Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the impacts of spatial-temporal variation features of air density on assessing wind power generation and its fluctuation in China

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air density plays an important role in assessing wind resource. Air density significantly fluctuates both spatially and temporally. But literature typically used standard air density or local annual average air density to assess wind resource. The present study investigates the estimation errors of the potential and fluctuation of wind resource caused by neglecting the spatial-temporal variation features of air density in China. The air density at 100 m height is accurately calculated by using air temperature, pressure, and humidity. The spatial-temporal variation features of air density are firstly analyzed. Then the wind power generation is modeled based on a 1.5 MW wind turbine model by using the actual air density, standard air density ρst, and local annual average air density ρsite, respectively. Using ρst overestimates the annual wind energy production (AEP) in 93.6% of the study area. Humidity significantly affects AEP in central and southern China areas. In more than 75% of the study area, the winter to summer differences in AEP are underestimated, but the intra-day peak-valley differences and fluctuation rate of wind power are overestimated. Using ρsite significantly reduces the estimation error in AEP. But AEP is still overestimated (0–8.6%) in summer and underestimated (0–11.2%) in winter. Except for southwest China, it is hard to reduce the estimation errors of winter to summer differences in AEP by using ρsite. Using ρsite distinctly reduces the estimation errors of intra-day peak-valley differences and fluctuation rate of wind power, but these estimation errors cannot be ignored as well. The impacts of air density on assessing wind resource are almost independent of the wind turbine types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mallapaty S. How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century. Nature, 2020, 586: 482–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Energy Administration. The cumulative installed capacity of wind power has broken through 300 GW. http://www.nea.gov.cn/2021-11/30/c_1310343188.htm, 2022-03-21

  3. Jin Y, Scherer L, Sutanudjaja E H, et al. Climate change and CCS increase the water vulnerability of China’s thermoelectric power fleet. Energy, 2022, 245: 123339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Archer C L, Jacobson M Z. Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements. J Geophys Res, 2003, 108: 4289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng C, Xiao Z, Peng Y, et al. Rezoning global offshore wind energy resources. Renew Energy, 2018, 129: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li J, Wang X, Yu X B. Use of spatio-temporal calibrated wind shear model to improve accuracy of wind resource assessment. Appl Energy, 2018, 213: 469–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed A S. Wind resource assessment and economics of electric generation at four locations in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. J Cleaner Product, 2018, 183: 1170–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Gao C Y, Ren J, et al. Wind resource potential assessment using a long term tower measurement approach: A case study of Beijing in China. J Cleaner Product, 2018, 174: 917–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahmoodi K, Saybani M, Azad S T. A temporal and spatial resolution wind and wave power resource assessment in the Oman Gulf. Ocean Eng, 2022, 249: 110881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lima D C A, Soares P M M, Cardoso R M, et al. The present and future offshore wind resource in the Southwestern African region. Clim Dyn, 2021, 56: 1371–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karthikeya B R, Negi P S, Srikanth N. Wind resource assessment for urban renewable energy application in Singapore. Renew Energy 2016, 87: 403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang X Y, Zhao S, Fan B, et al. Micro-scale wind resource assessment in complex terrain based on CFD coupled Measurement from multiple masts. Appl Energy, 2019, 238: 806–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mentis D, Hermann S, Howells M, et al. Assessing the technical wind energy potential in Africa a GIS-based approach. Renew Energy, 2015, 83: 110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nie B, Li J. Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast. Renew Energy, 2018, 128: 391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Olaofe Z O. Review of energy systems deployment and development of offshore wind energy resource map at the coastal regions of Africa. Energy, 2018, 161: 1096–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung C, Schindler D, Laible J. National and global wind resource assessment under six wind turbine installation scenarios. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 156: 403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren G, Wan J, Liu J, et al. Characterization of wind resource in China from a new perspective. Energy, 2019, 167: 994–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saeed M A, Ahmed Z, Hussain S, et al. Wind resource assessment and economic analysis for wind energy development in Pakistan. Sustain Energy Tech, 2021, 44: 101068

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boudia S M, Santos J A. Assessment of large-scale wind resource features in Algeria. Energy, 2019, 189: 116299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arenas-López J P, Badaoui M. Analysis of the offshore wind resource and its economic assessment in two zones of Mexico. Sustain Energy Techn, 2022, 52: 101997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jung C, Schindler D. On the influence of wind speed model resolution on the global technical wind energy potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2022, 156: 112001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Saeed M A, Ahmed Z, Zhang W. Optimal approach for wind resource assessment using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic: A case study for large-scale wind farm in Pakistan. Renew Energy, 2021, 168: 1229–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu X, McElroy M B, Kiviluoma J. Global potential for wind-generated electricity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106: 10933–10938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao J, Guo Z, Guo Y, et al. Wind resource assessment based on numerical simulations and an optimized ensemble system. Energy Convers Manage, 2019, 201: 112164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farkas Z. Considering air density in wind power production. arXiv: 1103.2198

  26. Ulazia A, Nafarrate A, Ibarra-Berastegi G, et al. The consequences of air density variations over northeastern Scotland for offshore wind energy potential. Energies, 2019, 12: 2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ulazia A, Ibarra-Berastegi G, Sáenz J, et al. Seasonal correction of offshore wind energy potential due to air density: Case of the Iberian Peninsula. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 3648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ulazia A, Sáenz J, Ibarra-Berastegi G, et al. Global estimations of wind energy potential considering seasonal air density changes. Energy, 2019, 187: 115938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Akinsanola A A, Ogunjobi K O, Abolude A T, et al. Projected changes in wind speed and wind energy potential over West Africa in CMIP6 models. Environ Res Lett, 2021, 16: 044033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins J, Parkes J, Tindal A. Short term forecasting for utility-scale wind farms—The power model challenge. Wind Eng, 2009, 33: 247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Villena-Ruiz R, Ramirez F J, Honrubia-Escribano A, et al. A technoeconomic analysis of a real wind farm repowering experience: The Malpica case. Energy Convers Manage, 2018, 172: 182–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jung C, Schindler D. The role of air density in wind energy assessment —A case study from Germany. Energy, 2019, 171: 385–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang Y, Ji X, Wu C, et al. Estimation of the influences of air density on wind energy assessment: A case study from China. Energy Convers Manage, 2020, 224: 113371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang Y, Wu C, Ji X, et al. Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network. Energy, 2022, 239: 122210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Floors R, Nielsen M. Estimating air density using observations and re-analysis outputs for wind energy purposes. Energies, 2019, 12: 2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olauson J. ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling? Renew Energ, 2018, 126: 322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Soares P M M, Lima D C A, Nogueira M. Global offshore wind energy resources using the new ERA-5 reanalysis. Environ Res Lett, 2020, 15: 1040a2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gil Ruiz S A, Barriga J E C, Martínez J A. Wind power assessment in the Caribbean region of Colombia, using ten-minute wind observations and ERA5 data. Renew Energy, 2021, 172: 158–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hayes L, Stocks M, Blakers A. Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis. Energy, 2021, 229: 120603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Soukissian T H, Karathanasi F E, Zaragkas D K. Exploiting offshore wind and solar resources in the Mediterranean using ERA5 reanalysis data. Energy Convers Manage, 2021, 237: 114092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu H, Dong L, Yan R, et al. Evaluation of near-surface wind speed climatology and long-term trend over China’s mainland region based on ERA5 reanalysis (in Chinese). Climat Environ Res, 2021, 26: 299–311

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang W, Zhang H, Liang H, et al. On the suitability of ERA5 in hourly GPS precipitable water vapor retrieval over China. J Geod, 2019, 93: 1897–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Picard A, Davis R S, Gläser M, et al. Revised formula for the density of moist air (CIPM-2007). Metrologia, 2008, 45: 149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stull R B. Meteorology for Scientists and Engineers. 3rd ed. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wexler, A. Vapor pressure formulation for water in range 0 to 100°C. A revision. J Res Natl Bur Stand, 1976, 80A: 775–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wexler A. Vapor pressure formulation for ice. J Res Natl Bur Stand, 1977, 81A: 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Daidzic N E. On atmospheric lapse rates. Int J Aviat Aeronaut, 2019, 6: 2

    Google Scholar 

  48. Svenningsen L. Proposal of an improved power curve correction. In: Proceedings of the Poster Presented at European Wind Energy Conference. Warsaw, 2010

  49. Ren G, Wan J, Liu J, et al. Assessing temporal variability of wind resources in China and the spatial correlation of wind power in the selected regions. J Renew Sustain Energy, 2020, 12: 013302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yuan W, Dai P, Xu M, et al. Estimating the impact of global warming on aircraft takeoff performance in China. Atmosphere, 2021, 12: 1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou T, Ren L, Liu H, et al. Impact of 1.5°C and 2.0°C global warming on aircraft takeoff performance in China. Sci Bull, 2018, 63: 700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Held I M, Soden B J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim, 2006, 19: 5686–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Karnauskas K B, Lundquist J K, Zhang L. Southward shift of the global wind energy resource under high carbon dioxide emissions. Nat Geosci, 2018, 11: 38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ohba M. The impact of global warming on wind energy resources and ramp events in Japan. Atmosphere, 2019, 10: 265

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to GuoRui Ren.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52107091), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2022MS017), and the Science and Technology Project of CHINA HUANENG (Offshore wind power and smart energy system, Grant No. HNKJ20-H88).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

11431_2022_2248_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Investigating the impacts of spatial-temporal variation features of air density on assessing wind power generation and its fluctuation in China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, G., Wang, W., Wan, J. et al. Investigating the impacts of spatial-temporal variation features of air density on assessing wind power generation and its fluctuation in China. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 1797–1814 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2248-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2248-4

Keywords

Navigation