steel plants with flexible EAFs. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2017, 8: 239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Ding Y M, Hong S H, Li X H. A demand response energy management scheme for industrial facilities in smart grid. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2014, 10: 2257–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Marzband M, Parhizi N, Savaghebi M, et al. Distributed smart decision-making for a multimicrogrid system based on a hierarchical interactive architecture. IEEE Trans Energy Convers, 2016, 31: 637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Du Y, Wang Z, Liu G, et al. A cooperative game approach for coordinating multi-microgrid operation within distribution systems. Appl Energy, 2018, 222: 383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Choobineh M, Mohagheghi S. Robust optimal energy pricing and dispatch for a multi-microgrid industrial park operating based on just-in-time strategy. IEEE Trans Ind Applicat, 2019, 55: 3321–3330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Zhang B, Li Q, Wang L, et al. Robust optimization for energy transactions in multi-microgrids under uncertainty. Appl Energy, 2018, 217: 346–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  211. Chen Q, Hao J H, Chen L, et al. Integral transport model for energy of electric-thermal integrated energy system (in Chinese). Autom Electr Power Syst, 2017, 41: 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  212. Tan Y H, Wang X, Zheng Y H. A new modeling and solution method for optimal energy flow in electricity-gas integrated energy system. Int J Energy Res, 2019, 43: 4322–4343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. Whalley R, Abdul-Ameer A. Energy-efficient gas pipeline transportation. Syst Sci Control Eng, 2014, 2: 527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Yang J W, Zhang N, Botterud A, et al. Situation awareness of electricity-gas coupled systems with a multi-port equivalent gas network model. Appl Energy, 2020, 258: 114029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Yang J W, Zhang N, Botterud A, et al. On an equivalent representation of the dynamics in district heating networks for combined electricity-heat operation. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2020, 35: 560–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. Guo Z Y, Zhu H Y, Liang X G. Entransy—a physical quantity describing heat transfer ability. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2007, 50: 2545–2556

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  217. Pedrycz W. Granular computing for data analytics: a manifesto of human-centric computing. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin, 2018, 5: 1025–1034

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  218. Venayagamoorthy G K, Sharma R K, Gautam P K, et al. Dynamic energy management system for a smart microgrid. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2016, 27: 1643–1656

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  219. Wei Q, Liu D, Shi G, et al. Multibattery optimal coordination control for home energy management systems via distributed iterative adaptive dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2015, 62: 4203–4214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  220. Zeng P, Li H, He H, et al. Dynamic energy management of a microgrid using approximate dynamic programming and deep recurrent neural network learning. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2019, 10: 4435–4445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Pan S J, Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2010, 22: 1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0700300), National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61833003, 61533005, U1908218), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. DUT18TD07), and Outstanding Youth Sci-Tech Talent Program of Dalian (Grant No. 2018RJ01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Optimization for Industrial Equipment (Dalian University of Technology), Ministry of Education, Dalian, 116024, China

    Jun Zhao, Long Chen & Quanli Liu

  2. School of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    Jun Zhao, Long Chen & Quanli Liu

  3. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Yinan Wang

Authors
  1. Jun Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Long Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yinan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Quanli Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Chen, L., Wang, Y. et al. A review of system modeling, assessment and operational optimization for integrated energy systems. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 64, 191201 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3176-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3176-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation