Abstract
This paper provides a way to optimize the overall disturbances rejection performance of the adaptive control system in the presence of unknown external disturbances. Especially, the updatable non-empty admissible model set, which is consistent to the a priori knowledge of the plant parameter and the online measurements, is computed. With the overall system performance as the criteria, the nominal model is optimally chosen within the admissible model set. The optimal nominal model is subsequently used to synthesize the optimal closed-loop controller based on the ℓ1 design methodology. Combining the above two aspects, an optimal adaptive control scheme is proposed. Because of the consistency of the identification criteria and control object, the adaptive control scheme proposed in this paper can achieve the overall optimal disturbances rejection performance, and the effect of the interplay between the identification and control of the adaptive system can be handled effectively. In addition, the computable optimal performance is also provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goodwin G C, Sin K S. Adaptive Filtering, Prediction and Control. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984
Zames G, Wang L Y. Local-global double algebras for slow H ∞ adaptation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1991, AC-36: 130–142
Krause J M, Khargonekar P P, Stein G. Robust adaptive control: stability and asymptotic performance. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1992, AC-37: 316–331
Krause J M, Stein G, Khargonekar P P. Sufficient conditions for robust performance of adaptive controllers with general uncertainty structure. Automatica, 1992, 28: 277–288
Dahleh M, Dahleh M A. Optimal rejection of persistent and bounded disturbances: continuity properties and adaptation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1990, AC-35: 687–696
Li S P. Robust adaptive control of uncertain systems with guaranteed robust stability and asymptotic performance. Int J Syst Sci, 2011, 42: 1007–1022
Li S P, Chai T Y. A new adaptive control scheme and analysis of its closed loop stability. Chinese J Automat, 1999, 11: 277–284
Li S P. On continuity properties of the two-block ℓ1 optimal design. Syst Control Lett, 2002, 47: 47–55
Li S P. Robust adaptive tracking control of uncertain discrete time systems. Int J Adapt Control, 2005, 19: 723–739
Dahleh M, Dahleh M A. On slowly time-varying systems. Automatica, 1991, 27: 201–205
Naik S M, Kumar P R. Robust indirect adaptive control of time-varying plants with unmodeled dynamics and disturbances. SIAM J Control Optim, 1994, 32: 1696–1725
Sun J, Ioannou P. Robust adaptive LQ control schemes. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1992, AC37: 100–106
Makila P M, Partington J R, Gustafsson T K. Robust identification. In: 10th IFAC Symposium on System Identification. Copenh-agen, 1993. 1–11
Tse D N, Dahleh M A, Tsitsilis J N. Optimal asymptotic identification under bounded disturbances. IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1993, AC-38: 1176–1190
Li S P. ℓ1 robust identification: a recursive interpolatory algorithm. Contr Theor Appl, 2002, 19: 932–936
Vidyasagar M. Control System Synthesis: a Factorization Approach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985
Dahleh M A, Diaz-Bobilllo I J. Control of Uncertain Systems: a Linear Programming Approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1995
Mendlovitz M A. A simple solution to the ℓ1 optimization problem. Syst Control Lett, 1989, 12: 461–463
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, S., Fan, Y. An adaptive control with optimal disturbances rejection. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 1704–1714 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4499-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4499-x