Skip to main content
Log in

The active rotary inertia driver system for flutter vibration control of bridges and various promising applications

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active control technology has been investigated and applied in numerous building structures and infrastructures since 1972 when it was firstly introduced into the civil engineering field by Professor JTP Yao. Now, half a century has passed, a variety of control systems have been invented and implemented by researchers and engineers from all over the world. The recent years have witnessed remarkable research attempts and progress devoted to the development in this area based on modern control theory. However, there are still some unknown areas which are worthy of being explored in depth. One of such examples is the application of tuned mass dampers (TMD) to the flutter vibration control of long span bridges. Although applications of TMDs to bridges have been sighted in practice, their genuine effectiveness remains a serious question. The issues relating to how the coupled effect of TMD’s linear force being restricted by the rotational velocity of bridge’s deck during wind excitations which may eventually leads to flutter vibrations, remains unanswered. Such unusual phenomena and limitations were initially discovered and reported by the author sixteen years ago when investigating the barge ship crane hook’s swing motion control. In recent years, the author has invented the active rotary inertia driver (ARID) system which now has been granted patents in China, the US, Europe (including the UK, France, and Germany), Russia, Brazil, India, South Africa, Canada, Australia, Japan and Korean, etc. The ARID is an active control system which could exert direct control torque or moment to the target structures with rotational motions or vibrations natures, including and not limited to buildings, bridges or offshore platforms subjected to winds, earthquakes, and waves excitations. Furthermore, the ARID control system and its methodology can also be applicable to various mechanical systems including but not limited to cranes, vehicles, trains, ships, aircrafts, space crafts, satellites, and robotics. In this paper, the theory, modelling, comprehensive parametric analysis and case study of the ARID system for flutter vibration control of bridges will be discussed, as well as its promising applications in other various occasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frahm H. Device for damping vibrations of bodies. US Patent 989958, 1909-10-30

  2. Den Hartog J P. Mechanical Vibrations. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill: 1956

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ormondroyd J, Den Hartog J P. The theory of the dynamic vibration absorber. Transactions. ASME APM-50-7, 1928-09-22

  4. Cao L, Li C. Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations. Struct Control Health Monit, 2019, 26: e2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casalotti A, Arena A, Lacarbonara W. Mitigation of post-flutter oscillations in suspension bridges by hysteretic tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct, 2014, 69: 62–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xue Q, Zhang J, He J, et al. Control performance and robustness of pounding tuned mass damper for vibration reduction in SDOF structure. Shock Vib, 2016, 2016: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li C, Hao H, Li H, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2016, 16: 1550010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li C, Li H N, Hao H, et al. Seismic fragility analyses of sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges subjected to multi-support ground motions on offshore sites. Eng Struct, 2018, 165: 441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li C, Liu Y, Li H N. Fragility assessment and optimum design of a steel-concrete frame structure with hybrid energy-dissipated devices under multi-hazards of earthquake and wind. Eng Struct, 2021, 245: 112878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cao L, Li C. A high performance hybrid passive base-isolated system. Struct Contr Hlth, 2022, 29: e2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soong T. Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  12. Housner G W, Bergman L A, Caughey T K, et al. Structural control: Past, present, and future. J Eng Mech, 1997, 123: 897–971

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spencer B F Jr, Sain M K. Controlling buildings: A new frontier in feedback. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 1997, 17: 19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ou J. Structural Vibration Control: Active, Semi-Active and Smart Control. Beijing: Science Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spencer B F Jr, Nagarajaiah S. State of the art of structural control. J Struct Eng, 2003, 129: 845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang C, Ou J. Control structure interaction of electromagnetic mass damper system for structural vibration control. J Eng Mech, 2008, 134: 428–437

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang C, Wang H. Swing vibration control of suspended structures using the active rotary inertia driver system: Theoretical modeling and experimental verification. Struct Control Health Monit, 2020, 27: e2543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang C, Ou J. Modeling and dynamical performance of the electromagnetic mass driver system for structural vibration control. Eng Struct, 2015, 82: 93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang C. Control force characteristics of different control strategies for the wind-excited 76-story benchmark building structure. Adv Struct Eng, 2014, 17: 543–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang C, Ou J. Modeling and active control of flexible suspended structural system. In: 7th World Congress on Computational Mechanics. Los Angeles, 2006

  21. Ou J, Zhang C, Li L, et al. Swing motion control of flexible suspended hook structure system. In: 4th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring. San Diego, 2006

  22. Zhang C, Li L, Ou J. Swinging motion control of suspended structures: Principles and applications. Struct Control Health Monit, 2009, 17: 549–562

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang C, Wang H. Robustness of the active rotary inertia driver system for structural swing vibration control subjected to multi-type hazard excitations. Appl Sci, 2019, 9: 4391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiang H, Ge Y. Aerodynamic challenges in span length of suspension bridges. Front Archit Civ Eng China, 2007, 1: 153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li K, Qian G, Ge Y, et al. Control effect and mechanism investigation on the horizontal flow-isolating plate for PI shaped bridge decks’ VIV stability. Wind Struct, 2019, 28: 99–110

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ding Q, Chen A, Xiang H. Coupled buffeting response analysis of long-span bridges by the CQC approach. Struct Eng Mech, 2002, 14: 505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brancaleoni F. The construction phase and its aerodynamic issues. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges. Copenhagen, 1992

  28. Ge Y J, Tanaka H. Aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection. J Struct Eng, 2000, 126: 1404–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhuo L, Liao H, Li M. Flutter control of a streamlined box girder with active flaps. J Vib Control, 2021, 27: 662–674

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhan J, Zhang H, Liu Z, et al. Steady-suction-based flow control of flutter of long-span bridge. Appl Sci, 2020, 10: 1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon S D, Park K S. Suppression of bridge flutter using tuned mass dampers based on robust performance design. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2004, 92: 919–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gu M. Control of wind-induced vibration of long-span bridges and tall buildings. Front Archit Civ Eng China, 2007, 1: 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Körlin R, Starossek U. Wind tunnel test of an active mass damper for bridge decks. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2007, 95: 267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shum K M, Xu Y L, Guo W H. Wind-induced vibration control of long span cable-stayed bridges using multiple pressurized tuned liquid column dampers. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2008, 96: 166–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nariman N A. Control efficiency optimization and Sobol’s sensitivity indices of MTMDs design parameters for buffeting and flutter vibrations in a cable stayed bridge. Front Struct Civ Eng, 2017, 11: 66–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liao H, Li M, Ma C, et al. Research progress of bridge wind engineering in 2020 (in Chinese). J Civil Environ Eng, 2021, 43: 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li C. Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on DDMF and ADMF. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2002, 31: 897–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChunWei Zhang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2019YFE0112400), the Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (Grant No. 2021CXGC011204), and Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Safety and Protection for Infrastructure Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C. The active rotary inertia driver system for flutter vibration control of bridges and various promising applications. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 390–405 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2228-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2228-0

Keywords

Navigation