Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced memory capacity of a neuromorphic reservoir computing system based on a VCSEL with double optical feedbacks

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a neuromorphic reservoir computing (RC) system with enhanced memory capacity (MC) based on a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) subject to double optical feedbacks (DOF) is proposed and investigated numerically. The aim of this study is to explore the MC of the proposed system. For the purpose of comparison, the MC of the VCSEL-based RC system with single optical feedback (SOF) is also taken into account. It is found that, compared with the VCSEL-based RC system subject to SOF, enhanced MC can be obtained for the VCSEL-based RC system with DOF. Besides, the effects of feedback strength, injected strength, frequency detuning as well as injection current on the MC of the VCSEL-based RC system with DOF are considered. Moreover, the influence of feedback delays is also carefully examined. Thus, such proposed VCSEL-based RC system with DOF provides a prospect for the further development of the neuromorphic photonic system based on RC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maass W, Natschläger T, Markram H. Real-time computing without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based on perturbations. Neural Comput, 2002, 14: 2531–2560

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaeger H, Haas H. Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science, 2004, 304: 78–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verstraeten D, Schrauwen B, Stroobandt D, et al. Isolated word recognition with the liquid state machine: a case study. Inf Process Lett, 2005, 95: 521–528

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Verstraeten D, Schrauwen B, Stroobandt D. Reservoir-based techniques for speech recognition. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2006. 1050–1053

  5. Martinenghi R, Rybalko S, Jacquot M, et al. Photonic nonlinear transient computing with multiple-delay wavelength dynamics. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 108: 244101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vinckier Q, Duport F, Smerieri A, et al. High-performance photonic reservoir computer based on a coherently driven passive cavity. Optica, 2015, 2: 438–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Argyris A, Bueno J, Fischer I. PAM-4 transmission at 1550 nm using photonic reservoir computing post-processing. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 37017–37025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yue D Z, Wu Z M, Hou Y S, et al. Performance optimization research of reservoir computing system based on an optical feedback semiconductor laser under electrical information injection. Opt Express, 2019, 27: 19931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jalalvand A, Vandersmissen B, Neve W De, et al. Radar signal processing for human identification by means of reservoir computing networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf19), 2019. 1–6

  10. Antonik P, Marsal N, Rontani D. Large-scale spatiotemporal photonic reservoir computer for image classification. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2020, 26: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jüngling T, Lymburn T, Stemler T, et al. Reconstruction of complex dynamical systems from time series using reservoir computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2019. 1–5

  12. Pathak J, Hunt B, Girvan M, et al. Model-free prediction of large spatiotemporally chaotic systems from data: a reservoir computing approach. Phys Rev Lett, 2018, 120: 024102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verstraeten D, Schrauwen B, D’Haene M, et al. An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods. Neural Netw, 2007, 20: 391–403

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Appeltant L, Soriano M C, van der Sande G, et al. Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system. Nat Commun, 2011, 2: 468–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Larger L, Soriano M C, Brunner D, et al. Photonic information processing beyond Turing: an optoelectronic implementation of reservoir computing. Opt Express, 2012, 20: 3241–3249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paquot Y, Duport F, Smerieri A, et al. Optoelectronic reservoir computing. Sci Rep, 2012, 2: 287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duport F, Schneider B, Smerieri A, et al. All-optical reservoir computing. Opt Express, 2012, 20: 22783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunner D, Soriano M C, Mirasso C R, et al. Parallel photonic information processing at gigabyte per second data rates using transient states. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 1364–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguimdo R M, Lacot E, Jacquin O, et al. Prediction performance of reservoir computing systems based on a diode-pumped erbium-doped microchip laser subject to optical feedback. Opt Lett, 2017, 42: 375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bueno J, Brunner D, Soriano M C, et al. Conditions for reservoir computing performance using semiconductor lasers with delayed optical feedback. Opt Express, 2017, 25: 2401–2412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuriki Y, Nakayama J, Takano K, et al. Impact of input mask signals on delay-based photonic reservoir computing with semiconductor lasers. Opt Express, 2018, 26: 5777–5788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguimdo R M, Erneux T. Enhanced performances of a photonic reservoir computer based on a single delayed quantum cascade laser. Opt Lett, 2019, 44: 49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sugano C, Kanno K, Uchida A. Reservoir computing using multiple lasers with feedback on a photonic integrated circuit. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2020, 26: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koyama F. Recent advances of VCSEL photonics. J Lightw Technol, 2006, 24: 4502–4513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiang S Y, Ren Z, Zhang Y, et al. All-optical neuromorphic XOR operation with inhibitory dynamics of a single photonic spiking neuron based on VCSEL-SA. Opt Lett, 2020, 45: 1104–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vatin J, Rontani D, Sciamanna M. Enhanced performance of a reservoir computer using polarization dynamics in VCSELs. Opt Lett, 2018, 43: 4497–4500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vatin J, Rontani D, Sciamanna M. Experimental reservoir computing using VCSEL polarization dynamics. Opt Express, 2019, 27: 18579–18584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo X X, Xiang S Y, Zhang Y H, et al. Four-channels reservoir computing based on polarization dynamics in mutually coupled VCSELs system. Opt Express, 2019, 27: 23293–23306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo X X, Xiang S Y, Zhang Y H, et al. Polarization multiplexing reservoir computing based on a VCSEL with polarized optical feedback. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2020, 26: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jaeger H. Short term memory in echo state networks. GMD Rep, 2002, 152: 60

    Google Scholar 

  31. Inubushi M, Yoshimura K. Reservoir computing beyond memory-nonlinearity trade-off. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 10199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lazar A, Pipa G, Triesch J. Fading memory and time series prediction in recurrent networks with different forms of plasticity. Neural Netw, 2007, 20: 312–322

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Hou Y S, Xia G Q, Yang W Y, et al. Prediction performance of reservoir computing system based on a semiconductor laser subject to double optical feedback and optical injection. Opt Express, 2018, 26: 10211–10219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiang S Y, Zhang Y, Guo X, et al. Photonic generation of neuron-like dynamics using VCSELs subject to double polarized optical injection. J Lightw Technol, 2018, 36: 4227–4234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiang S Y, Zhang Y, Gong J, et al. STDP based unsupervised spike pattern learning in a photonic spiking neural network with VCSELs and VCSOAs. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2019, 25: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tezuka M, Kanno K, Bunsen M. Reservoir computing with a slowly modulated mask signal for preprocessing using a mutually coupled optoelectronic system. Jpn J Appl Phys, 2016, 55: 08RE06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hicke K, Escalona-Moran M A, Brunner D, et al. Information processing using transient dynamics of semiconductor lasers subject to delayed feedback. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2013, 19: 1501610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin-Regalado J, Prati F, San Miguel M, et al. Polarization properties of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 1997, 33: 765–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang N, Pan W, Luo B, et al. Bidirectional dual-channel communication based on polarization-division-multiplexed chaos synchronization in mutually coupled VCSELs. IEEE Photon Technol Lett, 2012, 24: 1094–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li N, Susanto H, Cemlyn B R, et al. Stability and bifurcation analysis of spin-polarized vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. Phys Rev A, 2017, 96: 013840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng T, Robertson J, Hurtado A. Controlled propagation of spiking dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers: towards neuromorphic photonic networks. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 2017, 23: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  42. Deng T, Robertson J, Wu Z M, et al. Stable propagation of inhibited spiking dynamics in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers for neuromorphic photonic networks. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 67951–67958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiang N, Zhao A, Xue C, et al. Physical secure optical communication based on private chaotic spectral phase encryption/decryption. Opt Lett, 2019, 44: 1536–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nguimdo R M, Verschaffelt G, Danckaert J, et al. Reducing the phase sensitivity of laser-based optical reservoir computing systems. Opt Express, 2016, 24: 1238–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo X X, Xiang S Y, Zhang Y H, et al. Information-theory-based complexity quantifier for chaotic semiconductor laser with double time delays. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 2018, 54: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu J G, Xia G Q, Wu Z M. Suppression of time delay signatures of chaotic output in a semiconductor laser with double optical feedback. Opt Express, 2009, 17: 20124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liao Y H, Lin F Y. Dynamical characteristics and their applications of semiconductor lasers subject to both optical injection and optical feedback. Opt Express, 2013, 21: 23568–23578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Li N, Susanto H, Cemlyn B, et al. Injection locking of two laterally-coupled semiconductor laser arrays. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, 2018. 106820Z

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB2200500) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61974177, 61674119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuiying Xiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Xiang, S., Zhang, Y. et al. Enhanced memory capacity of a neuromorphic reservoir computing system based on a VCSEL with double optical feedbacks. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63, 160407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-2862-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-2862-7

Keywords

Navigation