Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Remaining useful life prediction for multi-component systems with hidden dependencies

Abstract

How can we predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of a dynamic system subject to multiple dependent degradations? Is it possible to address the above problem when the degradation information is obtained indirectly? According to a new type of state space-based model, we mainly develop an online RUL prediction method for the above system. In this model, the dependencies among different degradations can be reflected in a diffusion coefficient matrix. Considering that some industrial systems like blast furnaces are usually equipped with multi-sensors, an efficient information fusion strategy also plays an important role in predicting the RUL. Based on multi-dimensional observations, the hidden degradation states are identified through the sequential Kalman filtering. Meanwhile, the unknown parameters in the model are updated iteratively by the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. At last, the RUL distributions are simulated through the Monte Carlo method, in which three types of failure structures with regard to the degradations are considered. The effectiveness of the proposed method is fully verified by a numerical example as well as a case study about the blast furnace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Sikorska J Z, Hodkiewicz M, Ma L. Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2011, 25: 1803–1836

  2. 2

    Okoh C, Roy R, Mehnen J, et al. Overview of remaining useful life prediction techniques in through-life engineering services. Procedia CIRP, 2014, 16: 158–163

  3. 3

    Xi X P, Chen M Y, Zhou D H. Remaining useful life prediction for degradation processes with memory effects. IEEE Trans Rel, 2017, 66: 751–760

  4. 4

    Goebel K F. Management of uncertainty in sensor validation, sensor fusion, and diagnosis of mechanical systems using soft computing techniques. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Berkeley: University of California, 1996

  5. 5

    Ahmadzadeh F, Lundberg J. Remaining useful life estimation: review. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag, 2014, 5: 461–474

  6. 6

    Si X, Wang W, Hu C, et al. Remaining useful life estimation-a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res, 2011, 213: 1–14

  7. 7

    Wei M H, Chen M Y, Zhou D H. Multi-sensor information based remaining useful life prediction with anticipated performance. IEEE Trans Rel, 2013, 62: 183–198

  8. 8

    Niu G, Yang B S. Intelligent condition monitoring and prognostics system based on data-fusion strategy. Expert Syst Appl, 2010, 37: 8831–8840

  9. 9

    Li R, Ryan J K. A Bayesian inventory model using real-time condition monitoring information. Prod Oper Manage, 2011, 20: 754–771

  10. 10

    Tang S, Yu C, Wang X, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on the wiener process with measurement error. Energies, 2014, 7: 520–547

  11. 11

    Bian L, Gebraeel N. Stochastic framework for partially degradation systems with continuous component degradationrate-interactions. Naval Res Log, 2014, 61: 286–303

  12. 12

    Wang X, Guo B, Cheng Z. Residual life estimation based on bivariate Wiener degradation process with measurement errors. J Cent South Univ, 2012, 20: 1844–1851

  13. 13

    Xi Z M, Jing R, Wang P F, et al. A copula-based sampling method for data-driven prognostics. Reliability Eng Syst Saf, 2014, 132: 72–82

  14. 14

    Shi A H, Zeng J C. Real-time prediction of remaining useful life and preventive opportunistic maintenance strategy for multi-component systems considering stochastic dependence. Comput Industrial Eng, 2016, 93: 192–204

  15. 15

    Khorasgani H, Biswas G, Sankararaman S. Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2016, 154: 8–18

  16. 16

    Rodrigues L R. Remaining useful life prediction for multiple-component systems based on a system-level performance indicator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron, 2018, 23: 141–150

  17. 17

    Prakash O, Samantaray A K, Bhattacharyya R. Model-based multi-component adaptive prognosis for hybrid dynamical systems. Control Eng Practice, 2018, 72: 1–18

  18. 18

    Mercier S, Pham H H. A preventive maintenance policy for a continuously monitored system with correlated wear indicators. Eur J Oper Res, 2012, 222: 263–272

  19. 19

    Wang X L, Guo B, Cheng Z J. Residual life estimation based on bivariate Wiener degradation process with time-scale transformations. J Stat Comput Simul, 2014, 84: 545–563

  20. 20

    Wei M H. Multi-sensor monitoring information based remaining useful life prediction for industrial equipments. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2013

  21. 21

    Liao H, Elsayed E A. Reliability inference for field conditions from accelerated degradation testing. Naval Res Log, 2006, 53: 576–587

  22. 22

    Trevisanello L, Meneghini M, Mura G, et al. Accelerated life test of high brightness light emitting diodes. IEEE Trans Device Mater Relib, 2008, 8: 304–311

  23. 23

    Ye Z S, Wang Y, Tsui K L, et al. Degradation data analysis using wiener processes with measurement errors. IEEE Trans Rel, 2013, 62: 772–780

  24. 24

    Wang X, Balakrishnan N, Guo B. Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process. Reliability Eng Syst Saf, 2014, 124: 13–23

  25. 25

    Ye Z S, Chen N, Shen Y. A new class of Wiener process models for degradation analysis. Reliability Eng Syst Saf, 2015, 139: 58–67

  26. 26

    Xi X P, Chen M Y, Zhou D H. Online prognostics based on multiple dependent degradation processes. In: Proceedings of Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM), Harbin, 2017. 1–6

  27. 27

    Kao Y H, van Roy B. Directed principal component analysis. Oper Res, 2014, 62: 957–972

  28. 28

    Tipping M E, Bishop C M. Probabilistic principal component analysis. J R Stat Soc B, 1999, 61: 611–622

  29. 29

    Chui C K, Chen G. Kalman Filtering. Berlin: Springer, 2009

  30. 30

    Shumway R H, Stoffer D S. Time Series Analysis and Its Applications. New York: Springer, 2000

  31. 31

    Houtekamer P L, Mitchell H L. Ensemble Kalman filtering. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 2005, 131: 3269–3289

  32. 32

    Sun S L. Multi-sensor optimal fusion fixed-interval Kalman smoothers. Inf Fusion, 2008, 9: 293–299

  33. 33

    Lemieux C. Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling. New York: Springer, 2009

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61490701, 61290324, 61473164) and Research Fund for the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province of China.

Author information

Correspondence to Maoyin Chen or Donghua Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xi, X., Chen, M. & Zhou, D. Remaining useful life prediction for multi-component systems with hidden dependencies. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 62, 22202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9347-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • remaining useful life
  • hidden dependencies
  • state space model
  • multi-source information fusion
  • failure structure