Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete columns under combined seismic and blast loads

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is possible for certain building structures to encounter both the seismic load and blast load during their service life. With the development of the economy and the increase of security demand, the need for design of building structures against multi-hazard is becoming more and more obvious. Therefore, the damage analysis of building structures under the combined action of multiple hazards has become a very urgent requirement for disaster prevention and reduction. In this paper, the refined finite element model of reinforced concrete (RC) columns is established by using the explicit dynamic analysis software LS-DYNA. Combined with the Monte Carlo method, the damage law of RC columns under the combined action of random single earthquake or explosion disaster and multi-hazard is studied, and the damage groups are distinguished according to the damage index. Based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, the dividing line between different damage degree groups is determined, and a rapid method for determining the damage degree of RC columns under the combined seismic and blast loads is proposed. Finally, suggestions for the design of RC column against multi-disaster are put forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li Y, Ahuja A, Padgett J E. Review of methods to assess, design for, and mitigate multiple hazards. J Perform Constr Facil, 2012, 26: 104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fascetti A, Kunnath S K, Nisticò N. Robustness evaluation of RC frame buildings to progressive collapse. Eng Struct, 2015, 86: 242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin K, Lu X, Li Y, et al. Experimental study of a novel multi-hazard resistant prefabricated concrete frame structure. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2019, 119: 390–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdollahzadeh G, Faghihmaleki H. Seismic-explosion risk-based robustness index of structures. Int J Damage Mech, 2017, 26: 523–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Faghihmaleki H. A plastic design method for RC moment frame buildings against progressive collapse. Makara J Technol, 2017, 21: 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdollahzadeh G, Faghihmaleki H. Probabilistic two-hazard risk assessment of near-fault and far-fault earthquakes in a structure subjected to earthquake-induced gas explosion. J Build Eng, 2017, 13: 298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdollahzadeh G, Faghihmaleki H. Proposal of a probabilistic assessment of structural collapse concomitantly subject to earthquake and gas explosion. Front Struct Civ Eng, 2018, 12: 425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng D C, Xie S C, Xu J, et al. Robustness quantification of reinforced concrete structures subjected to progressive collapse via the probability density evolution method. Eng Struct, 2020, 202: 109877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stochino F, Attoli A, Concu G. Fragility curves for RC structure under blast load considering the influence of seismic demand. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elhami Khorasani N, Garlock M, Gardoni P. Probabilistic performance-based evaluation of a tall steel moment resisting frame under post-earthquake fires. J Struct Fire Eng, 2016, 7: 193–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu Z, Lu Y. Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations. Int J Impact Eng, 2009, 36: 132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallquist J. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Version: 970. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. Malvar L J, Crawford J E, Wesevich J W, et al. A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D. Int J Impact Eng, 1997, 19: 847–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malvar L J, Ross C A. Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. ACI Mater J, 1998, 95: 735–739

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bischoff P H, Perry S H. Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates. Mater Struct, 1991, 24: 425–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Comité Euro-International du Béton. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 1993

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Javier Malvar L, Crawford J E. Dynamic Increase Factors for concrete. In: Twenty-Eighth DDESB Seminar. Orlando, 1998

  18. Mamalis A G, Manolakos D E, Ioannidis M B, et al. Static axial collapse of foam-filled steel thin-walled rectangular tubes: Experimental and numerical simulation. Int J Crashworthiness, 2008, 13: 117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu B, Villavicencio R, Guedes Soares C. Experimental and numerical plastic response and failure of pre-notched transversely impacted beams. Int J Mech Sci, 2013, 77: 314–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B, Villavicencio R, Guedes Soares C. On the failure criterion of aluminum and steel plates subjected to low-velocity impact by a spherical indenter. Int J Mech Sci, 2014, 80: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngo T, Mohotti D, Remennikov A, et al. Numerical simulations of response of tubular steel beams to close-range explosions. J Constr Steel Res, 2015, 105: 151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu F, Pan P. Quasi-static loading and control for structural test (in Chinese). China Civil Eng J, 2002, 35: 1–5,10

    Google Scholar 

  23. US Department of Defense. Unified facilities criteria (UFC): Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. UFC-3-340-02. 2008

  24. US Department of the Army, Navy and the Air Force. Structures to resist the effect of accidental explosions. TM5-1300. 1990

  25. Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Reference manual to minigate potenial terrorist attacks against buildings. FEMA-426, 2003

  26. Woodson S C, Baylot J T. Structural Collapse: Quarter-Scale Model Experiments. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicks-burg MS Structures Lab., 1999

  27. Woodson S C, Baylot J T. Quarter-scale building/column experiments. In: Structures Congress. Philadelphia, 2000

  28. Netherton M D, Stewart M G. Blast load variability and accuracy of blast load prediction models. Int J Protect Struct, 2010, 1: 543–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiśniewski D F, Cruz P J S, Henriques A A R, et al. Probabilistic models for mechanical properties of concrete, reinforcing steel and pre-stressing steel. Struct Infrastr Eng, 2012, 8: 111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee T H, Mosalam K M. Probabilistic fiber element modeling of reinforced concrete structures. Comput Struct, 2004, 82: 2285–2299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hao H, Stewart M G, Li Z X, et al. RC column failure probabilities to blast loads. Int J Protective Struct, 2010, 1: 571–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YanChao Shi.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51878445, 51938011 and 51908405).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Y., Sun, X. & Cui, J. Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete columns under combined seismic and blast loads. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 363–377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2265-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2265-5

Keywords

Navigation