Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design and analysis of a whole-body controller for a velocity controlled robot mobile manipulator

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile manipulators, which are intrinsically redundant when the manipulator and mobile base are moving together, are known for their capabilities to carry out multiple tasks at the same time. This paper presents a whole-body control framework, inspired by legged bio-robots, for a velocity controlled non-holonomic mobile manipulator based on task priority. Control primitives, such as manipulability optimization, trajectory tracking of the end-effector and mobile base, and collision avoidance, are considered in the framework and arranged at different priorities. Lower priority tasks are projected into the null space of control tasks with higher priorities. As a result, lower level tasks are completed without affecting the performance of higher priority tasks. Several experiments are implemented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed controller. The proposed method is proved to be an effective way to solve the whole-body control problem of velocity controlled mobile manipulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metta G, Natale L, Nori F, et al. The iCub humanoid robot: an open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Netw, 2010, 23: 1125–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Wang X, Li Z, et al. Overview of gait synthesis for the humanoid COMAN. J Bionic Eng, 2017, 14: 15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakagami Y, Watanabe R, Aoyama C, et al. The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2002. 2478–2483

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishiwaki K, Kagami S, Inoue H. Object manipulation by hand using whole-body motion coordination. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Automation, 2005. 1778–1783

    Google Scholar 

  5. He W, Zhang S. Control design for nonlinear flexible wings of a robotic aircraft. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2017, 25: 351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo W, Cai C, Li M, et al. A parallel actuated pantograph leg for high-speed locomotion. J Bionic Eng, 2017, 14: 202–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robuffo G P, Fuchs M, Alin A S, et al. On the kinematic modeling and control of a mobile platform equipped with steering wheels and movable legs. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. 4080–4087

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asfour T, Regenstein K, Azad P, et al. ARMAR-III: an integrated humanoid platform for sensory-motor control. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2006. 169–175

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruggiero F, Petit A, Serra D, et al. Nonprehensile manipulation of deformable objects: achievements and perspectives from the robotic dynamic manipulation project. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2018, 25: 83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellekilde L P, Christensen H I. Control of mobile manipulation using the dynamical systems approach. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. 1370–1376

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hvilshøj M, Bøgh S, Madsen O, et al. The mobile robot “Little Helper”: concepts, ideas and working principles. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, 2009. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen J, Kai S X. Cooperative transportation control of multiple mobile manipulators through distributed optimization. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 120201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tao B, Zhao X W, Ding H. Mobile-robotic machining for large complex components: a review study. Sci China Technol Sci, 2019, 62: 1388–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen F, Selvaggio M, Caldwell D G. Dexterous grasping by manipulability selection for mobile manipulator with visual guidance. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2019, 15: 1202–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen F, Gao B, Selvaggio M, et al. A framework of teleoperated and sterio vision guided mobile manipulation for industrial automation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, 2016. 1641–1648

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siciliano B, Sciavicco L, Villani L, et al. Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. London: Springer, 2009. 502–506

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Siciliano B, Slotine J J E. A general framework for managing multiple tasks in highly redundant robotic systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics, 1991. 1211–1216

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura Y, Hanafusa H, Yoshikawa T. Task-priority based control of robot manipulators. Int J Robot Res, 1987, 6: 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khatib O, Sentis L, Park J, et al. Whole-body dynamic behavior and control of human-like robots. Int J Human Robot, 2004, 1: 29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sentis L, Khatib O. Synthesis of whole-body behaviors through hierarchical control of behavioral primitives. Int J Human Robot, 2005, 2: 505–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sentis L, Khatib O. A whole-body control framework for humanoids operating in human environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. 2641–2647

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mansard N, Khatib O, Kheddar A. A unified approach to integrate unilateral constraints in the stack of tasks. IEEE Trans Robot, 2009, 25: 670–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietrich A, Thomas W, Alin A S. Dynamic whole-body mobile manipulation with a torque controlled humanoid robot via impedance control laws. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2011. 3199–3206

    Google Scholar 

  24. Borst C, Thomas W, Schmidt F, et al. Rollin’ Justin-mobile platform with variable base. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009. 1597–1598

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dietrich A, Bussmann K, Petit F, et al. Whole-body impedance control of wheeled mobile manipulators. Auton Robot, 2016, 40: 505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fonseca M D P A, Adorno B V. Whole-body modeling and hierarchical control of a humanoid robot based on dual quaternion algebra. In: Proceedings of XIII Latin American Robotics Symposium and IV Brazilian Robotics Symposium (LARS/SBR), 2016. 505–517

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silva F F A, Adorno B V. Whole-body control of a mobile manipulator using feedback linearization and dual quaternion algebra. J Intell Robot Syst, 2018, 91: 249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seraji H. An on-line approach to coordinated mobility and manipulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1993. 28–35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan J, Xi N. Unified model approach for planning and control of mobile manipulators. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2001. 3145–3152

    Google Scholar 

  30. Brock O, Khatib O, Viji S. Task-consistent obstacle avoidance and motion behavior for mobile manipulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Interantional Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002. 388–393

    Google Scholar 

  31. Avanzini G B, Zanchettin A M, Rocco P. Constraint-based model predictive control for holonomic mobile manipulators. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, 2015. 1473–1479

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yamamoto Y, Yun X. Coordinating locomotion and manipulation of a mobile manipulator. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1994, 39: 1326–1332

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Padois V, Fourquet J Y, Chiron P. Kinematic and dynamic model-based control of wheeled mobile manipulators: a unified framework for reactive approaches. Robotica, 2007, 25: 157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baillieul J. Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1985. 722–728

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dietrich A, Ott C, Albu-Schäffer A. An overview of null space projections for redundant, torque-controlled robots. Int J Robot Res, 2015, 34: 1385–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kevin M L, Frank C P. Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 413–420

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gilbert E G, Johnson D W, Keerthi S S. A fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space. IEEE J Robot Automat, 1988, 4: 193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khatib O. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Int J Robot Res, 1986, 5: 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alexander D, Thoms W, Holger T, et al. Extensions to reactive self-collision avoidance for torque and position controlled humanoids. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011. 3445–3462

    Google Scholar 

  40. Merlet J P. Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robots. J Mech Des, 2006, 128: 199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Markus G, Farbod F, Timothy S, et al. Efficient kinematic planning for mobile manipulators with non-holonomic constraints using optimal control. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2017. 3411–3417

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nakanishi J, Cory R, Mistry M, et al. Operational space control: a theoretical and empirical comparison. Int J Robot Res, 2008, 27: 737–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang C, Peng G, Li Y, et al. Neural networks enhanced adaptive admittance control of optimized robot-environment interaction. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2019, 49: 2568–2579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. He W, Dong Y. Adaptive fuzzy neural network control for a constrained robot using impedance learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2018, 29: 1174–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang S, Dong Y, Ouyang Y, et al. Adaptive neural control for robotic manipulators with output constraints and uncertainties. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2018, 29: 5554–5564

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang S, Yang P, Kong L, et al. Neural networks-based fault tolerant control of a robot via fast terminal sliding mode. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2933050

    Google Scholar 

  47. Argall B D, Chernova S, Veloso M, et al. A survey of robot learning from demonstration. Robot Autonom Syst, 2009, 57: 469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang C, Chen C, Wang N, et al. Biologically inspired motion modeling and neural control for robot learning from demonstrations. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst, 2019, 11: 281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61773139), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. KQTD2016112515134654), Shenzhen Special Fund for Future Industrial Development (Grant No. JCYJ20160425150757025), and Open Research Project of the State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, China (Grant No. ICT1900357).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Systems, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China

    Mantian Li, Zeguo Yang, Fusheng Zha & Pengfei Wang

  2. Shenzhen Academy of Aerospace Technology, Shenzhen, 518057, China

    Fusheng Zha & Xin Wang

  3. Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China

    Ping Li & Qinyuan Ren

  4. Active Perception and Robot Interactive Learning Laboratory, Department of Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova 30, 16160, Italy

    Fei Chen

Authors
  1. Mantian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeguo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fusheng Zha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pengfei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qinyuan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fusheng Zha or Fei Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Yang, Z., Zha, F. et al. Design and analysis of a whole-body controller for a velocity controlled robot mobile manipulator. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63, 170204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2741-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2741-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation