Intelligent CPS: features and challenges

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1

    Rajkumar R R, Lee I, Sha L, et al. Cyber-physical systems: the next computing revolution. In: Proceedings of the 47th Design Automation Conference. New York: ACM, 2010. 731–736

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rawat D B, Rodrigues J J, Stojmenovic I. Cyber-Physical Systems: From Theory to Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Zhou, X S, Yang Y L, Yang G. Modeling methods for dynamic behaviors of cyber-physical system. Chinese J Comput, 2014; 37: 1411–1423

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Morgan J, O’Donell G E. A service-oriented reconfigurable process monitoring system-enabling cyber physical systems. J Mach Eng, 2014; 14: 116–129

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wang L, T¨orngren M, Onori M. Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst, 2015; 37: 517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Tariq M U, Grijalva S, Wolf M. A service-oriented, cyber-physical reference model for smart grid. In: Cyber Physical Systems Approach to Smart Electric Power Grid. Berlin: Springer, 2015. 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ahmad A, Paul A, Rathore M M, et al. Smart cyber society: integration of capillary devices with high usability based on cyber-physical dystem. Future Gener Comput Syst, 2015; 56: 493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Chen Y X. Stec: a location-triggered specification language for real-time systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Object/Component/Service-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing Workshops (ISORCW), Shenzhen, 2012. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Wu H Y, Chen Y X, Zhang M. On denotational semantics of spatial-temporal consistency language–STeC. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE), Birmingham, 2013. 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Rajhans A, Bhave A, Ruchkin I, et al. Supporting heterogeneity in cyber-physical systems architectures. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 2014; 59: 3178–3193

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Leitão P, Vrba P, Strasser T. Multi-agent systems as automation platform for intelligent energy systems. In: Proceedings of IECON 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Vienna, 2013. 66–71

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ni Z, Kobetski A, Axelsson J. Design and Implementation of a Dynamic Component Model for Federated AUTOSAR Systems. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Design Automation Conference. New York: ACM, 2014. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Ramos C, Vale Z, Faria L. Cyber-physical intelligence in the context of power systems. In: Future Generation Information Technology. Berlin: Springer, 2011. 19–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, G., Zhou, X. Intelligent CPS: features and challenges. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 59, 050102 (2016).

Download citation


  • Smart Grid
  • Smart City
  • Intelligent Manufacturing
  • IEEE Trans Automat Contr
  • IEEE Industrial Electronics Society