Skip to main content
Log in

Towards context consistency by concurrent checking for Internetware applications

  • Research Paper
  • Special Focus
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internetware applications are emerging and being widely used. They can adapt their behavior based on environmental contexts and deliver smart services. These contexts can be subject to various noises, which cause them to be inaccurate, incomplete, or even to conflict with each other. This is known as context inconsistency problem. Context inconsistency can trigger unexpected behavior to applications, and therefore should be prevented. One promising approach is to check contexts against consistency constraints so as to detect the occurrences of context inconsistency at runtime. Existing techniques have attempted different ways to improve the checking efficiency or effectiveness with different trade-offs in space overhead or communication cost. However, none of them has exploited multi-core computing capability to systematically improve the checking efficiency. In this paper, we propose a novel concurrent checking technique Con-C to efficiently detect inconsistencies in huge volumes of dynamic contexts. Con-C derives checking subtasks for each consistency constraint based on its structure and semantics. It achieves this in a fully automated way, and at the same time can guarantee its derived checking subtasks to be persistently balanced. We evaluated Con-C by controlled experiments through a large-scale real-world application. It reported promising results that Con-C improved the checking efficiency by extra 57.0%, in addition to what had been gained by incremental checking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lv J, Ma X, Hunag Y, et al. Internetware: a shift of software paradigm. In: Proceedings of the 1st Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware, Beijing, 2009. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lv J, Ma X, Tao X, et al. Internetware-oriented environmental driving models and supporting technology (in Chinese). Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2008, 38: 864–900

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lv J, Ma X, Tao X, et al. Research progress on Internetware (in Chinese). Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2006, 36: 1037–1080

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lv J, Ma X, Tao X, et al. Explicit environmental constructs for Internetware (in Chinese). Sci Sinica Inf Sci, 2013, 43: 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu C, Cheung S C. Inconsistency detection and resolution for context-aware middleware support. In: Proceedings of the Joint 10th European Software Engineering Conference and 13th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Lisbon, 2005. 336–345

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu C, Cheung S C, Chan W K. Incremental consistency checking for pervasive context. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, Shanghai, 2006. 292–301

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu C, Cheung S C, Chan W K, et al. Partial constraint checking for context consistency. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol, 2010, 19: 1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garfinkel S, Rosenberg B. RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy. Addison-Wesley, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeffery S R, Garofalakis M, Frankin M J. Adaptive cleaning for RFID data streams. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Seoul, 2006. 163–174

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rao J, Doraiswamy S, Thakkar H, et al. A deferred cleansing method for RFID data analytics. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Seoul, 2006. 175–186

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu C, Cheung S C, Chan W K, et al. Heuristics-based strategies for resolving context inconsistencies in pervasive computing applications. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Beijing, 2008. 713–721

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu C, Cheung S C, Chan W K, et al. On impact-oriented automatic resolution of pervasive context inconsistency. In: Proceedings of the 6th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Dubrovnik, 2007. 569–572

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu C, Ma X, Cao C, et al. Minimizing the side effect of context inconsistency resolution for ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of the 8th ICST International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, LNICST 104, Copenhagen, 2011. 285–297

    Google Scholar 

  14. Egyed A. Instant consistency checking for the UML. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, Shanghai, 2006. 381–390

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiss S P. Incremental maintenance of software artifacts. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2006, 32: 682–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiong Y, Hu Z, Zhao H, et al. Supporting automatic model inconsistency fixing. In: Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Amsterdam, 2009. 315–324

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nentwich C, Capra L, Emmerich W, et al. xlinkit: a consistency checking and smart link generation service. ACM Trans Internet Technol, 2002, 2: 151–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nentwich C, Emmerich W, Finkelstein A, et al. Flexible consistency checking. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol, 2003, 12: 28–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Demsky B, Rinard M. Data structure repair using goal-directed reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, St. Louis, 2005. 176–185

    Google Scholar 

  20. Demsky B, Rinard M. Goal-directed reasoning for specification-based data structure repair. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2006, 32: 931–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu C, Cheung S C. Decentralized constraint checking for pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (Ph.D. forum), Hong Kong, 2008. 45–48

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salber D, Dey A K, Abowd G D. The context toolkit: aiding the development of context-enabled applications. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, 1999. 434–441

    Google Scholar 

  23. Griswold WG, Boyer R, Brown S W, et al. A component architecture for an extensible, highly integrated context-aware computing infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, 2003. 363–372

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henricksen K, Indulska J. A software engineering framework for context-aware pervasive computing. In: Proceedings the 2nd IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Orlando, 2004. 77–86

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zachariadis S, Mascolo C, Emmerich W. The SATIN component system-a metamodel for engineering adaptable mobile systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2006, 32: 910–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Julien C, Roman G C. Egocentric context-aware programming in ad hoc mobile environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Charleston, 2002. 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  27. Julien C, Roman G C. EgoSpaces: facilitating rapid development of context-aware mobile applications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2006, 32: 281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murphy A L, Picco G P, Roman G C. LIME: a coordination model and middleware supporting mobility of hosts and agents. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol, 2006, 15: 279–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranganathan A, Campbell R H. An infrastructure for context-awareness based on first order logic. Pers Ubiquitous Comput, 2003, 7: 353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu C, Cheung S C, Lo C, et al. Cabot: on the ontology for the middleware support of context-aware pervasive applications. In: Proceedings of the NPC 2004 Workshop on Building Intelligent Sensor Networks, Wuhan, 2004. 568–575

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu C, Cheung S C, Ma X, et al. ADAM: identifying defects in context-aware adaptation. J Syst Softw, 2012, 85: 2812–2828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu C, Cheung S C, Ma X, et al. Dynamic fault detection in context-aware adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware, Qingdao, 2012. 1–10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu C, Cheung S C, Ma X, et al. Detecting faults in context-aware adaptation. Int J Softw Inf, 2013, 7: 85–111

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lu H, Chan W, Tse T. Testing context-aware middleware-centric programs: a data flow approach and a RFID-based experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Portland, 2006. 242–252

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lu H, Chan W, Tse T. Testing pervasive software in the presence of context inconsistency resolution services. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, Leipzig, 2008. 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Elbaum S, Rosenblum D S. Automated generation of context-aware tests. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, Minneapolis, 2007. 406–415

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sama M, Rosenblum D S, Wang Z, et al. Multi-layer faults in the architectures of mobile, context-aware adaptive applications. J Syst Softw, 2010, 83: 906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sama M, Elbaum S, Raimondi F, et al. Context-aware adaptive applications: fault patterns and their automated identification. IEEE Trans Softw Eng, 2010, 36: 644–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sama M, Rosenblum D S, Wang Z, et al. Model-based fault detection in context-aware adaptive applications. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Atlanta, 2008. 261–271

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Y, Xu C, Cheung S C. AFChecker: effective model checking for context-aware adaptive applications. J Syst Softw, 2013, 86: 854–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xiong Y, Hubaux A, She S, et al. Generating range fixes for software configuration. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, Zurich, 2012. 58–68

    Google Scholar 

  42. Falleri J R, Blanc X, Bendraou R, et al. Incremental inconsistency detection with low memory overhead. Softw Pract Exper, 2012, doi: 10.1002/spe.2171

  43. Bu Y, Gu T, Tao X, et al. Managing quality of context in pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Quality Software, Beijing, 2006. 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  44. Insuk P, Lee D, Hyun S J. A dynamic context-conflict management scheme for group-aware ubiquitous computing environments. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Edinburgh, 2005. 359–364

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chomicki J, Lobo J, Naqvi S. Conflict resolution using logic programming. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 2003, 15: 244–249

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang H, Xu C, Ma X, et al. ConsView: towards application-specific consistent context views. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Izmir, 2012. 632–637

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, C., Liu, Y., Cheung, S.C. et al. Towards context consistency by concurrent checking for Internetware applications. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 56, 1–20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4907-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4907-5

Keywords

Navigation