Skip to main content
Log in

Protective cleaning of Chinese paper artworks with strong hydrogels: An interfacial adhesion perspective

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Up to now, it is always a delicate and challenging task to clean and protect Xuan paper ink painting. Xuan paper is composed of cellulose with a rough surface and easy to absorb dust, which leads to poor cleaning effect and irreversible damage in traditional cleaning process. Hydrogel is one of the most effective tools to clean the artworks. However, in the practice of cleaning Xuan paper, most hydrogels cannot achieve fine cleaning result due to the interfacial adhesion issues. Herein, to protectively and effectively clean Xuan paper, using physical yet strong poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acrylamide) (PVA/PHEAA) hydrogel with suitable stiffness as the model, the interfacial adhesion between hydrogel and Xuan paper was systematically investigated, and various technologies were used to evaluate the cleaning effect. A critical interfacial adhesive energy (< 4 J/m2) is found to achieve the protective and effective cleaning purpose. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to estimate the adhesion of hydrogel on the cleaning of paper artwork, which will provide a new viewport in the conservation practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Fang Y, Liu X, Zheng H, et al. Bio-inspired fabrication of nacremimetic hybrid nanocoating for eco-friendly fire-resistant precious cellulosic Chinese Xuan paper. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2020, 235: 115782–115789

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deng L, Zhang Y, Wei S, et al. Highly foldable and flexible films of pedot: PSS/Xuan paper composites for thermoelectric applications. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 8317–8324

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guan Q F, Yang K P, Han Z M, et al. Sustainable multiscale high-haze transparent cellulose fiber film via a biomimetic approach. ACS Mater Lett, 2021, 4: 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fang Y, Chen L, Wu J, et al. Fire-resistant and antibacterial Chinese Xuan paper by fully bio-based chitosan/phytic acid coating on pulp fibers. Industrial Crops Products, 2022, 187: 115456

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cai Y, Huang Z, Cheung M H C, et al. Elemental analysis of Chinese black inks on Xuan paper by ArF laser-excited plume fluorescence. Anal Chem, 2016, 88: 10971–10978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fang S, Li G, Fu X. Biomass production and bark yield in the plantations of pteroceltis tatarinowii. Biomass Bioenergy, 2004, 26: 319–328

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luo Y, Cigić I K, Wei Q, et al. Characterisation and durability of contemporary unsized Xuan paper. Cellulose, 2020, 28: 1011–1023

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong L Y, Zhu Y J. Fire-resistant inorganic analogous Xuan paper with thousands of years’ super-durability. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2018, 6: 17239–17251

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng J, Ma J, Pang X, et al. Non-destructive quantitative analysis of nano-mechanics of aged Xuan paper. J Cultural Heritage, 2020, 46: 155–158

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tseng H Y, Lizama J H, Shen Y W, et al. The pursuit of further miniaturization of screen printed micro paper-based analytical devices utilizing controlled penetration towards optimized channel patterning. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 21496–21509

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mazzuca C, Micheli L, Carbone M, et al. Gellan hydrogel as a powerful tool in paper cleaning process: A detailed study. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2014, 416: 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isca C, Fuster-López L, Yusá-Marco D J, et al. An evaluation of changes induced by wet cleaning treatments in the mechanical properties of paper artworks. Cellulose, 2015, 22: 3047–3062

    Google Scholar 

  13. Micheli L, Mazzuca C, Palleschi A, et al. Development of a diagnostic and cleaning tool for paper artworks: A case of study. MicroChem J, 2016, 126: 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chelazzi D, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Microemulsions, micelles, and functional gels: How colloids and soft matter preserve works of art. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57: 7296–7303

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bonelli N, Montis C, Mirabile A, et al. Restoration of paper artworks with microemulsions confined in hydrogels for safe and efficient removal of adhesive tapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 5932–5937

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Severini L, Titubante M, et al. Gellan gum hydrogel as an aqueous treatment method for Xuan paper. Restaurator Int J Preservat Library Archival Material, 2021, 42: 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barrulas R V, Nunes A D, Sequeira S O, et al. Cleaning fungal stains on paper with hydrogels: The effect of pH control. Int Biodeteriorat Biodegradat, 2020, 152: 104996

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Filpo G, Palermo A M, Tolmino R, et al. Gellan gum hybrid hydrogels for the cleaning of paper artworks contaminated with aspergillus versicolor. Cellulose, 2016, 23: 3265–3279

    Google Scholar 

  19. Casoli A, Isca C, De Iasio S, et al. Analytical evaluation, by GC/MS, of gelatine removal from ancient papers induced by wet cleaning: A comparison between immersion treatment and application of rigid gellan gum gel. MicroChem J, 2014, 117: 61–67

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jia Y, Sciutto G, Mazzeo R, et al. Organogel coupled with micro-structured electrospun polymeric nonwovens for the effective cleaning of sensitive surfaces. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 39620–39629

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mazzuca C, Micheli L, Cervelli E, et al. Cleaning of paper artworks: Development of an efficient gel-based material able to remove starch paste. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2014, 6: 16519–16528

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baglioni M, Poggi G, Chelazzi D, et al. Advanced materials in cultural heritage conservation. Molecules, 2021, 26: 3967–3986

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baglioni P, Chelazzi D. How science can contribute to the remedial conservation of cultural heritage. Chem Eur J, 2021, 27: 10798–10806

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bertasa M, Canevali C, Sansonetti A, et al. An in-depth study on the Agar gel effectiveness for built heritage cleaning. J Cultural Heritage, 2021, 47: 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bonelli N, Poggi G, Chelazzi D, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) hydrogels for the cleaning of art. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2019, 536: 339–348

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mastrangelo R, Chelazzi D, Poggi G, et al. Twin-chain polymer hydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol) as new advanced tool for the cleaning of modern and contemporary art. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 7011–7020

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hu X, Wang Y, Zhang L, et al. Fabrication of salecan/poly(AMPS-co-HMAA) semi-IPN hydrogels for cell adhesion. Carbohydrate Polyms, 2017, 174: 171–181

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Sun X, Gan D, et al. Bioadhesive and conductive hydrogel-integrated brain-machine interfaces for conformal and immune-evasive contact with brain tissue. Matter, 2022, 5: 1204–1223

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo Z C, Yao M M, Sun H, et al. Tyramine-enhanced zwitterion hyaluronan hydrogel coating for anti-fouling and anti-thrombosis. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1828–1844

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baglioni M, Poggi G, Giorgi R, et al. Selective removal of over-paintings from “Street Art” using an environmentally friendly nanostructured fluid loaded in highly retentive hydrogels. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2021, 595: 187–201

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pensabene Buemi L, Petruzzellis M L, Chelazzi D, et al. Twin-chain polymer networks loaded with nanostructured fluids for the selective removal of a non-original varnish from picasso’s “L’Atelier” at the peggy guggenheim collection, venice. Herit Sci, 2020, 8: 77–92

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mirabile A, Chelazzi D, Ferrari P, et al. Innovative methods for the removal, and occasionally care, of pressure sensitive adhesive tapes from contemporary drawings. Herit Sci, 2020, 8: 42–57

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Q L, Zhu L, Wei D D, et al. Near-infrared responsive shape memory hydrogels with programmable and complex shape-morphing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1752–1764

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Li C, Yang H, et al. A flexible organohydrogel-based humidity sensor for noncontact artificial sensation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 65: 191–200

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y H, Cui C Y, Sun Y G, et al. A hyperbranched polymer-based water-resistant adhesive: Durable underwater adhesion and primer for anchoring anti-fouling hydrogel coating. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 65: 201–213

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li K, Zan X, Tang C, et al. Tough, instant, and repeatable adhesion of self-healable elastomers to diverse soft and hard surfaces. Adv Sci, 2022, 9: 2105742

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gong J P. Materials both tough and soft. Science, 2014, 344: 161–162

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cui W, Zhu R, Zheng Y, et al. Transforming non-adhesive hydrogels to reversible tough adhesives via mixed-solvent-induced phase separation. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9: 9706–9718

    Google Scholar 

  39. Steck J, Yang J, Suo Z. Covalent topological adhesion. ACS Macro Lett, 2019, 8: 754–758

    Google Scholar 

  40. Domingues J A L, Bonelli N, Giorgi R, et al. Innovative hydrogels based on semi-interpenetrating P(HEMA)/PVP networks for the cleaning of water-sensitive cultural heritage artifacts. Langmuir, 2013, 29: 2746–2755

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang J, Yu X, Sun X, et al. Polyaniline-decorated supramolecular hydrogel with tough, fatigue-resistant, and self-healable performances for all-in-one flexible supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 9736–9745

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wu S, Tang L, Xu Y, et al. A self-powered flexible sensing system based on a super-tough, high ionic conductivity supercapacitor and a rapid self-recovering fully physically crosslinked double network hydrogel. J Mater Chem C, 2022, 10: 3027–3035

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yang J, Tang C, Sun H, et al. Tough, transparent, and anti-freezing nanocomposite organohydrogels with photochromic properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 31180–31192

    Google Scholar 

  44. Guo Y, Vasconcelos L S, Manohar N, et al. Highly elastic interconnected porous hydrogels through self-assembled templating for solar water purification. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e202114074

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huang Y, Zhong M, Shi F, et al. An intrinsically stretchable and compressible supercapacitor containing a polyacrylamide hydrogel electrolyte. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56: 9141–9145

    Google Scholar 

  46. Qu G, Li Y, Yu Y, et al. Spontaneously regenerative tough hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2019, 58: 10951–10955

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xing Z, Caciagli A, Cao T, et al. Microrheology of DNA hydrogels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 8137–8142

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cuccia N L, Pothineni S, Wu B, et al. Pore-size dependence and slow relaxation of hydrogel friction on smooth surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 11247–11256

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nakamura K, Hatakeyama T, Hatakeyama H. Relationship between hydrogen bonding and bound water in polyhydroxystyrene derivatives. Polymer, 1983, 24: 871–876

    Google Scholar 

  50. Haynes W, Thomas J. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yuk H, Zhang T, Lin S, et al. Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 190–196

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao X. Designing toughness and strength for soft materials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114: 8138–8140

    Google Scholar 

  53. Asscher Y, van Zuiden A, Elimelech C, et al. Prescreening hydraulic lime-binders for disordered calcite in caesarea maritima: Characterizing the chemical environment using ftir. Radiocarbon, 2020, 62: 527–543

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liu Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, et al. Shape-preserving amorphous-to-crystalline transformation of CaCO3 revealed by in situ TEM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2020, 117: 3397–3404

    Google Scholar 

  55. Addadi L, Moradian J, Shay E, et al. A chemical model for the cooperation of sulfates and carboxylates in calcite crystal nucleation: Relevance to biomineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987, 84: 2732–2736

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zeng M, Kim Y Y, Anduix-Canto C, et al. Confinement generates single-crystal aragonite rods at room temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115: 7670–7675

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hui Yu, LiJian Xu or Qiang Chen.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Excellent Youth Fund Project of Henan Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 202300410166), the Major Project of Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos. WIUCASQD2021004 and WIUCASQD2021035), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21504022 and 22202051).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supporting Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Nie, Z., Yu, H. et al. Protective cleaning of Chinese paper artworks with strong hydrogels: An interfacial adhesion perspective. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 2681–2695 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2425-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2425-0

Keywords

Navigation