Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pilot multi-axis control behavior modeling of receivers in probe-and-drogue aerial refueling

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probe-and-drogue aerial refueling (PDR) task is seriously disturbed by the wind field, so it is difficult to obtain accurate visual information of the probe and drogue position. Additionally, the pilot needs to control the vertical, lateral and forward-backward positions of the receiver through the stick and throttle lever, and the pitch and roll manipulation actions of the stick should be reasonably distributed. To simulate the behavior of the pilot’s visual perception and the stick manipulation allocation in the PDR task, three modules are designed, including the visual information acquisition module (VIAM), strategy switching module (SSM) and pilot control and action module (CAM). Based on the coherence function analysis of the flight simulation test data, it is proven that the pilot’s multi-axis control behavior can be decoupled, and the flight states to be controlled are determined. Finally, the established multi-axis receiver pilot model (EPM) is developed. Combined with the motion models of the receiver, the tanker and the refueling equipment, a PDR flight task simulation model is established, and the evaluation indicators for the receiver’s flight performance during the PDR task, such as capture time and settling time, are proposed. The PDR flight simulation model was used to build the ground-based flight simulation test platform, and the flight simulation test of the PDR task was carried out. A comparison between the flight simulation test data and the numerical simulation results shows that the calculation error is less than 10%, which verifies the correctness of the established pilot model. The pilot model can be used to evaluate the design scheme of the refueling equipment and the receiver flight control law and provide a theoretical reference for the flight test design of the PDR task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luo D L, Shao J, Xu Y, et al. Docking navigation method for UAV autonomous aerial refueling. Sci China Inf Sci, 2019, 62: 010203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klyde D H, Aponso B L, Mitchell D G, et al. Development of demonstration maneuvers for aircraft handling qualities evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. New Orleans, 1997. 485–495

  3. Duan H B, Li H, Luo Q N, et al. A binocular vision-based UAVs autonomous aerial refueling platform. Sci China Inf Sci, 2016, 59: 053201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yue T, Zhang Q, Yin H P, et al. Suggested closed-loop response characteristics for tanker in aerial refueling via mission-oriented evaluation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 490–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Duan H B. Verification of monocular and binocular pose estimation algorithms in vision-based UAVs autonomous aerial refueling system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2016, 59: 1730–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas P R, Bhandari U, Bullock S, et al. Advances in air to air refuelling. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2014, 71: 14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He Q, Wang H, Chen Y, et al. Command filtered backstepping sliding mode control for the hose whipping phenomenon in aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2017, 67: 495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Su Z, Wang H, Yao P, et al. Back-stepping based anti-disturbance flight controller with preview methodology for autonomous aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2017, 61: 95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lone M, Cooke A. Review of pilot models used in aircraft flight dynamics. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2014, 34: 55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Yin H, Guo Y, et al. Closed-loop motion characteristic requirements of receiver aircraft for probe and drogue aerial refueling. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2019, 93: 105293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang L, Yin H, Yang K, et al. Water takeoff performance calculation method for amphibious aircraft based on digital virtual flight. Chin J Aeronautics, 2020, 33: 3082–3091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang L, Zhu Q, Zhang Z, et al. Modeling pilot behaviors based on discrete-time series during carrier-based aircraft landing. J Aircraft, 2016, 53: 1922–1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hess R A. Simplified approach for modelling pilot pursuit control behaviour in multi-loop flight control tasks. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part G-J Aerospace Eng, 2006, 220: 85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu S, Tan W, Efremov AV, et al. Review of control models for human pilot behavior. Annu Rev Control, 2017, 44: 274–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu C, Wang L, Yue T, et al. Longitudinal flying qualities evaluation method for receiver in probe and drogue aerial refueling. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Athens, 2020. 87–92

  16. Hess R A. Obtaining multi-loop pursuit-control pilot models from computer simulation. Proc Institution Mech Engineers Part G-J Aerospace Eng, 2008, 222: 189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen C, Tan W Q, Qu X J, et al. A fuzzy human pilot model of longitudinal control for a carrier landing task. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2018, 54: 453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang C, Yin T, Fu S. Predicating the safety of airport approaches using a cognitive pilot model. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Digital Human Modeling & Applications in Health. Las Vegas, 2013. 126–133

  19. Nguyen L T, Ogburn M E, Gilbert W P, et al. Simulator Study of Stall/Post-Stall Characteristics of a Fighter Airplane with Relaxed Longitudinal Static Stability. NASA Technical Paper, 1979

  20. Guo Y, Yue T, Wang L. Unconventional roll axis response-type nonlinear dynamic inversion flight control law design. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference. Nanjing, 2016. 1085–1090

  21. Wu G, Meng X, Wang F. Improved nonlinear dynamic inversion control for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2018, 78: 734–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller C J. Nonlinear dynamic inversion baseline control law: Architecture and performance predictions. In: Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Portland, 2011

  23. Vassberg J C, Yeh D, Blair A J, et al. Numerical simulations of KC-10 wing-mount aerial refueling hose-drogue dynamics with a reel take-up system. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Orlando, 2003

  24. Rui X, He B, Lu Y, et al. Discrete time transfer matrix method for multibody system dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2005, 14: 317–344

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu L, Sun Y, Huang B, et al. Dynamic modeling and performance analysis of a hose-drogue aerial refueling system based on the Kane equation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Guidance, Navigation & Control Conference. Nanjing, 2016. 759–764

  26. Leitner R M, Estrugo R. Numeric simulation of aerial refueling coupling dynamics in case of hose reel malfunction. In: Proceedings of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies (MST) Conference. Boston, 2013

  27. Yu Z, Qu Y, Zhang Y. Safe control of trailing UAV in close formation flight against actuator fault and wake vortex effect. Aerospace Sci Tech, 2018, 77: 189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dogan A, Blake W, Haag C. Bow wave effect in aerial refueling: Computational analysis and modeling. J Aircraft, 2013, 50: 1856–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai X, Wei Z, Quan Q. Modeling and simulation of bow wave effect in probe and drogue aerial refueling. Chin J Aeronaut, 2016, 29: 448–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dorf R C, Bishop R H. Modern Control System. 13th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmid H P, Bekey G A. Tactile information processing by human operators in control systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, 1978, 8: 860–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Carter G C, Knapp C H, Nuttall A H. Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust, 1973, 21: 337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu S, Tan W, Qu X, et al. Prediction of nonlinear pilot-induced oscillation using an intelligent human pilot model. Chin J Aeronaut, 2019, 32: 2592–2611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan T T, Jiang J, Wang X H, et al. Research on multiple mode conversion technology of carrier-based aircraft landing (in Chinese). Flight Dyn, 2014, 32: 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Song H Y, Li Q, et al. Research on a full envelop controller for an unmanned ducted-fan helicopter based on switching control theory. Sci China Technol Sci, 2019, 62: 1837–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hess R A, Marchesi F. Analytical assessment of flight simulator fidelity using pilot models. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2009, 32: 760–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu C, Liu P, Wang W, et al. Effects of behavioral characteristics of taxi drivers on safety and capacity of signalized intersections. J Cent South Univ, 2014, 21: 4033–4042

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    LiXin Wang, Chang Lu, HaiLiang Liu & Ting Yue

  2. China Flight Test Establishment, Xi’an, 710089, China

    Peng Zhao

Authors
  1. LiXin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chang Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. HaiLiang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ting Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting Yue.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. YWF-21-BJ-J-935).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Lu, C., Zhao, P. et al. Pilot multi-axis control behavior modeling of receivers in probe-and-drogue aerial refueling. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 87–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1915-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1915-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation