Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Coexistence of delay-sensitive MTC/HTC traffic in large scale networks

Abstract

The support for mission critical machine-type-communication (cMTC) services is indispensable for the 5th generation (5G) mobile communication systems. As the cMTC and (part of) the conventional human-type-communication (HTC) services are broadband and delay-sensitive services, how to ensure their coexistence is a new and challenging problem. This paper investigates the problem of service-level resource allocation, which decides how cMTC and HTC traffic share a limited amount of radio resource. Considering a large-scale network, we put forth a system model that integrates queuing models and stochastic geometric models to characterize the delay performance in self-interfering scenarios. A service-level resource allocation scheme called load division is proposed. The delay and throughput performance of cMTC and HTC are derived under different resource allocation schemes and priority scheduling policies. We show that compared with the baseline scheme of frequency division, the proposed load division scheme can significantly improve the delay performance of cMTC service, at a cost of slightly degraded MTC and HTC service capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1

    Agiwal M, Roy A, Saxena N. Next generation 5G wireless networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 2016, 18: 1617–1655

  2. 2

    Wang C X, Haider F, Gao X, et al. Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 2014, 52: 122–130

  3. 3

    Ge X H, Chen J Q, Wang C X, et al. 5G green cellular networks considering power allocation schemes. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 022308

  4. 4

    Patcharamaneepakorn P, Wu S, Wang C X, et al. Spectral, energy and economic efficiency of 5G multi-cell massive MIMO systems with generalized spatial modulation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2016, 65: 9715–9731

  5. 5

    Ge X H, Tu S, Mao G Q, et al. 5G ultra-dense cellular networks. IEEE Wirel Commun, 2016, 23: 72–79

  6. 6

    Ma X, Sheng M, Li J D, et al. Concurrent transmission for energy efficiency of user equipment in 5G wireless communication networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 022306

  7. 7

    Ma Z, Zhang Z Q, Ding Z G, et al. Key techniques for 5G wireless communications:network architecture, physical layer, and MAC layer perspectives. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 041301

  8. 8

    Cao J Y, Zhang Y, An W, et al. VNF-FG design and VNF placement for 5G mobile networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 040302

  9. 9

    Osseiran A, Boccardi F, Braun V, et al. Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project. IEEE Commun Mag, 2014, 52: 26–35

  10. 10

    Ratasuk R, Mangalvedhe N, Ghosh A. Overview of LTE enhancements for cellular IoT. In: Proceedings of IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Hong Kong, 2015. 2293–2297

  11. 11

    Raza U, Kulkarni P, Sooriyabandara M. Low power wide area networks: an overview. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 2017, 19: 855–873

  12. 12

    Gozalvez J. New 3GPP standard for IoT [mobile radio]. IEEE Veh Technol Mag, 2016, 11: 14–20

  13. 13

    Ashraf S A, Aktas I, Eriksson E, et al. Ultra-reliable and low-latency communication for wireless factory automation: from LTE to 5G. In: Proceedings of IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Berlin, 2016. 1–8

  14. 14

    Ratasuk R, Prasad A, Li Z, et al. Recent advancements in M2M communications in 4G networks and evolution towards 5G. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks, Paris, 2015. 52–57

  15. 15

    Shariatmadari H, Ratasuk R, Iraji S, et al. Machine-type communications: current status and future perspectives toward 5G systems. IEEE Commun Mag, 2015, 53: 10–17

  16. 16

    Hossain M I, Azari A, Zander J. DERA: augmented random access for cellular networks with dense H2H-MTC mixed traffic. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Washington, 2016. 1–7

  17. 17

    Aijaz A, Tshangini M, Nakhai M R, et al. Energy-efficient uplink resource allocation in LTE networks with M2M/H2H co-existence under statistical QoS guarantees. IEEE Trans Commun, 2014, 62: 2353–2365

  18. 18

    Niyato D, Wang P, Kim D I. Performance modeling and analysis of heterogeneous machine type communications. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2014, 13: 2836–2849

  19. 19

    Tian H, Xu Y Y, Xu K, et al. Energy-efficient user association in heterogeneous networks with M2M/H2H coexistence under QoS guarantees. China Commun, 2015, 12: 93–103

  20. 20

    Aijaz A, Aghvami A H. PRMA-based cognitive machine-to-machine communications in smart grid networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2015, 64: 3608–3623

  21. 21

    Hamdoun S, Rachedi A, Ghamri-Doudane Y. Radio resource sharing forMTC in LTE-A: an interference-aware bipartite graph approach. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), San Diego, 2015. 1–7

  22. 22

    Hamdoun S, Rachedi A, Ghamri-Doudane Y. A flexible M2M radio resource sharing scheme in LTE networks within an H2H/M2M coexistence scenario. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, 2016. 1–7

  23. 23

    Azari A, Miao G. Battery lifetime-aware base station sleeping control with M2M/H2H coexistence. In: Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Washington, 2016. 1–6

  24. 24

    Tian H, Xie W, Gan X Y, et al. Hybrid user association for maximising energy efficiency in heterogeneous networks with human-to-human/machine-to-machine coexistence. IET Commun, 2016, 10: 1035–1043

  25. 25

    Lien S Y, Cheng S M, Shih S Y, et al. Radio resource management for QoS guarantees in cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans Parall Distr Syst, 2012, 23: 1752–1761

  26. 26

    Tian H, Xu L L, Pei Y S, et al. Power ramping schemes for M2M and H2H co-existing scenario. China Commun, 2013, 10: 100–113

  27. 27

    Zheng K, Ou S, Alonso-Zarate J. Challenges of massive access in highly dense LTE-advanced networks with machine- to-machine communications. IEEE Wirel Commun, 2014, 21: 12–18

  28. 28

    Ali M S, Hossain E, Kim D I. LTE/LTE-A random access for massive machine-type communications in smart cities. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 76–83

  29. 29

    3GPP TR 45.820. Cellular system support for ultra low complexity and low throughput Internet of Things. http:// www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/45series/45.820/45820-d10.zip

  30. 30

    Ericsson and Nokia Networks. Further LTE physical layer enhancements for MTC. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsgran/ tsgran/TSGR65/Docs/RP-141660.zip

  31. 31

    Lauridsen M, Kovacs I Z, Mogensen P. Coverage and capacity analysis of LTE-M and NB-IoT in a rural area. In: Proceedings of IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), Montreal, 2016. 1–5

  32. 32

    Wang Y P E, Lin X, Adhikary A. A primer on 3GPP narrowband Internet of Things. IEEE Commun Mag, 2017, 55: 117–123

  33. 33

    Ratasuk R, Vejlgaard B, Mangalvedhe N. NB-IoT system for M2M communication. In: Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Doha, 2016. 1–5

  34. 34

    Ratasuk R, Mangalvedhe N, Zhang Y. Overview of narrowband IoT in LTE Rel-13. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN), Berlin, 2016. 1–7

  35. 35

    Yu C S, Yu L, Wu Y. Uplink scheduling and link adaptation for narrowband Internet of Things systems. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 1724–1734

  36. 36

    Stuckmann P. The GSM Evolution: Mobile Packet Data Services. Chichester: Wiley, 2002

  37. 37

    Erik D, Stefan P, Johan S. 4G - LTE/LTE-advanced for mobile broadband. Burlington: Elsevie, 2011

  38. 38

    Shariatmadari H, Iraji S, Jantti R. Analysis of transmission methods for ultra-reliable communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Hong Kong, 2015. 2303–2308

  39. 39

    Udesh O, Furqan A, Olav T. Ultra-reliable link adaptation for downlink MISO transmission in 5G cellular networks. Information, 2016, 7: 14

  40. 40

    Yilmaz O N C, Wang Y P E, Johansson N A. Analysis of ultra-reliable and low-latency 5G communication for a factory automation use case. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London, 2015. 1190–1195

  41. 41

    Johansson N A, Wang N A, Eriksson E. Radio access for ultra-reliable and low-latency 5G communications. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London, 2015. 1184–1189

  42. 42

    Durisi G, Koch T, Ostman J. Short-packet communications over multiple-antenna Rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Trans Commun, 2016, 64: 618–629

  43. 43

    Durisi G, Koch T, Popovski P. Toward massive, ultrareliable, and low-latency wireless communication with short packets. Proc IEEE, 2016, 104: 1711–1726

  44. 44

    Farayev B, Ergen S C. Towards ultra-reliable M2M communication: scheduling policies in fading channels. In: Pro-ceedings of 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT), Thessaloniki, 2016. 1–6

  45. 45

    Singh B, Li Z, Tirkkonen O. Ultra-reliable communication in a factory environment for 5G wireless networks: link level and deployment study. In: Proceedings of IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Valencia, 2016. 1–5

  46. 46

    Hou I-H, Borkar V, Kumar P R. A theory of QoS for wireless. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE INFOCOM, Rio de Janeiro, 2009. 486–494

  47. 47

    Lashgari S, Avestimehr A S. Timely throughput of heterogeneous wireless networks: fundamental limits and algorithms. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2013, 59: 8414–8433

  48. 48

    Zhang G Z, Quek T Q S, Huang A P, et al. Delay and reliability tradeoffs in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2016, 15: 1101–1113

  49. 49

    Yu SM, Kim S L. Downlink capacity and base station density in cellular networks. In: Proceedings of 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), Tsukuba Science City, 2013. 119–124

  50. 50

    Andrews J G, Baccelli F, Ganti R K. A tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networks. IEEE Trans Commun, 2011, 59: 3122–3134

  51. 51

    Kleinrock L. Queueing Systems Volume II: Computer Applications. New York: Wiley, 1976

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61571378), EU H2020 RISE TESTBED Project (Grant No. 734325), EU FP7 QUICK Project (Grant No. PIRSES-GA-2013-612652), and EPSRC TOUCAN Project (Grant No. EP/L020009/1).

Author information

Correspondence to Xuemin Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, J., Liu, C., Hong, X. et al. Coexistence of delay-sensitive MTC/HTC traffic in large scale networks. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60, 100302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-017-9183-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • machine type communication
  • coexistence
  • resource allocation
  • priority queue
  • delay sensitive