Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity analysis of modeling parameters to soot and PAHs prediction in ethylene inverse diffusion flame

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soot formation model based on inverse ethylene diffusion flames was performed to study the sensitivity of the soot formation process to the prediction results. The effects of efficiency parameters such as soot inception, surface growth and coagulation on the simulation results were studied by using the adjustable efficiency model. In addition, the reversible soot model and conjugate heat transfer (CHT) model were also introduced to explore their advantages. Results indicated that, among adjustable efficiency parameters, the nucleation efficiency had the greatest influence on the predicted soot and PAHs distributions, while the H-abstraction-C2H2-addition (HACA) process and PAH adsorption surface growth efficiencies impacted little. The adjustable efficiency parameters had a significant effect on the concentration of soot gaseous precursors and soot particles, but their effects on temperature, gas phase molecules, and intermediate species were not obvious. When the nucleation efficiency increased from 2×10−6 to 1×10−4, the predicted value of the integrated soot was increased by nearly 50%, and the maximum primary particle number density and the number of aggregates were increased by an order of magnitude. The maximum concentration of BAPYR was doubled. However, the peak temperature along the axial direction increased by only 3.5 K. Using the reversible soot model, the approximation results of the adjustable efficiency parameters could be modified, which showed the feasibility of the model. The use of the CHT model promoted pyrolysis of the fuel below the outlet of the fuel tube, with high-temperature zones, soot zones, and PAHs zones moving towards higher flame heights. Besides, when using the reversible model and the CHT model, the maximum soot volume fraction decreased by 39% compared with the basic efficiency parameters, while the concentration of BAPYR increased by 162%, and the concentrations of gas phase species were decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frenklach M, Clary D W, Gardiner Jr. W C, et al. Effect of fuel structure on pathways to soot. Symposium (Int) Combust, 1988, 21: 1067–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slavinskaya N A, Frank P. A modelling study of aromatic soot precursors formation in laminar methane and ethene flames. Combust Flame, 2009, 156: 1705–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michelsen H A. Probing soot formation, chemical and physical evolution, and oxidation: A review of in situ diagnostic techniques and needs. Proc Combust Inst, 2017, 36: 717–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Gu M, Zhu Y, et al. A review of the effects of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and water vapor addition on soot formation in hydrocarbon flames. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 31400–31427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbaz A M, Roberts W L. Experimental study of the inverse diffusion flame using high repetition rate OH/acetone PLIF and PIV. Fuel, 2016, 165: 447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Escudero F, Fuentes A, Demarco R, et al. Effects of oxygen index on soot production and temperature in an ethylene inverse diffusion flame. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci, 2016, 73: 101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lou C, Li Z, Zhang Y, et al. Soot formation characteristics in laminar coflow flames with application to oxy-combustion. Combust Flame, 2021, 227: 371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansouri A, Eaves N A, Thomson M J, et al. Influence of pressure on near nozzle flow field and soot formation in laminar co-flow diffusion flames. Combust Theor Model, 2018, 23: 536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamal M M. Soot formation and oxidation in normal and inverse diffusion flames. Proc Inst Mech Engineers Part A-J Power Energy, 2007, 221: 481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paladpokkrong C, Liu D, Ying Y, et al. Soot reduction by addition of dimethyl carbonate in normal and inverse ethylene diffusion flames: Nanostructural evidence. J Environ Sci, 2018, 72: 107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaddix C R, Williams T C, Blevins L G, et al. Flame structure of steady and pulsed sooting inverse jet diffusion flames. Proc Combust Inst, 2005, 30: 1501–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eaves N A, Zhang Q, Liu F, et al. CoFlame: A refined and validated numerical algorithm for modeling sooting laminar coflow diffusion flames. Comput Phys Commun, 2016, 207: 464–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Ma J, Dong F, et al. Experimental investigation of the effects of diesel fuel properties on combustion and emissions on a multi-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 171: 1787–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng L, Wang Q, Liu H, et al. Effect of the stagnation plate on PAHs, soot and OH distributions in partially premixed laminar flames fueled with a blend of n-heptane and toluene. Combust Flame, 2021, 227: 52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jerez A, Consalvi J L, Fuentes A, et al. Soot production modeling in a laminar coflow ethylene diffusion flame at different Oxygen Indices using a PAH-based sectional model. Fuel, 2018, 231: 404–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mansouri A, Zimmer L, Dworkin S B, et al. Impact of pressure-based HACA rates on soot formation in varying-pressure coflow laminar diffusion flames. Combust Flame, 2020, 218: 109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu F, He X, Ma X, et al. An experimental and numerical study of the effects of dimethyl ether addition to fuel on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and soot formation in laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flames. Combust Flame, 2011, 158: 547–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitra T, Amidpour Y, Chu C, et al. On the growth of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a coflow diffusion flame of ethylene. Proc Combust Inst, 2021, 38: 1507–1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khanehzar A, Cepeda F, Dworkin S B. The influence of nitrogen and hydrogen addition/dilution on soot formation in coflow ethylene/air diffusion flames. Fuel, 2022, 309: 122244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaher M H, Chu C, Dadsetan M, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of soot growth and inception in an ammonia-ethylene flame. Proc Combust Inst, 2023, 39: 929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitra T, Chu C, Naseri A, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation in a flame of the alkylated aromatic trimethylbenzene compared to those ofthe alkane dodecane. Combust Flame, 2021, 223: 495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu C, Zhang T, Thomson M J. The chemical structure effects of alkylbenzenes on soot formation in a laminar co-flow flame. Combust Flame, 2019, 204: 237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu M, Liu F, Consalvi J L, et al. Effects of pressure on soot formation in laminar coflow methane/air diffusion flames doped with n-heptane and toluene between 2 and 8 atm. Proc Combust Inst, 2021, 38: 1403–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chu C, Zaher M H, Thomson M J. The temperature dependence of soot formation in laminar coflow aromatic flames. Combust Flame, 2022, 241: 112074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khosousi A, Dworkin S B. Detailed modelling of soot oxidation by O2 and OH in laminar diffusion flames. Proc Combust Inst, 2015, 35: 1903–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson M J. Modeling soot formation in flames and reactors: Recent progress and current challenges. Proc Combust Inst, 2023, 39: 805–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dworkin S B, Zhang Q, Thomson M J, et al. Application of an enhanced PAH growth model to soot formation in a laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flame. Combust Flame, 2011, 158: 1682–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eaves N A, Veshkini A, Riese C, et al. A numerical study of high pressure, laminar, sooting, ethane-air coflow diffusion flames. Combust Flame, 2012, 159: 3179–3190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li T, Mitra T, Chu C, et al. Investigation of PAH and soot formation in a dimethyl ether (DME) laminar coflow diffusion flame. Combust Flame, 2021, 223: 437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chu C, Amidpour Y, Eaves N A, et al. An experimental and numerical study of the effects of reactant temperatures on soot formation in a coflow diffusion ethylene flame. Combust Flame, 2021, 233: 111574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun M, Gan Z, Yang Y. Numerical and experimental investigation of soot precursor and primary particle size of aviation fuel (RP-3) and n-dodecane in laminar flame. J Energy Institute, 2021, 94: 49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eaves N A, Thomson M J, Dworkin S B. The effect of conjugate heat transfer on soot formation modeling at elevated pressures. Combust Sci Tech, 2013, 185: 1799–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu H, Geng C, Yang Z, et al. Effect of wall temperature on acetylene diffusion flame-wall interaction based on optical diagnostics and CFD simulation. Energies, 2018, 11: 1264–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu H, Cui Y, Chen B, et al. Effects of flame temperature on PAHs and soot evolution in partially premixed and diffusion flames of a diesel surrogate. Energy Fuels, 2019, 33: 11821–11829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eaves N A, Dworkin S B, Thomson M J. The importance of reversibility in modeling soot nucleation and condensation processes. Proc Combust Inst, 2015, 35: 1787–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Demarco R, Jerez A, Liu F, et al. Modeling soot formation in laminar coflow ethylene inverse diffusion flames. Combust Flame, 2021, 232: 111513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ying Y, Liu D. Effects of butanol isomers additions on soot nanostructure and reactivity in normal and inverse ethylene diffusion flames. Fuel, 2017, 205: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ying Y, Liu D. Effects of flame configuration and soot aging on soot nanostructure and reactivity in n-butanol-doped ethylene diffusion flames. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32: 607–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McEnally C S, Köylü Ü Ö, Pfefferle L D, et al. Soot volume fraction and temperature measurements in laminar nonpremixed flames using thermocouples. Combust Flame, 1997, 109: 701–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar S, Ramkrishna D. On the solution of population balance equations by discretization—I. A fixed pivot technique. Chem Eng, 1996, 51: 1311–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Appel J, Bockhorn H, Frenklach M. Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed chemistry and physics: Laminar premixed flames of C2 hydrocarbons. Combust Flame, 2000, 121: 122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eaves N A, Dworkin S B, Thomson M J. Assessing relative contributions of PAHs to soot mass by reversible heterogeneous nucleation and condensation. Proc Combust Inst, 2017, 36: 935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Veshkini A, Eaves N A, Dworkin S B, et al. Application of PAH-condensation reversibility in modeling soot growth in laminar pre-mixed and nonpremixed flames. Combust Flame, 2016, 167: 335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Slavinskaya N A, Riedel U, Dworkin S B, et al. Detailed numerical modeling of PAH formation and growth in non-premixed ethylene and ethane flames. Combust Flame, 2012, 159: 979–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shui C Y, Liu H C, Cai W W. Benchmark evaluation of tomographic algorithms for simultaneous reconstruction of temperature and volume fraction fields of soot and metal-oxide nanoparticles in non-uniform flames. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shi J W, Qi H, Yu Z Q, et al. Three-dimensional temperature reconstruction of diffusion flame from the light-field convolution imaging by the focused plenoptic camera. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 302–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang L J, Liu D. Formation and characteristics of soot from pyrolysis of ethylene blended with furan fuels. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 585–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Botero M L, Eaves N, Dreyer J A H, et al. Experimental and numerical study of the evolution of soot primary particles in a diffusion flame. Proc Combust Inst, 2019, 37: 2047–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu K T, Essenhigh R H. Mapping and structure of inverse diffusion flames of methane. Symp (Int) Combust, 1985, 20: 1925–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang H. Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames. Proc Combust Inst, 2011, 33: 41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang H, Frenklach M. A detailed kinetic modeling study of aromatics formation in laminar premixed acetylene and ethylene flames. Combust Flame, 1997, 110: 173–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McEnally C S, Pfefferle L D, Atakan B, et al. Studies of aromatic hydrocarbon formation mechanisms in flames: Progress towards closing the fuel gap. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2006, 32: 247–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hansen N, Miller J A, Klippenstein S J, et al. Exploring formation pathways of aromatic compounds in laboratory-based model flames of aliphatic fuels. Combust Explos Shock Waves, 2012, 48: 508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Georgievskii Y, Miller J A, Klippenstein S J. Association rate constants for reactions between resonance-stabilized radicals: C3H3 + C3H3, C3H3 + C3H5, and C3H5 + C3H5. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2007, 9: 4259–4268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Miller J A, Klippenstein S J, Georgievskii Y, et al. Reactions between resonance-stabilized radicals: Propargyl + allyl. J Phys Chem A, 2010, 114: 4881–4890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Frenklach M, Clary D W, Gardiner Jr. W C, et al. Detailed kinetic modeling of soot formation in shock-tube pyrolysis of acetylene. Symp (Int) Combust, 1985, 20: 887–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Frenklach M, Wang H. Detailed modeling of soot particle nucleation and growth. Symp (Int) Combust, 1991, 23: 1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kazakov A, Wang H, Frenklach M. Detailed modeling of soot formation in laminar premixed ethylene flames at a pressure of 10 bar. Combust Flame, 1995, 100: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kaplan C R, Kailasanath K. Flow-field effects on soot formation in normal and inverse methane-air diffusion flames. Combust Flame, 2001, 124: 275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kaplan C R, Patnaik G, Kailasanath K. Universal relationships in sooting methane-air diffusion flames. Combust Sci Tech, 1998, 131: 39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MIIT Key Laboratory of Thermal Control of Electronic Equipment, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China

    BingKun Wu, TianJiao Li & Dong Liu

  2. Advanced Combustion Laboratory, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210094, China

    BingKun Wu, TianJiao Li & Dong Liu

Authors
  1. BingKun Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. TianJiao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to TianJiao Li or Dong Liu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. BK20220955), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52076110), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M701719), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 30922010409).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at tech.scichina.com and link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supplementary Material To

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, B., Li, T. & Liu, D. Sensitivity analysis of modeling parameters to soot and PAHs prediction in ethylene inverse diffusion flame. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 67, 486–498 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2386-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2386-7

Search

Navigation