Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Quasi-consistent fusion navigation algorithm for DSS

  • 72 Accesses

  • 3 Citations


A fusion navigation algorithm for the distributed satellites system (DSS) utilizing relative range measurements is proposed in this paper. Based on the quasi-consistent extended Kalman filter (QCEKF), an on-line evaluation of the navigation precision can be provided by the fusion navigation algorithm. In addition, the upper bound for the estimation error obtained from the fusion navigation algorithm is lower than those with any groups of measurements, which indicates that the fusion navigation algorithm can automatically choose the suitable redundant measurements to improve the navigation precision. The simulations show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed fusion navigation algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1

    Schetter T, Campbell M, Surka D. Multiple agent-based autonomy for satellite constellations. Artif Intell, 2003, 145: 147–180

  2. 2

    Ley W, Wittmann K, Hallmann W. Handbuch der Raumfahrttechnik. Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & CO. KG, 2011

  3. 3

    Tapley B D, Ries J C, Davis G W, et al. Precision orbit determination for TOPEX/POSEIDON. J Geophys Res, 1994, 99: 24383–24404

  4. 4

    Psiaki M L. Autonomous orbit determination for two spacecraft from relative position measurements. J Guid Control Dynam, 1999, 22: 305–312

  5. 5

    Yim J R, Crassidis J L, Junkins J L. Autonomous orbit navigation of two spacecraft system using relative line of sight vector measurements. AAS Paper 04–257, 2004

  6. 6

    Markley F L. Autonomous navigation using landmark and intersatellite data. AIAA Paper 84–1987, 1984

  7. 7

    Liu Y, Liu L. Orbit determination using satellite-to-satellite tracking data. Chin J Astron Astrophys, 2001, 1: 281–286

  8. 8

    Grechkoseev A K. Study of observability of motion of an orbital group of navigation space system using intersatellite range measurements. I. J Comput Sys Sci Int, 2011, 50: 293–308

  9. 9

    Grechkoseev A K. Study of observability of motion of an orbital group of navigation space system using intersatellite range measurements. II. J Comput Syst Sci Int, 2011, 50: 472–482

  10. 10

    Hill K, Born G H. Autonomous interplanetary orbit determination using satellite-to-satellite tracking. J Guid Control Dynam, 2007, 30: 679–686

  11. 11

    Hill K, Born G H. Autonomous orbit determination from lunar halo orbits using crosslink range. J Spacecraft Rockets, 2008, 45: 548–553

  12. 12

    Huxel P J, Bishop R H. Navigation algorithms and observability analysis for formation flying missions. J Guid Control Dynam, 2009, 32: 1218–1231

  13. 13

    Huxel P J. Navigation algorithms and observability analysis for formation flying missions. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Austin: University of Texas, 2006

  14. 14

    Shorshi G, Bar-Itzhack I Y. Satellite autonomous navigation and orbit determination using magnetometers. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Decision and Control, Tucson, 1992. 542–548

  15. 15

    Wiegand M. Autonomous satellite navigation via Kalman filter of magnetometer data. Acta Astronaut, 1996, 38: 395–403

  16. 16

    Li Y, Xu X S. The application of EKF and UKF to the SINS/GPS integrated navigation systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science (ICIECS), Wuhan, 2010. 1–5

  17. 17

    Xia H W, Diao Y H, Ma G C, et al. X-ray pulsar relative navigation approach based on extended Kalman filter. J Chin Inertial Tech, 2014, 22: 619–623

  18. 18

    Jiang Y G, Xue W C, Huang Y, et al. The consistent extended Kalman filter. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference, Nanjing, 2014. 6838–6845

  19. 19

    Chong C Y. Hierarchical estimation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd MIT/ONR Workshop on C3, Monterey, 1979. 205–220

  20. 20

    Chong C Y, Chang K C, Mori S. Distributed tracking in distributed sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the American Contrlol Conference, Seattle, 1986

  21. 21

    Chang K C, Zhi T, Saha R K. Performance evaluation of track fusion with information matrix filter. IEEE Trans Aero Elec Syst, 2002, 38: 455–466

  22. 22

    Roy A E. Orbital Motion. 4th ed. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2005

  23. 23

    Bar-Shalom Y, Li X R, Kirubarajan T. Estimation with Application to Tracking and Navigation. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001

  24. 24

    Julier S J, Uhlmann J K. A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE 3068, Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition VI, Orlando, 1997. 182–193

  25. 25

    Jiang Y G. On quasi-consistent nonlinear Kalman filter. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016

  26. 26

    Sabol C, Burns R, McLaughlin C A. Satellite formation flying design and evolution. J Spacecraft Rockets, 2001, 38: 270–278

  27. 27

    Simon D. Optimal State Estimation — Kalman, H , and Nonlinear Approaches. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2006

Download references


This work was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2014CB845303) and National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Correspondence to Qiya Su.

Additional information

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Q., Huang, Y., Jiang, Y. et al. Quasi-consistent fusion navigation algorithm for DSS. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 61, 012201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-9054-x

Download citation


  • quasi-consistent extended Kalman filter (QCEKF)
  • extended Kalman filter (EKF)
  • fusion algorithm
  • navigation
  • distributed satellites system (DSS)