Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and experimental studies on unsupervised deep Lagrangian learning based rotor balancing method

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rotor balancing is essential to rotor dynamic analysis. To make the balancing process convenient and costless, a balancing method using unsupervised deep Lagrangian network without weight trail is proposed. In the proposed network, a Lagrangian layer is applied to the network to introduce the physical prior knowledge. Compared to traditional balancing method, trail weight process is not necessary. Meanwhile, parameter sharing mechanics in baseline design or Lagrangian layer are applied to identify the unbalanced force without labeled data. Both numerical case study and corresponding experiment are conducted to validate the method. Both experimental and numerical results find that the proposed rotor balancing approach gives reasonable and comparative results with the considerations of both cost and accuracy. Compared with the baseline, to which no physical prior is applied, the balancing method with Lagrangian mechanism involved could achieve better performance. This proposed rotor dynamic balancing method gives out an alternative approach of rotor balancing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yao J, Yang F, Su Y, et al. Balancing optimization of a multiple speeds flexible rotor. J Sound Vib, 2020, 480: 115405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu J H, Jiao C X, Zou D L, et al. Study on the dynamic behavior of herringbone gear structure of marine propulsion system powered by double-cylinder turbines. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 611–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao Y, Li F, Cao J, et al. Calibration of a hub dynamic balancing machine based on the least squares method and systematic error analysis. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 178746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ranjan G, Tiwari R. On-site high-speed balancing of flexible rotor-bearing system using virtual trial unbalances at slow run. Int J Mech Sci, 2020, 183: 105786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang S, Zhang Z. Online measuring and estimating methods for the unbalancing vector of thin-disc workpiece based on the adaptive influence coefficient. J Vib Control, 2021, 27: 1753–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop R E D, Gladwell G M L. The vibration and balancing of an unbalanced flexible rotor. J Mech Eng Sci, 1959, 1: 66–77

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bishop R E D, Parkinson A G. On the use of balancing machines for flexible rotors. J Eng Ind, 1972, 94: 561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman T P. A least-squares method for computing balance corrections. J Eng Ind, 1964, 86: 273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lund J W, Tonnesen J. Analysis and experiments on multi-plane balancing of a flexible rotor. J Eng Ind, 1972, 94: 233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao S, Ren X, Deng W, et al. A transient characteristic-based balancing method of rotor system without trail weights. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 148: 107117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Untaroiu C D, Allaire P E, Foiles W C. Balancing of flexible rotors using convex optimization techniques: Optimum min-max LMI influence coefficient balancing. J Vib Acoust, 2008, 130: 021006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X. SQP algorithms in balancing rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2007, 21: 1469–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Messager T, Pyrz M. Discrete optimization of rigid rotor balancing. J Mech Sci Technol, 2013, 27: 2231–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kang Y, Lin T W, Chang Y J, et al. Optimal balancing of flexible rotors by minimizing the condition number of influence coefficients. Mech Mach Theory, 2008, 43: 891–908

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Li G, Lin Z, Allaire P E. Robust optimal balancing of high-speed machinery using convex optimization. J Vib Acoust, 2008, 130: 031008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Z X, Zhang Q, Li X L, et al. The whole-beat correlation method for the identification of an unbalance response of a dual-rotor system with a slight rotating speed difference. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2011, 25: 1667–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z X, Wang L Z, Jin Z J, et al. Non-whole beat correlation method for the identification of an unbalance response of a dual-rotor system with a slight rotating speed difference. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2013, 39: 452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tresser S, Dolev A, Bucher I. Dynamic balancing of super-critical rotating structures using slow-speed data via parametric excitation. J Sound Vib, 2018, 415: 59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khulief Y A, Oke W, Mohiuddin M A. Modally tuned influence coefficients for low-speed balancing of flexible rotors. J Vib Acoust, 2014, 136: 024501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deepthikumar M B, Sekhar A S, Srikanthan M R. Modal balancing of flexible rotors with bow and distributed unbalance. J Sound Vib, 2013, 332: 6216–6233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Villafane Saldarriaga M, Steffen Jr V, Der Hagopian J, et al. On the balancing of flexible rotating machines by using an inverse problem approach. J Vib Control, 2011, 17: 1021–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han D J. Generalized modal balancing for non-isotropic rotor systems. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2007, 21: 2137–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li X, Zheng L, Liu Z. Balancing of flexible rotors without trial weights based on finite element modal analysis. J Vib Control, 2013, 19: 461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yue C, Ren X, Yang Y, et al. Unbalance identification of speed-variant rotary machinery without phase angle measurement. Shock Vib, 2015, 2015: 934231

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li K, Peng C, Deng Z, et al. Field dynamic balancing for active magnetic bearings supporting rigid rotor shaft based on extended state observer. Mech Syst Signal Process, 2021, 158: 107801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng S, Wang C. Rotor balancing for magnetically levitated TMPs integrated with vibration self-sensing of magnetic bearings. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron, 2021, 26: 3031–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duan P H, Xie Z J, Kang X D, et al. Self-supervised learning-based oil spill detection of hyperspectral images. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 793–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen T, Dong Y L, He D X, et al. Online identification of time-varying dynamical systems for industrial robots based on sparse Bayesian learning. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 386–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ting J A, Mistry M N, Peters J, et al. A Bayesian approach to nonlinear parameter identification for rigid body dynamics. In: Robotics: Science and Systems. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2006. 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  30. Atkeson C G, An C H, Hollerbach J M. Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loads and links. Int J Robot Res, 1986, 5: 101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Haruno M, Wolpert D M, Kawato M. MOSAIC model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput, 2001, 13: 2201–2220

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Calinon S, D’halluin F, Sauser E, et al. Learning and reproduction of gestures by imitation. IEEE Robot Automat Mag, 2010, 17: 44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ledezma F, Haddadin S. First-order-principles-based constructive network topologies: An application to robot inverse dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids). Birmingham: IEEE, 2017. 438–445

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang W, Li X, Ma H, et al. Federated learning for machinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision. Knowledge-Based Syst, 2021, 213: 106679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang W, Li X, Li X. Deep learning-based prognostic approach for lithium-ion batteries with adaptive time-series prediction and on-line validation. Measurement, 2020, 164: 108052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ding B, Wu J, Chuang S, et al. Sparsity-assisted intelligent condition monitoring method for aero-engine main shaft bearing. Trans Nanjing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut, 2020, 37: 508–516

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao Z, Li T, An B, et al. Model-driven deep unrolling: Towards interpretable deep learning against noise attacks for intelligent fault diagnosis. ISA Trans, 2022, 129: 644–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lutter M, Listmann K, Peters J. Deep lagrangian networks for end-to-end learning of energy-based control for under-actuated systems. arxiv: 1907.04489

  39. Zhong S, Li L, Chen H, et al. A novel balancing method for rotor using unsupervised deep learning. Shock Vib, 2021, 2021: 1800164

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chen H, Zhong S, Lu Z, et al. Analysis on multi-mode nonlinear resonance and jump behavior of an asymmetric rolling bearing rotor. Arch Appl Mech, 2021, 91: 2991–3009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Hou.

Additional information

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at tech.scichina.com and link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11972129, 11502161, and 11902184), and National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (Grant No. 2017-IV-0008-0045).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, S., Hou, L. Numerical and experimental studies on unsupervised deep Lagrangian learning based rotor balancing method. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 1050–1061 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2102-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2102-3

Navigation