Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Natural gait analysis for a biped robot: jogging vs. walking

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Matsuoka K. Mechanisms of frequency and pattern control in the neural rhythm generators. Biol Cybern, 1987, 56: 345–353

  2. 2

    McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res, 1990, 9: 62–82

  3. 3

    Goswami A, Espiau B, Keramane A. Limit cycles in a passive compass gait biped and passivity-mimicking control laws. Auton Robots, 1997, 4: 273–286

  4. 4

    Chen Z, Iwasaki T, Zhu L. Feedback control for natural oscillations of locomotion systems under continuous interactions with environment. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 2015, 23: 1294–1306

  5. 5

    Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation in compass-gait biped robots. In: Proceedings of 2016 Australian Control Conference, 2016. 13

  6. 6

    Koop D, Wu C Q. Passive dynamic biped walking-part I: development and validation of an advanced model. J Comput Nonlin Dynam, 2013, 8: 041007

  7. 7

    Khan U I, Chen Z. Natural oscillation gait in humanoid biped locomotion. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51729501).

Author information

Correspondence to Zhiyong Chen.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, U., Chen, Z. Natural gait analysis for a biped robot: jogging vs. walking. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 229203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9756-9

Download citation