Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Ordered proposition fusion based on consistency and uncertainty measurements


The fusion of ordered propositions is an important and widespread problem in artificial intelligence, but existing fusion methods have difficulty handling the fusion of ordered propositions. In this paper, we propose a solution based on consistency and uncertainty measurements. The main contributions of this paper are as follows. First, we propose the concept of convexity degree, mean, and center of basic support function to comprehensively describe the basic support function of ordered propositions. Second, we introduce entropy as a measure of uncertainty in the basic support function of ordered propositions. Third, we generalize the indeterminacy of the basic support function and propose a novel method to measure the consistency between two basic support functions. Finally, based on the above researches, we propose a novel algorithm for fusing ordered propositions. Theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1

    Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann Math Stat, 1967, 38: 325–339

  2. 2

    Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976

  3. 3

    Wang H, Liu J, Augusto J C. Mass function derivation and combination in multivariate data spaces. Inform Sci, 2010, 180: 813–819

  4. 4

    Murphy C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis Support Syst, 2000, 29: 1–9

  5. 5

    Han D Q, Han C Z, Deng Y, et al. Weighted combination of conflicting evidence based on evidence variance. Acta Electro Sin, 2011, 39: 153–157

  6. 6

    Song Y F, Wang X D, Lei L, et al. Evidence combination based on the degree of credibility and falsity. J Commun, 2015, 36: 2015104

  7. 7

    Yang Y, Han D Q, Han C Z. Evidence combination based on multi-criteria rank-level fusion. Acta Autom Sin, 2012, 38: 823–831

  8. 8

    Florea M C, Jousselme A L, Bosse E, et al. Robust combination rules for evidence theory. Inform Fusion, 2009, 10: 183–197

  9. 9

    Smarandache F, Dezert J. Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules for Information Fusion, Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion (Collected works). Rehoboth: American Research Press, 2006

  10. 10

    Fu Y W, Yang W. Combination rule based on proportional redistribution of generalized conflict for evidence theory. Chin J Electron, 2014, 23: 533–538

  11. 11

    Liu W. Analyzing the degree of conflict among basic support functions. Artif Intell, 2006, 170: 909–924

  12. 12

    Yang Y, Liu D Y, Wu L Z, et al. An important extension of an evidence theory based on inexact reasoning model. J Comput, 1990, 13: 772–778

  13. 13

    Liu D Y, Ouyang J H, Tang H Y, et al. Research on a simplified evidence theory model. J Comput Res Dev, 1999, 36: 134–138

  14. 14

    Liu D Y, Yang K, Tang H Y. A convex evidence theory model. J Comput Res Dev, 2000, 37: 175–181

  15. 15

    Liu D Y. Numerical Methods for Uncertainty and Vagueness in Knowledge Systems. Changchun: Jilin University Press, 2000

  16. 16

    Guan J W, Xu Y. Model expert system MES. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 85), Los Angeles, 1985. 397–399

  17. 17

    Dai J H, Wang W T, Xu Q, et al. Uncertainty measurement for interval-valued decision systems based on extended conditional entropy. Knowl-Based Syst, 2012, 27: 443–450

  18. 18

    Wang G Y, Ma X, Yu H. Monotonic uncertainty measures for attribute reduction in probabilistic rough set model. Int J Approx Reason, 2015, 59: 41–67

  19. 19

    Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J, 1948, 27: 379–423

  20. 20

    Liu C, Grenier D, Jousselme A L, et al. Reducing algorithm complexity for computing an aggregate uncertainty measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A, 2007, 37: 669–679

  21. 21

    Huynh V N, Yoshiteru N. Notes on reducing algorithm complexity for computing an aggregate uncertainty measure. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A, 2010, 40: 205–209

  22. 22

    Jousselme A L, Liu C S, Grenier D, et al. Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A, 2006, 36: 890–903

  23. 23

    Klir G J, Lewis H W. Remarks on measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A, 2008, 38: 995–999

  24. 24

    Smarandache F, Martin A, Osswald C. Contradiction measures and specificity degrees of basic belief assignments. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Fusion, Chicago, 2011. 1–8

Download references


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61133011, 61502198, 61572226, 61472161, 61373053), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013M541303), Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province of China (Grant No. 20150520066-JH), and State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics. The authors would like to appreciate the handling editor and the anonymous reviewers, whose constructive and insightful comments greatly helped in improving this paper.

Author information

Correspondence to Yungang Zhu.

Additional information

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, D., Zhu, Y., Ni, N. et al. Ordered proposition fusion based on consistency and uncertainty measurements. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60, 082103 (2017).

Download citation


  • uncertainty processing
  • ordered proposition
  • evidence theory
  • dempster rule of combination
  • information fusion