This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1
Mehta U B, Eklund D R, Romero V J, et al. Simulation Credibility: Advances in Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification. NASA Technical Report, NASA/TP-2016-219422, JANNAF/GL-2016-0001, ARC-E-DAA-TN35719, 2016
- 2
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Standard for models and simulations. NASA-STD-7009, 2016
- 3
Babuska I, Oden J T. Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng, 2004, 193: 4057–4066
- 4
Berard B, Bidoit M, Finkel A, et al. Systems and Software Verification: Model-Checking Techniques and Tools. Berlin: Springer, 2013
- 5
Tantithamthavorn C, McIntosh S, Hassan A E, et al. An empirical comparison of model validation techniques for defect prediction models. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2017, 43: 1–18
- 6
Liu H, Zhang J. High dynamic adaptive mobility network model and performance analysis. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2008, 51: 1154–1166
- 7
Li B H, Song X, Zhang L, et al. CoSMSOL: complex system modeling, simulation and optimization language. Int J Model Simul Sci Comput, 2017, 08: 1741002
- 8
Ao D, Hu Z, Mahadevan S. Dynamics model validation using time-domain metrics. J Verif Valid Uncert, 2017, 2: 011004
- 9
Wu Y X, Shen C, Jiang H, et al. Strict pattern matching under non-overlapping condition. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 012101
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61703015).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laili, Y., Zhang, L. & Luo, Y. Pattern-based validation metric for simulation models. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63, 159203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9559-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published: