Partial intersection sphere decoding with weighted voting for sparse rotated V-OFDM systems

Research Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Vector orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (V-OFDM) is a general system that builds a bridge between OFDM and single-carrier frequency domain equalization in terms of intersymbol interference level and receiver complexity. In this paper, we focus on a rotated V-OFDM system over a broadband sparse channel owing to its large time delay spread and fewer nonzero taps. In order to collect the multipath diversity, a simple rotation matrix is designed, independent of the number of subchannels at the transmitter. For the rotated V-OFDM receiver, a partial intersection sphere decoding with weighted voting method is proposed by exploiting the sparse nature of the multipath channel. The proposed receiver chooses the transmitted vector from the set with the maximum likelihood estimation generated using the partial intersection sphere decoding method. For an extreme case, such as when a candidate set is empty, which usually occurs at a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), an efficient weighted voting system is used to estimate the transmitted vectors symbol-by-symbol. Simulation results indicate that the proposed receiver improves the symbol error rate performance with reduced complexity, especially for low SNR scenarios.

Keywords

vector orthogonal frequency division multiplexing sparse multipath channel partial intersection sphere decoding weighted voting diversity order 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61401194), China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201406190083), and Program B for Outstanding Ph.D. Candidate of Nanjing University (Grant No. 201501B013).

References

  1. 1.
    Cimini L J. Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing. IEEE Trans Commun, 1985, 33: 665–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astély D, Dahlman E, Furusk¨ar A, et al. LTE: the evolution of mobile broadband. IEEE Commun Mag, 2009, 47: 44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang T, Yang C, Wu G, et al. OFDM and its wireless applications: a survey. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2009, 58: 1673–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daoud O. Performance improvement of wavelet packet transform over fast Fourier transform in multiple-input multipleoutput orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems. IET Commun, 2012, 6: 765–773MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang T X, Xia X-G, Kong L J. CP-based MIMO OFDM radar IRCI free range reconstruction using real orthogonal designs. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60: 022301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang N, Blostein S D. Comparison of CP-based single carrier and OFDM with power allocation. IEEE Trans Commun, 2005, 53: 391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tajer A, Nosratinia A. Diversity order in ISI channels with single-carrier frequency-domain equalizers. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2010, 9: 1022–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Souto N, Dinis R, Silva J C. Impact of channel estimation errors on SC-FDE systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2014, 62: 1530–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falconer D, Ariyavisitakul S L, Benyamin-Seeyar A, et al. Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems. IEEE Commun Mag, 2002, 40: 58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pancaldi F, Vitetta G, Kalbasi R, et al. Single-carrier frequency-domain equalization. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 2008, 25: 37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xia X-G. Precoded and vector OFDM robust to channel spectral nulls and with reduced cyclic prefix length in single transmit antenna systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2001, 25: 1363–1374MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang H, Xia X-G, Zhang Q, et al. Precoded OFDM with adaptive vector channel allocation for scalable video transmission over frequency selective fading channels. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput, 2002, 1: 132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang H, Xia X-G, Cimini L J, et al. Synchronization techniques and guard-band-configuration scheme for singleantenna vector-OFDM systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 2005, 4: 2454–2464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang H, Xia X-G. Iterative decoding and demodulation for single-antenna vector OFDM systems. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2005, 55: 1447–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou W, Fan L, Chen H. Vector orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system over fast fading channels. IET Commun, 2014, 8: 2322–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ngebani I, Li Y, Xia X-G, et al. Analysis and compensation of phase noise in vector OFDM systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2014, 62: 6143–6157MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ngebani I, Li Y, Xia X-G. EM-based phase noise estimation in vector OFDM systems using linear MMSE receivers. IEEE Trans Veh Tech, 2016, 65: 110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Han C, Hashimoto T, Suehiro N. Constellation-rotated vector OFDM and its performance analysis over Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans Commun, 2010, 58: 828–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han C, Hashimoto T. Tight PEP lower bound for constellation-rotated vector-OFDM under carrier frequency offset and fast fading. IEEE Trans Commun, 2014, 62: 1931–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheng P, Tao M, Xiao Y, et al. V-OFDM: on performance limits over multi-path Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Trans Commun, 2011, 59: 1878–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li Y, Ngebani I, Xia X-G. On performance of vector OFDM with linear receivers. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2012, 60: 5268–5280MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kannu A P, Schniter P. On communication over unknown sparse frequency-selective block-fading channels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2011, 57: 6619–6632MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salous S, Degli Esposti V, Fuschini F, et al. Millimeter-wave propagation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2016, 58: 115–127Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang G, Liao H, Wang H. Systematic and optimal cyclotomic lattices and diagonal space-time block code designs. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2004, 50: 3348–3360MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agrell E, Eriksson A, Vardy A, et al. Closest point search in lattices. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2002, 48: 2201–2214MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Studer C, Burg A, B¨olcskei. Soft-output sphere decoding: algorithms and VLSI implementation. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun, 2008, 26: 290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hassibi B, Vikalo H. On the sphere decoding algorithm I. Expected complexity. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2005, 53: 2806–2818MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vikalo H, Hassibi B. On the sphere decoding algorithm II. Generalizations, second-order statistics, and applications to communications. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2005, 53: 2819–2834MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jaldén J, Ottersten B. On the complexity of sphere decoding in digital communications. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2005, 53: 1474–1484MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Seethaler D, Jaldén J, Studer C, et al. On the complexity distribution of sphere decoding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 2011, 57: 5754–5768MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic Science and EngineeringNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Information EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  4. 4.School of Electronics and Information EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations