Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On comparison of modified ADRCs for nonlinear uncertain systems with time delay

  • 133 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

To tackle systems with both uncertainties and time delays, several modified active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) methods, including delayed designed ADRC (DD-ADRC), polynomial based predictive ADRC (PP-ADRC), Smith predictor based ADRC (SP-ADRC) and predictor observer based ADRC (PO-ADRC), have been proposed in the past years. This paper is aimed at rigorously investigating the performance of these modified ADRCs, such that the improvements of each method can be demonstrated. The capability to tackle time delay, the necessity of stable open loop and the performance of rejecting uncertainties for these methods are fully studied and compared. It is proven that large time delay cannot be tolerated for the stability of the closed-loop systems based on DD-ADRC and PP-ADRC. Moreover, stable open loop is shown to be necessary for stabilizing the closed-loop systems based on SP-ADRC. Furthermore, the performance of rejecting the “total disturbance” at low frequency for these modified ADRCs is evaluated and quantitatively discussed. Finally, the simulations of a boiler turbine system illustrate the theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Moore R L. The Dynamic Analysis of Automatic Process Control. Durham: Instrument Society of America, 1985

  2. 2

    Wu X, Shen J, Li Y G, et al. Steam power plant configuration, design, and control. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev Energy Environ, 2015, 4: 537–563

  3. 3

    Niculescu S I. Delay Effects on Stability: a Robust Control Approach. London: Springer, 2001

  4. 4

    Kolmanovskii V, Myshkis A. Introduction to the Theory and Applications of Functional Differential Equations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999

  5. 5

    Smith O J M. Close control of loops with dead time. Chem Eng Prog, 1957, 53: 217–219

  6. 6

    Krstic M. Delay Compensation for Nonlinear, Adaptive, and PDE Systems. Boston: Birkh¨auser, 2009

  7. 7

    Xi Y G, Li D W, Lin S. Model predictive control — status and challenges. Acta Automatica Sin, 2013, 39: 222–236

  8. 8

    Richard J P. Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica, 2003, 39: 1667–1694

  9. 9

    Normey-Rico J E, Camacho E F. Dead-time compensators: a survey. Control Eng Practice, 2008, 16: 407–428

  10. 10

    Palmor Z J, Halevi Y. On the design and properties of multivariable dead time compensators. Automatica, 1983, 19: 255–264

  11. 11

    Mayne D Q, Rawlings J B, Rao C V, et al. Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica, 2000, 36: 789–814

  12. 12

    Zhong Q C, Normey-Rico J E. Control of integral processes with dead-time. Part 1: disturbance observer-based 2DOF control scheme. IEE Proc Control Theor Appl, 2002, 149: 285–290

  13. 13

    Kim S Y, Lee W, Rho M S, et al. Effective dead-time compensation using a simple vectorial disturbance estimator in PMSM drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2010, 57: 1609–1614

  14. 14

    Shimmyo S, Ohnishi K. Disturbance observer for dead-time compensation with variable gain and its stability analysis based on Popov criterion. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Yokohama, 2015. 2550–2555

  15. 15

    Yang J, Li S, Chen X, et al. Disturbance rejection of dead-time processes using disturbance observer and model predictive control. Chem Eng Res Des, 2011, 89: 125–135

  16. 16

    Wang C, Yang J, Zuo Z, et al. Output feedback disturbance rejection for a class of linear systems with input delay via DOBC approach. In: Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference, Chengdu, 2016. 136–141

  17. 17

    Han J. Active disturbance rejection control for time delay systems (in Chinese). Control Eng China, 2008, 15: 7–18

  18. 18

    Tan W, Fu C F. Analysis of active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, 2015. 3962–3967

  19. 19

    Zheng Q, Gao Z. Predictive active disturbance rejection control for processes with time delay. ISA Trans, 2014, 53: 873–881

  20. 20

    Zhao S, Gao Z. Modified active disturbance rejection control for time-delay systems. ISA Trans, 2014, 53: 882–888

  21. 21

    Chen S, Xue W, Huang Y, et al. On comparison between smith predictor and predictor observer based adrcs for nonlinear uncertain systems with output delay. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), Seattle, 2017. 5083–5088

  22. 22

    Xue W C, Liu P, Chen S, et al. On extended state predictor observer based active disturbance rejection control for uncertain systems with sensor delay. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Gyeongju, 2016. 1267–1271

  23. 23

    Han J. From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2009, 56: 900–906

  24. 24

    Xue W, Huang Y. Performance analysis of active disturbance rejection tracking control for a class of uncertain LTI systems. ISA Trans, 2015, 58: 133–154

  25. 25

    Xue W, Huang Y. Performance analysis of 2-DOF tracking control for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems with discontinuous disturbances. Int J Robust NOnlinear Control, 2018, 28: 1456–1473

  26. 26

    Zhao Z L, Guo B Z. A novel extended state observer for output tracking of mimo systems with mismatched uncertainty. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2018, 63: 211–218

  27. 27

    Tan W, Fang F, Tian L, et al. Linear control of a boiler-turbine unit: analysis and design. ISA Trans, 2008, 47: 189–197

  28. 28

    Sbarciog M, de Keyser R, Cristea S, et al. Nonlinear predictive control of processes with variable time delay. A temperature control case study. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA), San Antonio, 2008. 1001–1006

  29. 29

    Normey-Rico J E, Camacho E F. Unified approach for robust dead-time compensator design. J Process Control, 2009, 19: 38–47

  30. 30

    Normey-Rico J E. Control of Dead-Time Processes. London: Springer, 2007

  31. 31

    Wood R K, Berry M W. Terminal composition control of a binary distillation column. Chem Eng Sci, 1973, 28: 1707–1717

  32. 32

    Chen S, Bai W, Huang Y. ADRC for systems with unobservable and unmatched uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Chengdu, 2016. 337–342

  33. 33

    Hang C C, Chin D. Reduced order process modelling in self-tuning control. Automatica, 1991, 27: 529–534

  34. 34

    Halevi Y. Optimal reduced order models with delay. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Brighton, 1991. 602–607

  35. 35

    Gao Z Q. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference (ACC), Denver, 2003. 4989–4996

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61633003-3, 61603380), and National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2014CB845301).

Author information

Correspondence to Wenchao Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Xue, W., Zhong, S. et al. On comparison of modified ADRCs for nonlinear uncertain systems with time delay. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 61, 70223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9403-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • extended state observer
  • active disturbance rejection control
  • uncertain system
  • time delay
  • predictor