Skip to main content
Log in

In-situ neutralize methane emission from landfills in loess regions using leachate

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In loess regions, landfilling is the predominant solid waste disposal and loess is usually used as landfill cover soil. However, the methane (CH4) bio-oxidation activity of virgin loess is usually below 0.01 µmol/(h g-soil). In this study, we proposed a method to improve CH4 removal capacity of loess by amelioration with mature landfill leachate, which is in-situ, easily available, and appropriate. The organic matter content of the ameliorated loess increased by 180%, reaching 19.69–24.88 g/kg-soil, with more than 90% being non-leachable. The abundance of type I methane-oxidizing bacteria and methane monooxygenase gene pmoA increased by 5.0 and 79 times, respectively. Consequently, the maximum CH4 removal rate of ameliorated loess reached 0.74–1.41 µmol/(h g-soil) at 25°C, which was 4-fold higher than that of water-irrigated loess. Besides, the CH4 removal rate peaked at 10 vt% CH4 concentration and remained at around 1.4 µmol/(h g-soil) at 15°C–35°C. The column test confirmed that the highest CH4 removal efficiency was at 30–10 cm below the surface, reaching 26.1%±0.4%, and the 50-cm-thick loess layer irrigated with leachate achieved more than 85% CH4 removal efficiency. These results could help to realize carbon neutrality in landfill sites of global loess regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pécsi M. Loess is not just the accumulation of dust. Quaternary Int, 1990, 7–8: 1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng J, Wang S, Wang Q, et al. Distribution and genetic types of loess landslides in China. J Asian Earth Sci, 2019, 170: 329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan J, Feng Y. Estimating potential ecological carrying capacity in Gansu province. Chinese J Ecol, 2017, 36: 800–808

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook (in Chinese). Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ragnauth S A, Creason J, Alsalam J, et al. Global mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gases: Marginal abatement costs curves and abatement potential through 2030. J Integrative Environ Sci, 2015, 12: 155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review. Geochemistry, 2016, 76: 327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Shao M, Zhu Y, et al. Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the loess plateau of China. Agric For Meteor, 2011, 151: 437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whalen S C, Reeburgh W S, Sandbeck K A. Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl Environ MicroBiol, 1990, 56: 3405–3411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang H, He P, Shao L. Methane emissions from msw landfill with sandy soil covers under leachate recirculation and subsurface irrigation. Atmos Environ, 2008, 42: 5579–5588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadasivam B Y, Reddy K R. Landfill methane oxidation in soil and bio-based cover systems: A review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 2014, 13: 79–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Visscher A, Thomas D, Boeckx P, et al. Methane oxidation in simulated landfill cover soil environments. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33: 1854–1859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bender M, Conrad R. Effect of CH4 concentrations and soil conditions on the induction of CH4 oxidation activity. Soil Biol Biochem, 1995, 27: 1517–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Tong T, Chen J, et al. Ammonium impacts methane oxidation and methanotrophic community in freshwater sediment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8: 250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang N, Lü F, He P, et al. Response of methanotrophs and methane oxidation on ammonium application in landfill soils. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2011, 92: 1073–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu C F, Huang Z D. Microbial methane oxidation and gas adsorption capacities of biochar-modified soils. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng, 2020, 6: 24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan X Y, Cai Z C. Advances in the study of roles of soil in methane oxidation (in Chinese). Rural Eco-Environ, 1996, 2: 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H, Yan X, Cai B, et al. The effects of aged refuse and sewage sludge on landfill CH4 oxidation and N2O emissions: Roles of moisture content and temperature. Ecol Eng, 2015, 74: 345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang D, Yang L, Xu W, et al. Enhancement of the methane removal efficiency via aeration for biochar-amended landfill soil cover. Environ Pollution, 2020, 263: 114413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shao L M, He P J, Li G J. In situ nitrogen removal from leachate by bioreactor landfill with limited aeration. Waste Manage, 2008, 28: 1000–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He P J, Xue J F, Shao L M, et al. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) in recycled leachate of bioreactor landfill. Water Res, 2006, 40: 1465–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou H, Chen C, Wang D, et al. Effect of long-term organic amendments on the full-range soil water retention characteristics of a vertisol. Soil Tillage Res, 2020, 202: 104663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lü F, He P, Guo M, et al. Ammonium-dependent regulation of aerobic methane-consuming bacteria in landfill cover soil by leachate irrigation. J Environ Sci, 2012, 24: 711–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiemchaisri C, Chiemchaisri W, Chittanukul K, et al. Effect of leachate irrigation on methane oxidation in tropical landfill cover soil. J Mater Cycle Waste Manag, 2010, 12: 161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Watzinger A, Stemmer M, Pfeffer M, et al. Methanotrophic communities in a landfill cover soil as revealed by [13C] PLFAs and respiratory quinones: Impact of high methane addition and landfill leachate irrigation. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40: 751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, et al. Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the loess plateau. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 97: 40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jin Z, Guo L, Wang Y, et al. Valley reshaping and damming induce water table rise and soil salinization on the chinese loess plateau. Geoderma, 2019, 339: 115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan C H, Zhang Y C, He L, et al. Effect of straw incorporation on three-dimensional fluorescence spectrum of dissolved organic matter in arid loess (in Chinese). Spectrosc Spect Anal, 2013, 33: 1820–1823

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xie J Y, Wang Z H, Li S X. Effects of straw and plastic-film mulching on soil micro-bioactivity and organic carbon and nitrogen in northwest dryland areas of China (in Chinese). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30: 6781–6786

    Google Scholar 

  29. Amor C, De Torres-Socías E, Peres J A, et al. Mature landfill leachate treatment by coagulation/flocculation combined with fenton and solar photo-fenton processes. J Hazard Mater, 2015, 286: 261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hao Y, Wang T, Wang J. Structural properties of unsaturated compacted loess for various sample moisture contents. Arab J Geosci, 2019, 12: 258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen C, Zhang D, Zhang J. Influence of stress and water content on air permeability of intact loess. Can Geotech J, 2017, 54: 1221–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lü F, Liu Y, Shao L, et al. Powdered biochar doubled microbial growth in anaerobic digestion of oil. Appl Energy, 2019, 247: 605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Griffiths R I, Whiteley A S, O’Donnell A G, et al. Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2000, 66: 5488–5491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bolyen E, Rideout J R, Dillon M R, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using qiime 2. Nat Biotechnol, 2019, 37: 852–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, et al. Silva: A comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with arb. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007, 35: 7188–7196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. López-Gutiérrez J C, Henry S, Hallet S, et al. Quantification of a novel group of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the environment by real-time PCR. J MicroBiol Methods, 2004, 57: 399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kemnitz D, Kolb S, Conrad R. High abundance of crenarchaeota in a temperate acidic forest soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2007, 60: 442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kolb S, Knief C, Stubner S, et al. Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA-targeted real-time PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003, 69: 2423–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. De Corte D, Yokokawa T, Varela M M, et al. Spatial distribution of bacteria and archaea and amoA gene copy numbers throughout the water column of the eastern mediterranean sea. ISME J, 2009, 3: 147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reddy K R, Rai R K, Green S J, et al. Effect of temperature on methane oxidation and community composition in landfill cover soil. J Industrial Microbiol Biotech, 2019, 46: 1283–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sadasivam B Y, Reddy K R. Adsorption and transport of methane in landfill cover soil amended with waste-wood biochars. J Environ Manage, 2015, 158: 11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abujabhah I S, Bound S A, Doyle R, et al. Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2016, 98: 243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 2015, 528: 60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng H, Zhang D, Huang B, et al. Organic fertilizer improves soil fertility and restores the bacterial community after 1,3-dichloropropene fumigation. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 738: 140345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bian R, Shi W, Duan Y, et al. Effect of soil types and ammonia concentrations on the contribution of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria to CH4 oxidation. Waste Manag Res, 2019, 37: 698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Long Y Y, Liao Y, Miao J Y, et al. Effects of ammonia on methane oxidation in landfill cover materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2014, 21: 911–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor A E, Zeglin L H, Wanzek T A, et al. Dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria populations and contributions to soil nitrification potentials. ISME J, 2012, 6: 2024–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Verhamme D T, Prosser J I, Nicol G W. Ammonia concentration determines differential growth of ammonia-oxidising archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. ISME J, 2011, 5: 1067–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ouyang Y, Norton J M, Stark J M, et al. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are more responsive than archaea to nitrogen source in an agricultural soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 96: 4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Anthony K M W, Anthony P, Grosse G, et al. Geologic methane seeps along boundaries of arctic permafrost thaw and melting glaciers. Nat Geosci, 2012, 5: 419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tate K R. Soil methane oxidation and land-use change — from process to mitigation. Soil Biol Biochem, 2015, 80: 260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hernandez M E, Beck D A C, Lidstrom M E, et al. Oxygen availability is a major factor in determining the composition of microbial communities involved in methane oxidation. PeerJ, 2015, 3: e801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. He R, Wang J, Xia F F, et al. Evaluation of methane oxidation activity in waste biocover soil during landfill stabilization. Chemosphere, 2012, 89: 672–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barlaz M A, Green R B, Chanton J P, et al. Evaluation of a biologically active cover for mitigation of landfill gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38: 4891–4899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee E H, Moon K E, Cho K S. Long-term performance and bacterial community dynamics in biocovers for mitigating methane and malodorous gases. J Biotech, 2017, 242: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Reddy K R, Rai R K, Green S J, et al. Effect of pH on methane oxidation and community composition in landfill cover soil. J Environ Eng, 2020, 146: 04020037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhan L T, Wu T, Feng S, et al. Full-scale experimental study of methane emission in a loess-gravel capillary barrier cover under different seasons. Waste Manage, 2020, 107: 54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. WMO. WMO greenhouse gas bulletin No.12. World Meteorological Organization, 2016. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php7explnum_id=3084

  59. Goldsmith Jr. C D, Chanton J, Abichou T, et al. Methane emissions from 20 landfills across the united states using vertical radial plume mapping. J Air Waste Manage Association, 2012, 62: 183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Lu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1903700), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41877537).

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, P., Chen, J., Shao, L. et al. In-situ neutralize methane emission from landfills in loess regions using leachate. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 1500–1512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1819-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1819-2

Keywords

Navigation