Advertisement

Review of channel models for deep space communications

  • Xiaohan Pan
  • Yafeng ZhanEmail author
  • Peng Wan
  • Jianhua Lu
Progress

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of channel models for deep space communications. Based on the characteristics of environment, deep space channels can be divided into three kinds, i.e., near Earth link, interstellar link and near planet link. The modeling for different kinds of channels are summarized respectively, and some simulation results are provided in this paper. In addition, according to the development trend of deep space communications, optical wave will become an important carrier in the future. Therefore, deep space optical communication is also briefly introduced. Finally, challenges of deep space channel modeling are pointed out and future research direction is also discussed.

Keywords

deep space communication channel modeling microwave communication optical communication deep space exploration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61671263, 61271265), and Tsinghua University Independent Scientific Research Project (Grant No. 20161080057).

References

  1. 1.
    Liu J X. Forward to the deep space: developing trend of TTC&DT technology. Telecommun Eng, 2006, 2: 1–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Y F, Du J C, Xiao S. Analysis and simulations on characteristics of deep space channel model VPAWGN. Space Electron Technol, 2010, 7: 22–25Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bokulic R S, Moore W V. Near Earth asteroid rendezvous spacecraft solar conjunction experiment. J Spacecr Rockets, 1999, 36: 87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woo R. Radial dependence of solar wind properties deduced from HELIOS 1/2 and pioneer 10/11 radio scattering observation. Astrophys J, 1978, 219: 727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woo R, Yang F C, Ishimaru A. Structure of density fluctuations near the Sun deduced from Pioneer-6 spectral broadening measurements. Astrophys J, 1976, 210: 593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morabito D D, Shambayati S, Finley S, et al. The Cassini May 2000 solar conjunction. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag, 2003, 51: 201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bokulic R S, Flaherty M K E, Jensen J R, et al. The NEAR spacecraft RF telecommunications system. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Digest, 1998, 19: 213–219Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feria Y, Belongie M, Mcpheeters T, et al. Solar Scintillation Effects on Telecommunication Links at Ka-band and X-band. TDA Progress Report 42-129, 1997Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morabito D D. Solar Corona Amplitude Scintillation Modeling and Comparison to Measurements at X-band and Ka-band. IPN Progress Report 42-153, 2003Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu Q, Mei J J, Yao Y L, et al. Analysis of deep space channel model characteristics and its simulation. J Air Force Radar Acad, 2012, 3: 181–184Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu X B, Xu H T, Zhou X W. Research of transmission loss analysis in deep space communication. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cyberspace Technology, Beijing, 2013. 380–383Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu H T, Zhou X W. Ka-band satellite channel model in deep space relaying network. Wirel Pers Commun, 2014, 77: 881–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou H, Zheng H X, Xu D G. Space Communication Technology. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2010. 271–280Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu W Q, Pan C S. An analysis of the factors that may affect the electromagnetic wave propagation in the space communications. Fire Control Command Control, 2004, 21–24Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang G X, Zhang H. Satellite Mobile Communication System. Beijing: Posts and Telecom Press, 2001Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo Y, Zhao W J. Research and implementation of the satellite channel two-state markov model under the cloudy and foggy weather. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Engineering for Mechanics and Materials. Berlin: Springer, 2015Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sun K, Hou X, Zhao Q. Channel modelling and performance analysis of the near space based on the DS signal system. In: Proceedings of MATEC Web of Conferences, Les Ulis, 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perez-Fontan F, Castro M A V, Enjamio C, et al. Comparison of generative statistical models for the LMS channel. In: Proceedings of the 55th Vehicular Technology Conference, Birmingham, 2002. 871–875Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shen D Y, Cui Y N, Zhang A F, et al. A simple simulation method for nakagami fading channel. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Chengdu, 2010. 160–163Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biscarini M, Marzano F S, Montopoli M, et al. Weather effects mitigation at Ka-band by using radiometeorological model forecast in deep space downlinks. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Lisbon, 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morabito D D. Solar coronar induced fluctuations on spacecraft signal amplitude observed during solar superior conjunctions of the Cassini spacecraft. Radio Science, 2016, 42: 1–16Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xue Y H, Chai Y, Liu N B, et al. Sky-wave OTHR ionospheric channel modeling. Chinese J Radio Sci, 2013, 28: 862–868Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morabito D D. Spectral broadening and phase scintillation measurements using interplanetary spacecraft radio links during the peak of solar cycle 23. Radio Sci, 2009, 44: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu T, Yan Y, Li Y C, et al. Deep space channel modeling and the analysis of wave propagation environment characteristics under solar scintillation. Chinese J Radio Sci, 2015, 30: 417–422Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morabito D D. Solar Corona Amplitude Scintillation Modelingand Comparison to Measurements at X-band and Kaband. PN Progress Report 42-153, 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morabito D D, Shambayati S, Butman S, et al. The 1998 Mars Global Surveyor Solar Corona Experiment. TMO Progress Report 42-142, 2000Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rao Q L. The link analyzation and design based on CCSDS for Mars probe TTC&C system. Dissertation for Master Degree. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu Z H. Ka band deep space communication channel modeling based on the exploration of Mars. Dissertation for Master Degree. Suzhou: Suzhou University, 2012Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morabito D D, Schratz B, Bruvold K, et al. The Mars Science Laboratory EDL Communications Brownout and Blackout at UHF. IPN Progress Report 42-197, 2014Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wood G E, Asmar S W, Rebold T A, et al. Mars Pathfinder Entry, Descent, and Landing Communications. TDA Progress Report 42-131, 1997Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Esatorius E, Estabrook P, Wilson J, et al. Direct-to-Earth Communications and Signal Processing for Mars Exploration Rover Entry, Descent and Landing. IPN Progress Report 42-153, 2003Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    He G L, Zhan Y F, Zhang J Z, et al. Characterization of the dynamic effects of the reentry plasma sheath on electromagnetic wave propagation. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci, 2016, 44: 232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang J Z, He G L, Bai P, et al. Characterization and performance evaluation of turbulent plasma sheath channel. China Commun, 2016, 13: 88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang J Z, He G L, Bai P, et al. Dynamic channel modeling for communication through turbulent plasma sheath. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing, Nanjing, 2015Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    He G L, Zhan Y F, Ge N, et al. Channel characterization and finite-state Markov channel modeling for time-varying plasma sheath surrounding hypersonic vehicles. Prog Electrom Res, 2014, 145: 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ma H J, Zhu X L. The latest progress of free space laser communications. Laser Optoelectron Prog, 2005, 42: 7–11Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wilson K E. Overview of the ground-to-orbit laser communication demonstration. Proc SPIE, 1997, 2990: 23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen C C. Overview of the optical communications demonstrator. Proc SPIE, 1994, 2123: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ma J, Tan L Y. The progress and trend of researches of intersatellite optical communications. Chinese J Space Sci, 2000, 20: 128–136Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim I I. Preliminary result of the STRV-2 satellite-to-ground lasercom experiment. Proc SPIE, 2000, 3932: 21–34MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ke S Y. The research of channel model in space laser communication. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2007Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boroson D M, Scozzafava J J, Murphy D V, et al. The lunar laser communications demonstration. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology (SMC-IT), Pasadena, 2009. 23–28Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu X, Kahn J. Performance bound for coded free-space optical communication through turbulence channel. IEEE Trans Commun, 2003, 51: 1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rao R Z, Wang S P. Experimental study of spot dancing of laser beam in a turbulent atmosphere. Chinese J Lasers, 2000, 27: 1011–1015Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lu Y, Lin Y S. The simple method to calculate the atmosphere transmittance of infrared radiation. Infrared Technol, 2003, 25: 45–49Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fan W, Wang Y, Rao R Z. Wavelength band selection method for taget detection based on character of atmosphere radiation. Infrared Laser Eng, 2005, 34: 177–182Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Climate Literacy Labs of Georgia State University. Lab 5: global surface temperature. 2014. http://sites.gsu.edu/ geog1112/global-surface-temperature/Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wu C J, Yan C X. Overview of space laser communication. Chinese J Opt, 2013, 6: 670–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaohan Pan
    • 1
  • Yafeng Zhan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peng Wan
    • 1
  • Jianhua Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Space CenterTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations