Skip to main content
Log in

Situation analytics — at the dawn of a new software engineering paradigm

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I first review the seminal work by Thomas Kuhn — The Structure of Scientific Revolutions — and elaborate my view on paradigm shifts in software engineering research and practice as it turns 50 years old in 2018. I then examine major undertakings of the computing profession since early days of modern computing, especially those done by the software engineering community as a whole. I also enumerate anomalies and crises that occurred at various stages, and the attempts to provide solutions by the software engineering professionals in the past five decades. After providing such a background, I direct readers’ attention toward emerging anomalies in software engineering, at a severity level that is causing another software engineering crisis, and suggest a set of criteria for feasible solutions. The main theme of this paper is to advocate that situation analytics, equipped with necessary definitions of essential concepts including situation and intention as parts of a new computational framework, can serve as the foundation for a new software engineering paradigm named the Situation-Centric Paradigm. In this framework, situation is considered a new abstraction for computing and is clearly differentiated from the widely accepted existing abstractions, namely function and object. I argue that the software engineering professionals will inevitably move into this new paradigm, willingly or unwillingly, to empower Human-Embedded Computing (HEC) and End-User Embedded Computing (EUEC), much more than what they have done with traditional humancentered or user-centric computing altogether. In the end, I speculate that an ultimate agile method may be on the rise, and challenge readers to contemplate “what if” hundreds of thousands “end-user developers” emerge into the scene where the boundaries between end users and developers become much more blurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer F, Bolliet L, Helms H. Report of a conference sponsored by the nato science committee. In: NATO Software Engineering Conference, 1968. 8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu Y, Helal A. Scalable cloud-sensor architecture for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J, 2016, 3: 285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mei H, Huang G, Xie T. Internetware: a software paradigm for internet computing. Computer, 2012, 45: 26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chentouf Z. Cognitive software engineering: a research framework and roadmap. J Softw Eng, 2014, 7: 530–539

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy M R, Umphress D A. People solutions to software problems. CrossTalk, 2011. 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn T S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajlich V. Changing the paradigm of software engineering. Commun ACM, 2006, 49: 67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White A S. An agile project system dynamics simulation model. Int J Inf Technologies Syst Approach, 2014, 7: 55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosling J, Joy B, Steele G L, et al. The Java language specification. Pearson Education, 2014. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Gosling-Java-Language-Specification-Java-SE-8-Edition-The/PGM137443.html

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boehm B W. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 1988, 21: 61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boehm B W. Software Engineering Economicsvolume. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall PTR, 1981. 197

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, et al. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Twelve Principles of Agile Software, 2001. http://agilemanifesto.org/

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwaber K, Beedle M. Agile Software Development With Scrum. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002, 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chang C, Schilit B. Aware computing. Computer, 2014, 47: 20–21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ackoff R L. From data to wisdom. J Appl Syst Analy, 1989, 16: 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rowley J. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J Inf Sci, 2007, 33: 163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang D, Amin M T, Li S, et al. Using humans as sensors: an estimation-theoretic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Berlin, 2014. 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harman M. Software engineering meets evolutionary computation. Computer, 2011, 44: 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Witte R, Sateli B, Khamis N, et al. Intelligent software development environments: integrating natural language processing with the eclipse platform. In: Proceedings of Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 2011. 408–419

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petke J, Haraldsson S, Harman M, et al. Genetic improvement of software: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans Evolution Comput, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neergard L. Obama proposes ‘precision medicine’ to end one-size-fits-all. Drug Discovery and Development, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen H W. There is more to context than location. Comput Graphics, 1999, 23: 893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biferno M A, Stanley D L. The Touch-Sensitive Control/Display Unit: a Promising Computer Interface. Technical Report, SAE Technical Paper. 1983

    Google Scholar 

  24. Endsley M R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors, 1995, 37: 65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Endsley M R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors, 1995, 37: 32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy J. Situation calculus with concurrent events and narrative. 1995. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/narrative.html

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mccarthy J, Hayes P J. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Machine Intelligence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1969. 463–502

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen P R, Morgan J L, Pollack M E. Intentions in Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barwise J, Perry J. The Situation Underground. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barwise J, Perry J. Situations and attitudes. Philpapers, 1991, 25: 743–770

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Haddawy P, Frommberger L, Kauppinen T, et al. Situation awareness in crowdsensing for disease surveillance in crisis situations. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Singapore, 2015. 38

    Google Scholar 

  32. Malle B F, Knobe J. The distinction between desire and intention: a folk-conceptual analysis. In: Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001. 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chang C K, Jiang H, Ming H, et al. Situ: a situation-theoretic approach to context-aware service evolution. IEEE Trans Serv Comput, 2009, 2: 261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang C K. Situation analytics: a foundation for a new software engineering paradigm. Computer, 2016, 49: 24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong J, Yang H I, Chang C K. Identifying factors for human desire inference in smart home environments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics. Berlin: Springer, 2013. 230–237

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xie H, Yang J, Chang C K, et al. A statistical analysis approach to predict user’s changing requirements for software service evolution. J Syst Softw, 2017, 132: 147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jaimes A, Sebe N, Gatica-Perez D. Human-centered computing: a multimedia perspective. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Santa Barbara, 2006. 855–864

    Google Scholar 

  38. Larman C, Basili V R. Iterative and incremental developments: a brief history. Computer, 2003, 36: 47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bullet N S. Essence and accidents of software engineering, fp brooks. IEEE Comput, 1987, 20: 10–19

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bass L, Weber I, Zhu L. DevOps: A Software Architect’s Perspective. Upper Saddle River: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was partially supported by 111 Intelligence Base of High Confidence Software Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl K. Chang.

Additional information

† Invited Paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, C.K. Situation analytics — at the dawn of a new software engineering paradigm. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 61, 050101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9372-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9372-7

Keywords

Navigation