By using the distributed consensus theory in multi-agent systems, the strategy of economic power dispatch is studied in a smart grid, where many generation units work cooperatively to achieve an optimal solution in a local area. The relationship between the distributed optimization solution and consensus in multi-agent systems is first revealed in this paper, which can serve as a general framework for future studies of this topic. First, without the constraints of capacity limitations, it is found that the total cost for all the generators in a smart grid can achieve the minimal value if the consensus can be reached for the incremental cost of all the generation units and the balance between the supply and demand of powers is kept. Then, by designing a distributed consensus control protocol in multi-agent systems with appropriate initial conditions, incremental cost consensus can be realized and the balance for the powers can also be satisfied. Furthermore, the difficult problem for distributed optimization of the total cost function with bounded capacity limitations is also discussed. A reformulated barrier function is proposed to simplify the analysis, under which the total cost can reach the minimal value if consensus can be achieved for the modified incremental cost with some appropriate initial values. Thus, the distributed optimization problems for the cost function of all generation units with and without bounded capacity limitations can both be solved by using the idea of consensus in multi-agent systems, whose theoretical analysis is still lacking nowadays. Finally, some simulation examples are given to verify the effectiveness of the results in this paper.
power dispatch strategy consensus incremental cost capacity limitations distributed protocol multi-agent systems
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0800401), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61673107, 61673104, 61621003, 61532020), National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-notch Talents, Cheung Kong Scholars Programme of China for Young Scholars, Six Talent Peaks of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. 2014-DZXX-004), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. 2242016K41058).
Ahn S J, Nam S R, Choi J H, et al. Power scheduling of distributed generators for economic and stable operation of a microgrid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 2013, 4: 398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakirtzis A, Petridis V, Kazarlis S. Genetic algorithm solution to the economic dispatch problem. Proc Gener Trans Distrib, 1994, 141: 377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attaviriyanupap P, Kita H, Tanaka E, et al. A hybrid EP and SQP for dynamic economic dispatch with nonsmooth fuel cost function. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2002, 17: 411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaing Z L. Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2003, 18: 1187–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park J, Lee K, Shin J, et al. A particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch with nonsmooth cost functions. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2005, 20: 34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu X, Cecati C, Dillon T, et al. The new frontier of smart grids: an industrial electronics perspective. IEEE Ind Electron Mag, 2011, 5: 49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu W W, Wen G H, Yu X H, et al. Bridging the gap between complex networks and smart grids. J Control Decis, 2014, 1: 102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao Y, Yu W, Ren W, et al. An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2013, 9: 427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu W, Chen G, Cao M, et al. Second-order consensus for multi-agent systems with directed topologies and nonlinear dynamics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 2010, 40: 881–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu W, Zhou L, Yu X, et al. Consensus in multi-agent systems with second-order dynamics and sampled data. IEEE Trans Ind Inf, 2013, 9: 2137–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedić A, Ozdaglar A. Distributed subgradient methods for multiagent optimization. IEEE Trans Auto Control, 2009, 54: 48–61CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Yuan D, Ho D W C, Xu S. Regularized primal-dual subgradient method for distributed constrained optimization. IEEE Trans Cybern, 2016, 46: 2109–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu Q, Wang J. L1-minimization algorithms for sparse signal reconstruction based on a projection neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 2016, 27: 698–707MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Z, Ying X C, Chow M Y. Decentralizing the economic dispatch problem using a two-level incremental cost consensus algorithm in a smart grid environment. In: Proceedings of North American Power Symposium, Boston, 2011. 1–7Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Chow M Y. Convergence analysis of the incremental cost consensus algorithm under different communication network topologies in a smart grid. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2012, 27: 1761–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang Z, Chow M Y. The Influence of Time Delays on Decentralized Economic Dispatch by Using Incremental Cost Consensus Algorithm. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 313–326Google Scholar
Dominguez-Garcia A D, Cady S T, Hadjicostis C N. Decentralized optimal dispatch of distributed energy resources. In: Proceedings of IEEE 51st Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Maui Hawaii, 2012. 3688–3693Google Scholar
Kar S, Hug G. Distributed robust economic dispatch in power systems: a consensus+innovation approach. Power Energy Soc Gen Meet, 2012Google Scholar
Yang S, Tan S, Xu J. Consensus based approach for economic dispatch problem in a smart grid. IEEE Trans Power Syst, 2013, 28: 4416–4426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherukuri A, Cortes J. Distributed generator coordination for initialization and anytime optimization in economic dispatch. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst, 2015, 2: 226–237MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar