Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A regulated digital currency

Abstract

The decentralized digital currency Bitcoin is an anonymous alternative to the centralized banking system and enjoys widespread and increasing adoption. Since Bitcoin created, many other electronic currencies have been developed. We propose a protocol for an electronic currency for making anonymous payments that can be supervised by an auditor, who has sole access to the transaction history. Other electronic currencies provide only anonymity, which is convenient for making illegal transactions without regulation. For users, miners, and banks, the transactions of our electronic currency are anonymous, and only auditors can see how it is used. We make use of POW (prove-of-work) technique that allows for distributed decisionmaking within a network, namely the Bitcoin blockchain protocol. We combine the POW and blockchain technology of Bitcoin to give better protection against double-spending attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted, 2009. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  2. 2

    Androulaki E, Karame G O, Roeschlin M, et al. Evaluating user privacy in Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2013. 34–51

  3. 3

    McEliece R J, Sarwate D V. On sharing secrets and Reed-Solomon codes. Commun ACM, 1981, 24: 583–584

  4. 4

    Reid F, Harrigan M. An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, 2011. 1318–1326

  5. 5

    Ron D, Shamir A. Quantitative analysis of the full Bitcoin transaction graph. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2013

  6. 6

    Biryukov A, Pustogarov I. Bitcoin over tor isn’t a good idea. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2015. 122–134

  7. 7

    The Guardian. Secrets, lies and Snowden’s email: why I was forced to shut down lavabit. Commun ACM, 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/20/why-did-lavabit-shut-down-snowden-email

  8. 8

    Henze M, Hiller J, Hohlfeld O, et al. Moving privacy-sensitive services from public clouds to decentralized private clouds. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering Workshops, 2016. 130–135

  9. 9

    Ruffing T, Moreno-Sanchez P, Kate A. CoinShuffle: practical decentralized coin mixing for Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 2014

  10. 10

    Meiklejohn S, Pomarole M, Jordan G, et al. A fistful of Bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names. In: Proceedings of Conference on Internet Measurement Conference, 2013. 127–140

  11. 11

    Chainalysis Inc. Chainalysis: blockchain analysis. 2016. https://www.chainalysis.com/

  12. 12

    Elliptic Enterprises Limited. Elliptic: the global standard for blockchain intelligence. 2016. http://www.elliptic.co/

  13. 13

    Barber S, Boyen X, Shi E, et al. Bitter to better–how to make bitcoin a better currency. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2012

  14. 14

    Bissias G, Ozisik A P, Levine B N, et al. Sybil-resistant mixing for Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, 2014. 149–158

  15. 15

    Bonneau J, Narayanan A, Miller A, et al. Mixcoin: anonymity for Bitcoin with accountable mixes. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2014

  16. 16

    Sasson E B, Chiesa A, Garman C, et al. Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2014. 459–474

  17. 17

    Saxena A, Misra J, Dhar A. Increasing anonymity in Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of Financial Cryptography and Data Security Workshop, 2014. 122–139

  18. 18

    Valenta L, Rowan B. Blindcoin: blinded, accountable mixes for Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2015

  19. 19

    Ziegeldorf J H, Grossmann F, Henze M, et al. Coinparty: secure multi-party mixing of Bitcoins. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, 2015

  20. 20

    Miers I, Garman C, Green M, et al. Zerocoin: anonymous distributed e-cash from Bitcoin. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security Privacy, 2013. 397–411

  21. 21

    Maxwell G. Coinjoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world. 2013. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0

  22. 22

    Noether S, Mackenzie A, Monero Research Lab. Ring confidential transactions. Ledger, 2016, 1: 1–18

  23. 23

    Kumar A, Fischer C, Tople S, et al. A traceability analysis of Monero’s blockchain. 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9 9

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0303903), Zhejiang Province Key R&D Project (Grant No. 2017C01062), and National Cryptography Development Fund (Grant No. MMJJ20170121).

Author information

Correspondence to Yanbing Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Fan, H., Wang, X. et al. A regulated digital currency. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 32109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9611-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Blockchain
  • Bitcoin
  • anonymous
  • digital currency
  • regulated
  • proof-of-work