Skip to main content
Log in

A hyperbranched polymer-based water-resistant adhesive: Durable underwater adhesion and primer for anchoring anti-fouling hydrogel coating

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct deployment of gluing and achieving durable robust adhesion in water is challenging due to difficulty in repelling interface water. This work reports a novel hyperbranched polymer-based water-resistant adhesive (HBPBA) based on Michael addition reaction of multi-vinyl monomers with dopamine and 3-aminophenylboronic acid. Upon encountering water, the HBPBA forms coacervates whose hydrophobic chains aggregate to displace interface water, and meanwhile the catechols exposing outwards contribute to underwater adhesion. The HBPBA can strongly glue diverse substrates including PTFE, PE, PET, ceramic, Ti and stainless steel. The HBPBA can maintain stable adhesion in different environments, such as tap water, simulated sea water, PBS, and a wide range of pH solutions (pH 2 to 10) for 3 months, supposedly due to the complexation of catechol with boronic acid. Intriguingly, HBPBA film can be bonded to the titanium surface as a primer, which firmly anchors the antifouling PNAGA-PCBAA hydrogel coating through copolymerization of remaining double bonds in HBPBA and NAGA plus CBAA. The PNAGA-PCBAA hydrogel-modified titanium is biocompatible and shows outstanding antifouling ability both in vitro and in vivo. This work proposes a new strategy for creating underwater deployable and water-resistant adhesives that may find promising applications in engineering and biomedical fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Di Bella G, Galtieri G, Pollicino E, et al. Mechanical characterization of adhesive joints with dissimilar substrates for marine applications. Int J Adhes Adhes, 2013, 41: 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sapronov O, Maruschak P, Sotsenko V, et al. Development and use of new polymer adhesives for the restoration of marine equipment units. J Marine Sci Eng, 2020, 8: 527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang C, Zhang L, Chen M, et al. Application of medical adhesive in emergency treatment of head and face injury. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32: 1022–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J, Yuan T, Liu Z. Supramolecular medical antibacterial tissue adhesive prepared based on natural small molecules. Biomater Sci, 2020, 8: 6235–6245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang D, Huang M, Sun D, et al. Selective metallization of glass with improved adhesive layer and optional hydrophobic surface. Colloids Surfs A-Physicochem Eng Aspects, 2021, 616: 126339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horkavcová D, Doubet Q, Lecomte-Nana G L, et al. Development of adhesive, bioactive and antibacterial titania sol-gel coating on titanium substrate by dip-coating technique. Coatings, 2021, 11: 243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y, Wu Y, Wang L, et al. Bio-inspired reversible underwater adhesive. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofman A H, van Hees I A, Yang J, et al. Bioinspired underwater adhesives by using the supramolecular toolbox. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1704640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ditsche P, Summers A P. Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: water makes a difference. Beilstein J Nanotechnol, 2014, 5: 2424–2439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meredith H J, Jenkins C L, Wilker J J. Enhancing the adhesion of a biomimetic polymer yields performance rivaling commercial glues. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 3259–3267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Waite J H. Mussel adhesion-essential footwork. J Exp Biol, 2017, 220: 517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Liu X, Zeng L, et al. Barnacle adhesion: From substrate detection to cement curing. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem, 2017, 44: 204–214

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scott A R. Polymers: Secrets from the deep sea. Nature, 2015, 519: S12–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shafiq Z, Cui J, Pastor-Pérez L, et al. Bioinspired underwater bonding and debonding on demand. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51: 4332–4335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofman, Hees V, Yang J, et al. Bioinspired underwater dhesives by using the supramolecular toolbox. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1704640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Degen G D, Stow P R, Lewis R B, et al. Impact of molecular architecture and adsorption density on adhesion of mussel-inspired surface primers with catechol-cation synergy. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141: 18673–18681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinnaratip R, Bhuiyan M S A, Meyers K, et al. Multifunctional biomedical adhesives. Adv Healthcare Mater, 2019, 8: 1801568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng Q, Chen J, Zeng Z, et al. Adhesive coacervates driven by hydrogen-bonding interaction. Small, 2020, 16: 2004132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dompé M, Cedano-Serrano F J, Heckert O, et al. Thermoresponsive complex coacervate-based underwater adhesive. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1808179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui C, Fan C, Wu Y, et al. Water-triggered hyperbranched polymer universal adhesives: From strong underwater adhesion to rapid sealing hemostasis. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1905761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Narkar A R, Barker B, Clisch M, et al. pH responsive and oxidation resistant wet adhesive based on reversible catechol-boronate complexation. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 5432–5439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dai X, Zhang Y, Gao L, et al. A mechanically strong, highly stable, thermoplastic, and self-healable supramolecular polymer hydrogel. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3566–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Z, Vaisocherová H, Cheng G, et al. Nonfouling behavior of Polycarboxybetaine-Grafted surfaces: Structural and environmental effects. Biomacromolecules, 2008, 9: 2686–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart R J, Ransom T C, Hlady V. Natural underwater adhesives. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys, 2011, 49: 757–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu Z, Fan C, Zhang Q, et al. A self-thickening and self-strengthening strategy for 3D printing high-strength and antiswelling supramolecular polymer hydrogels as meniscus substitutes. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31: 2100462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Cui C, Liu Y, et al. A robust poly(N-acryloyl-2-glycine)-based sponge for rapid hemostasis. Biomater Sci, 2020, 8: 3760–3771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang H, Wu Y, Cui C, et al. Antifouling super water absorbent supramolecular polymer hydrogel as an artificial vitreous Body. Adv Sci, 2018, 5: 1800711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang S, Zhang Y, Wang H, et al. Paintable and rapidly bondable conductive hydrogels as therapeutic cardiac patches. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1704235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Z, Gao Z, Wang Y, et al. Eco-friendly, self-healing hydrogels for adhesive and elastic strain sensors, circuit repairing, and flexible electronic devices. Macromolecules, 2019, 52: 2531–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji X, Ahmed M, Long L, et al. Adhesive supramolecular polymeric materials constructed from macrocycle-based host-guest interactions. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 2682–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Veiseh O, Doloff J C, Ma M, et al. Size- and shape-dependent foreign body immune response to materials implanted in rodents and nonhuman primates. Nat Mater, 2015, 14: 643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Narayanan A, Kaur S, Peng C, et al. Viscosity attunes the adhesion of bioinspired low modulus polyester adhesive sealants to wet tissues. Biomacromolecules, 2019, 20: 2577–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu Y, Liu Q, Narayanan A, et al. Mussel-inspired polyesters with aliphatic pendant groups demonstrate the importance of hydrophobicity in underwater adhesion. Adv Mater Interfaces, 2017, 4: 1700506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang J, Bai R, Chen B, et al. Hydrogel adhesion: A supramolecular synergy of chemistry, topology, and mechanics. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 1901693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang J, Bai R, Suo Z. Topological adhesion of wet materials. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1800671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kan Y, Danner E W, Israelachvili J N, et al. Boronate complex formation with dopa containing mussel adhesive protein retards pH-induced oxidation and enables adhesion to mica. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9: e108869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Giselbrecht S, Rapp B E, Niemeyer C M. The chemistry of cyborgs-Interfacing technical devices with organisms. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2013, 52: 13942–13957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kornowski R, Hong M K, Tio F O, et al. In-stent restenosis: Contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am College Cardiology, 1998, 31: 224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hasan J, Crawford R J, Ivanova E P. Antibacterial surfaces: the quest for a new generation of biomaterials. Trends Biotech, 2013, 31: 295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo S, Zhu X, Loh X J. Controlling cell adhesion using layer-by-layer approaches for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng-C, 2017, 70: 1163–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang W, Zhou F. Polymer brushes for antibiofouling and lubrication. BioSurf BioTribol, 2017, 3: 97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Prucker O, Brandstetter T, Rühe J. Surface-attached hydrogel coatings via C,H-insertion crosslinking for biomedical and bioanalytical applications (Review). Biointerphases, 2017, 13: 010801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li J, Celiz A D, Yang J, et al. Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces. Science, 2017, 357: 378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saha S, Kumar R, Pramanik K, et al. Interaction of osteoblast-TiO2 nanotubes in vitro: The combinatorial effect of surface topography and other physico-chemical factors governs the cell fate. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 449: 152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Aguiari P, Iop L, Favaretto F, et al. In vitro comparative assessment of decellularized bovine pericardial patches and commercial bioprosthetic heart valves. Biomed Mater, 2017, 12: 015021

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WenGuang Liu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2018YFA0703100), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51733006).

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at https://tech.scichina.com and https://link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supporting information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Cui, C., Sun, Y. et al. A hyperbranched polymer-based water-resistant adhesive: Durable underwater adhesion and primer for anchoring anti-fouling hydrogel coating. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 65, 201–213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1850-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1850-7

Keywords

Navigation