Non-fragility of multi-agent controllability

Research Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Controllability of multi-agent systems is determined by the interconnection topologies. In practice, losing agents can change the topologies of multi-agent systems, which may affect the controllability. In order to preserve controllability, this paper first introduces the concept of non-fragility of controllability. In virtue of the notion of cutsets, necessary and sufficient conditions are established from a graphic perspective, for almost surely strongly/weakly preserving controllability, respectively. Then, the problem of leader selection to preserve controllability is proposed. The tight bounds of the fewest leaders to achieve strongly preserving controllability are estimated in terms of the diameter of the interconnection topology, and the cardinality of the node set. Correspondingly, the tight bounds of the fewest leaders to achieve weakly preserving controllability are estimated in terms of the cutsets of the interconnection topology. Furthermore, two algorithms are established for selecting the fewest leaders to strongly/weakly preserve the controllability. In addition, the algorithm for leaders’ locations to maximize non-fragility is also designed. Simulation examples are provided to illuminate the theoretical results and exhibits how the algorithms proceed.

Keywords

non-fragility controllability preserving cutset leader selection almost surely 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61375120, 61603288).

References

  1. 1.
    Xiao F, Wang L, Chen J. Partial state consensus for networks of second-order dynamic agents. Syst Control Lett, 2010, 59: 775–781MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang L, Xiao F. Finite-time consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2010, 55: 950–955MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Z, Zhang L, Hao F, et al. Leader-following consensus for linear and lipschitz nonlinear multiagent systems with quantized communication. IEEE Trans Cyber, 2016, 47: 1970–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jing G, Zheng Y, Wang L. Consensus of multiagent systems with distance-dependent communication networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2017, 28: 2712–2726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao F, Wang L, Chen J, et al. Finite-time formation control for multi-agent systems. Automatica, 2009, 45: 2605–2611MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olfati-Saber R. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2006, 51: 401–420MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jing G, Zheng Y, Wang L. Flocking of multi-agent systems with multiple groups. Int J Control, 2014, 87: 2573–2582MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guan Y, Ji Z, Zhang L, et al. Decentralized stabilizability of multi-agent systems under fixed and switching topologies. Syst Control Lett, 2013, 62: 438–446MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guan Y, Ji Z, Zhang L, et al. Controllability of heterogeneous multi-agent systems under directed and weighted topology. Int J Control, 2016, 89: 1009–1024MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guan Y Q, Wang L. Structural controllability of multi-agent systems with absolute protocol under fixed and switching topologies. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 092203MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guan Y Q, Ji Z, Zhang L, et al. Controllability of multi-agent systems under directed topology. Int J Robust Nonlin Control, 2017. doi: 10.1002/rnc.3798Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lu Z, Zhang L, Ji Z, et al. Controllability of discrete-time multi-agent systems with directed topology and input delay. Int J Control, 2016, 89: 179–192MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ma J, Zheng Y, Wu B, et al. Equilibrium topology of multi-agent systems with two leaders: a zero-sum game perspective. Automatica, 2016, 73: 200–206MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tanner H. On the controllability of nearest neighbor interconnections. In: Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Nassau, 2004. 2467–2472Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang L, Jiang F C, Xie G M,et al. Controllability of multi-agent systems based on agreement protocols. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 2074–2088MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao B, Guan Y, Wang L. Controllability improvement for multi-agent systems: leader selection and weight adjustment. Int J Control, 2016, 89: 2008–2018MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ji Z, Lin H, Yu H. Protocols design and uncontrollable topologies construction for multi-agent networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2015, 60: 781–786MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rahmani A, Ji M, Mesbahi M, et al. Controllability of multi-agent systems from a graph-theoretic perspective. SIAM J Control Optim, 2009, 48: 162–186MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji Z, Lin H, Yu H. Leaders in multi-agent controllability under consensus algorithm and tree topology. Syst Control Lett, 2012, 61: 918–925MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parlangeli G, Notarstefano G. On the reachability and observability of path and cycle graphs. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2012, 57: 743–748MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Notarstefano G, Parlangeli G. Controllability and observability of grid graphs via reduction and symmetries. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2013, 58: 1719–1731MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Partovi A, Lin H, Ji Z. Structural controllability of high order dynamic multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics Automation and Mechatronics, Singapore, 2010. 327–332Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zamani M, Lin H. Structural controllability of multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 American Control Conference, St. Louis, 2009. 5743–5748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lou Y, Hong Y. Controllability analysis of multi-agent systems with directed and weighted interconnection. Int J Control, 2012, 85: 1486–1496MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldin D, Raisch J. On the weight controllability of consensus algorithms. In: Proceedings of European Control Conference, Zurich, 2013. 233–238Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jafari S, Ajorlou A, Aghdam A G. Leader selection in multi-agent systems subject to partial failure. In: Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference, San Francisco, 2011. 5330–5335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahimian M A, Aghdam A G. Structural controllability of multiagent networks: robustness against simultaneous failures. Automatica, 2013, 49: 3149–3157MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson R J. Introduction to Graph Theory. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mayeda H, Yamada T. Strong structural controllability. SIAM J Control Opt, 1979, 17: 123–128MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Systems and Control, College of EngineeringPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Complex Systems, School of Mechano-Electronic EngineeringXidian UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations