Science China Information Sciences

, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Routing for predictable Multi-Layered Satellite Networks

Research Paper Special Focus
  • 217 Downloads

Abstract

Multi-Layered Satellite Network (MLSN), especially LEO/MEO satellite network, consisting of low and medium earth orbit satellites, is capable of providing higher coverage and better service than single-layered one. Its performance in deployment, however, is mainly encumbered by obsolete routing protocols and algorithms. This paper takes the predictability of satellite movements into consideration, based on which a novel routing protocol Predictable Satellite Network Routing Protocol (PSNRP)—is proposed. In this protocol, every topology change due to satellite movement is either described as a predictable or an unpredictable change. On the basis of PSNRP, we import a heuristic routing algorithm for satisfying Quality-of-Service (QoS) requirements from network users, which is convinced as a Non-deterministic Polynomial Complete problem. The QoS requirements in this paper mainly refer to end-to-end delay, bandwidth and package loss rate. In addition to obtaining better routing performance, PSNRP successfully allocates calculation tasks evenly among all nodes, separates user data from protocol control data and achieves stronger robustness against satellite failures and link congestions. The superiority of our routing scheme is proved by simulation results.

Keywords

Multi-Layered Satellite Nework LEO/MEO routing predictable heuristic Quality-of-Service robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Elbert B R. The satellite communication application handbook. Norwood: Artech House, 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang J F, Lei L, Zhou M T. Topological dynamics characterization for LEO satellite networks. Comput Networks, 2007, 51: 43–53CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang H S, Kim B W, Lee C G, et al. FSA-based link assignment and routing in low-earth orbi satellite networks. IEEE T Vehicular Technol, 1998, 47: 1037–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Werner M, Delucchi C, Vegel H J, et al. ATM-based routing in LEO/MEO satellite networks with intersatellite links. IEEE J Selected Areas Commun, 1997, 15: 69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gounder V V, Prakash R Abu-Amara H. Routing in LEO-based satellite networks. In: Proceedings of Wireless Commun Syst, 1999 IEEE Emerging Technologies Symposium, 1999. 22.1–22.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashimoto Y, Sarikaya B. Design of IP-based Routing in a LEO Satellite Network. In: Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Satellite-Based Information Services, Dallas, 1998. 81–88Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekici E, Akyildiz I F, Bender M D. Datagram routing algorithmfor LEO satellite networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2000), IEEE, 2000. 2: 500–508Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhou Y H, Sun F C, Zhang B. A novel QoS routing protocol for LEO and MEO satellite networks. Int J Satellite Commun Networking, 2007, 25: 603–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reeves C R. Modern heuristic techniques for combitiorial problems. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Long F. Research on Satellite Network Robust QoS-aware Routing. Dissertation for Ph.D. Degree, Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer D, Basin D, Engel T. Topology Dynamics and Routing for Predictable Mobile Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, IEEE, 2008. 207–217Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akyildiz I F, Ekici E, Bender M D. MLSR: a novel routing algorithm for multilayered satellite IP networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking, 2002, 10: 411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen C, Ekici E. A Routing Protocol for hierarchical LEO/MEO satellite IP networks. Wireless Networks, 2005, 11: 507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu Y, Sun F C, Zhao Y J. Virtual topology for LEO satellite networks based on earth-fixed footprint mode. IEEE Commun Lett, 2013, 17: 357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu Y, Zhao Y J, Sun F C, et al. Dynamic fault-tolerant routing based on FSA for LEO satellite networks. IEEE Trans Comput, 2013, 62: 1495–1958Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    North J, Hoskin M. The Fontana history of astronomy and cosmology. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 1995, 26: 83Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Long F, Xiong N X, Vasilakos A V, et al. A sustainable heuristic QoS routing algorithm for pervasive multi-layered satellite wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 2010, 16: 1657–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moy J. OSPF protocol analysis. RFC 1245, 1991Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atmel Cooperation. TSC695F SPARC 32-bit Space Processor: User Manual, 2003Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glover F. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput Operations Res, 1986, 13: 533–549MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karaboga D, Gorkemli B, Ozturk C, et al. A comprehensive survey: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artif Intell Rev, 2012: 1–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Intelligence Technology and Systems, Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations