Skip to main content
Log in

Neuromorphic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (nTENS) induces efficient tactile-related cortical networks in forearm amputees

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (cTENS), which uses a modulated square waveform as stimuli, has been generally used in testing and eliciting artificial tactile perception in forearm amputees. However, a novel neuromorphic TENS (nTENS) model based on neural signals has been largely ignored. In this study, we further explore the effect of nTENS patterns to elicit tactile perception in forearm amputees. Four forearm amputees were recruited to test discriminate tactile perception elicited by different TENS patterns with electroencephalography (EEG) recording at the following four stimulated sites: the index finger and the little finger on both phantom and real sides. Finally, we compared the results of cortical networks in six frequency bands at different stimulated sites between forearm amputees and able-bodied subjects. Behavioral results suggested that nTENS patterns required a lower electric charge at each stimulated site than cTENS patterns. And forearm amputees required a higher intensity in each TENS pattern than able-bodied subjects. Moreover, amputees showed a lower clustering coefficient (aCP), global efficiency (aEG), local efficiency (aEL), and a longer path length (aLP) than able-bodied subjects in all six frequency bands when stimulation was accessed. Specifically, the SMU pattern showed a higher functional network efficiency in real fingers than at phantom sites in theta, alpha, and high gamma bands. This study highlighted the characteristics of nTENS patterns in eliciting tactile perception among forearm amputees, which provided insights into evaluating the neural mechanism of tactile information processing in forearm amputees and building tactile perceptual systems for sensory rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ramachandran V S, Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 1998, 121: 1603–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang B, Jiang L, Ge C Y, et al. Control of myoelectric prosthetic hand with a novel proximity-tactile sensor. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1513–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chai G H, Li S, Sui X H, et al. Phantom finger perception evoked with transcutaneous electrical stimulation for sensory feedback of prosthetic hand. In: 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). San Diego, 2013. 271–274

  4. Yin P Y, Hao M Z, Liu X D, et al. Neural correlation between evoked tactile sensation and central activities in the somatosensory cortex. In: 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Honolulu, 2018. 2296–2299

  5. Vargas L, Whitehouse G, Huang H, et al. Evoked haptic sensation in the hand with concurrent non-invasive nerve stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2019, 66: 2761–2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Valle G, Strauss I, D’Anna E, et al. Sensitivity to temporal parameters of intraneural tactile sensory feedback. J NeuroEng Rehabil, 2020, 17: 110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai G, Sui X, Li S, et al. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. J Neural Eng, 2015, 12: 066002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li M, Zhang D, Chen Y, et al. Discrimination and recognition of phantom finger sensation through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Front Neurosci, 2018, 12: 283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Osborn L E, Dragomir A, Betthauser J L, et al. Prosthesis with neuromorphic multilayered e-dermis perceives touch and pain. Sci Robot, 2018, 3

  10. Su S, Chai G, Sheng X, et al. Contra-lateral desynchronized alpha oscillations linearly correlate with discrimination performance of tactile acuity. J Neural Eng, 2020, 17: 046041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Su S, Chai G, Shu X, et al. Electrical stimulation-induced SSSEP as an objective index to evaluate the difference of tactile acuity between the left and right hand. J Neural Eng, 2020, 17: 016053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Anna E, Petrini F M, Artoni F, et al. A somatotopic bidirectional hand prosthesis with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation based sensory feedback. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 10930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding K, Dragomir A, Bose R, et al. Towards machine to brain interfaces: Sensory stimulation enhances sensorimotor dynamic functional connectivity in upper limb amputees. J Neural Eng, 2020, 17: 035002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss I, Valle G, Artoni F, et al. Characterization of multi-channel intraneural stimulation in transradial amputees. Sci Rep, 2019, 9: 19258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang D, Xu F, Xu H, et al. Quantifying different tactile sensations evoked by cutaneous electrical stimulation using electroencephalography features. Int J Neur Syst, 2016, 26: 1650006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pleger B, Villringer A. The human somatosensory system: From perception to decision making. Prog Neurobiol, 2013, 103: 76–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hatlestad-Hall C, Bruña R, Syvertsen M R, et al. Source-level EEG and graph theory reveal widespread functional network alterations in focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol, 2021, 132: 1663–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasanzadeh F, Mohebbi M, Rostami R. Graph theory analysis of directed functional brain networks in major depressive disorder based on EEG signal. J Neural Eng, 2020, 17: 026010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu S F, Wang L B, Zhao Y W, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation induces functional network changes in cortical neuron cultures. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2009, 10: 186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 2010, 52: 1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stam C J, Reijneveld J C. Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed Phys, 2007, 1: 3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Wu W, Toll R T, et al. Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography. Nat Biomed Eng, 2021, 5: 309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frolov N S, Maksimenko V A, Khramova M V, et al. Dynamics of functional connectivity in multilayer cortical brain network during sensory information processing. Eur Phys J Spec Top, 2019, 228: 2381–2389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang D P, Liu H. Human-machine shared control: New avenue to dexterous prosthetic hand manipulation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oddo C M, Raspopovic S, Artoni F, et al. Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans. eLife, 2016, 5: e09148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Xi P, Li B, et al. Effect of neuromorphic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (nTENS) of cortical functional networks on tactile perceptions: An event-related electroencephalogram study. J Neural Eng, 2022, 19: 026017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pascoe M A, Enoka J A, Enoka R M. Discharge characteristics of motor units during long contractions. Soc Neurosci Abstr 652.13, 2006. [Online dataset R010, available at http://www.emglab.net]

  29. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods, 2004, 134: 9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Destrieux C, Fischl B, Dale A, et al. Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. NeuroImage, 2010, 53: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lachaux J P, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, et al. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp, 1999, 8: 194–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J, Wang X, Xia M, et al. GRETNA: A graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging connectomics. Front Hum Neurosci, 2015, 9: 386

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet viewer: A network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e68910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hao M, Chou C H, Zhang J, et al. Restoring finger-specific sensory feedback for transradial amputees via non-invasive evoked tactile sensation. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol, 2020, 1: 98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Björkman A, Weibull A, Olsrud J, et al. Phantom digit somatotopy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in forearm amputees. Eur J Neurosci, 2012, 36: 2098–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ives G C, Kung T A, Nghiem B T, et al. Current state of the surgical treatment of terminal neuromas. Neurosurgery, 2018, 83: 354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moore C I, Crosier E, Greve D N, et al. Neocortical correlates of vibrotactile detection in humans. J Cogn Neurosci, 2013, 25: 49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schröder P, Schmidt T T, Blankenburg F. Neural basis of somatosensory target detection independent of uncertainty, relevance, and reports. eLife, 2019, 8: e43410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Auksztulewicz R, Spitzer B, Blankenburg F. Recurrent neural processing and somatosensory awareness. J Neurosci, 2012, 32: 799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dehaene S, Changeux J P, Naccache L, et al. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci, 2006, 10: 204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Grund M, Forschack N, Nierhaus T, et al. Neural correlates of conscious tactile perception: An analysis of bold activation patterns and graph metrics. NeuroImage, 2021, 224: 117384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yıldırım E, Güntekin B, Hanoğlu L, et al. EEG alpha activity increased in response to transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation in young healthy subjects but not in the healthy elderly. PeerJ, 2020, 8: e8330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Genna C, Oddo C, Fanciullacci C, et al. Bilateral cortical representation of tactile roughness. Brain Res, 2018, 1699: 79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kanayama N, Hara M, Kimura K. Virtual reality alters cortical oscillations related to visuo-tactile integration during rubber hand illusion. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Adhikari B M, Sathian K, Epstein C M, et al. Oscillatory activity in neocortical networks during tactile discrimination near the limit of spatial acuity. NeuroImage, 2014, 91: 300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Fang P, Tang X, et al. Effective evaluation of finger sensation evoking by non-invasive stimulation for sensory function recovery in transradial amputees. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2022, 30: 519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to LuYao Chen or YiRan Lang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1307301).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Li, B., Xi, P. et al. Neuromorphic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (nTENS) induces efficient tactile-related cortical networks in forearm amputees. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 1451–1460 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2351-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2351-7

Navigation