Skip to main content
Log in

An improved modeling of precipitation phase and snow in the Lancang River Basin in Southwest China

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precipitation phase (e.g., rainfall and snowfall) and snow (e.g., snowpack and snowmelt runoff) in high-mountain regions may largely affect runoff generation, which is critical to water supply, hydropower generation, agricultural irrigation, and ecosystems downstream. Accurately modeling precipitation phase and snow is therefore fundamental to developing a better understanding of hydrological processes for high-mountain regions and their lower reaches. The Lancang River (LR, or the Upper Mekong River) in China, among the most important transboundary rivers originating from the Tibetan Plateau, features active dam construction and complex water resources allocation of various stakeholders in Southeast Asian countries under climate change. This study aims to improve precipitation phase and snow modeling for the LR basin with a hydrological model and multisource remotely sensed data. Results show that joint use of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land surface temperature product with high spatial resolution (1 km×1 km) and an air temperature product can more precisely distinguish precipitation phase than air and wet-bulb temperature products in the LR basin. Snowfall and snowmelt were found to be controlled primarily by rainfall and snowfall temperature thresholds in snow modeling. The rainfall and snowfall temperature thresholds derived from the hydrological model through calibration with remotely sensed snowpack at basin scales were considerably lower than those derived from in situ observations. Rainfall and snowfall temperature thresholds derived from in situ observations could lead to the overestimation of snowmelt runoff due mostly to the lack of representation of point-based measurements at basin scales. This study serves as a basis for better modeling and predicting snow for the LR basin and potentially other similar basins globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parry M L, Canziani O F, Palutikof J P, et al. IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Immerzeel W W, Droogers P, de Jong S M, et al. Large-scale monitoring of snow cover and runoff simulation in Himalayan river basins using remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ, 2009, 113: 40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeelani G, Feddema J J, van der Veen C J, et al. Role of snow and glacier melt in controlling river hydrology in Liddar watershed (western Himalaya) under current and future climate. Water Resour Res, 2012, 48: e2011WR011590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Immerzeel W W, van Beek L P H, Bierkens M F P. Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science, 2010, 328: 1382–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson J R, Green A J, Kingston D G. Potential evapotranspiration-related uncertainty in climate change impacts on river flow: An assessment for the Mekong River basin. J Hydrol, 2014, 510: 259–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoang L P, Lauri H, Kummu M, et al. Mekong River flow and hydrological extremes under climate change. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2016, 20: 3027–3041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang W, Lu H, Yang D, et al. Modelling hydrologic processes in the Mekong River Basin using a distributed model driven by satellite precipitation and rain gauge observations. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11: e0152229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoanh C T, Guttman H, Droogers P, et al. Water, climate, food, and environment in the Mekong basin in southeast Asia: Contribution to the project ADAPT: Adaptation strategies to changing environments. Final report. Colombo: International Water Management Institute, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz A F, Immerzeel W W, Shrestha A B, et al. Consistent increase in High Asia’s runoff due to increasing glacier melt and precipitation. Nat Clim Change, 2014, 4: 587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Su F, Zhang L, Ou T, et al. Hydrological response to future climate changes for the major upstream river basins in the Tibetan Plateau. glob Planet Change, 2016, 136: 82–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moradkhani H, Hsu K L, Gupta H, et al. Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter. Water Resour Res, 2005, 41: e2004WR003604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parajka J, Blöschl G. Spatio-temporal combination of MODIS images: Potential for snow cover mapping. Water Resour Res, 2008, 44: W03406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Famiglietti J S, Cazenave A, Eicker A, et al. Satellites provide the big picture. Science, 2015, 349: 684–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Q, Li X D, Han P F, et al. Validation and application of water levels derived from Sentinel-3A for the Brahmaputra River. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 1760–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandt W T, Bormann K J, Cannon F, et al. Quantifying the spatial variability of a snowstorm using differential airborne lidar. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e2019WR025331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Long D, Han Z, et al. Evapotranspiration estimation for tibetan plateau headwaters using conjoint terrestrial and atmospheric water balances and multisource remote sensing. Water Resour Res, 2019, 55: 8608–8630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun Z, Long D, Yang W, et al. Reconstruction of GRACE data on changes in total water storage over the global land surface and 60 basins. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e26250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Q, Long D, Du M, et al. Daily continuous river discharge estimation for ungauged basins using a hydrologic model calibrated by satellite altimetry: Implications for the SWOT mission. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e27309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Long D, Huang Q, et al. High-temporal-resolution water level and storage change data sets for lakes on the Tibetan Plateau during 2000–2017 using multiple altimetric missions and Landsat-derived lake shoreline positions. Earth Syst Sci Data, 2019, 11: 1603–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abushandi E, Merkel B. Modelling rainfall runoff relations using HEC-HMS and IHACRES for a single rain event in an arid region of Jordan. Water Resour Manage, 2013, 27: 2391–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshimoto S, Amarnath G. Applications of satellite-based rainfall estimates in flood inundation modeling—A case study in Mundeni Aru River Basin, Sri Lanka. Remote Sens, 2017, 9: 998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bui H T, Ishidaira H, Shaowei N. Evaluation of the use of global satellite-gauge and satellite-only precipitation products in stream flow simulations. Appl Water Sci, 2019, 9: 53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hock R. Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J Hydrol, 2003, 282: 104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harpold A A, Kaplan M L, Zion Klos P, et al. Rain or snow: Hydrologic processes, observations, prediction, and research needs. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2017, 21: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang G, Wen Y, Gao J, et al. Similarities and differences between three coexisting spaceborne radars in global rainfall and snowfall estimation. Water Resour Res, 2017, 53: 3835–3853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kulie M S, Milani L, Wood N B, et al. A shallow cumuliform snowfall census using spaceborne radar. J Hydrometeorol, 2016, 17: 1261–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinec J, Rango A, Major E. The Snowmelt-Runoff Model (SRM) User’s Manual. 1983

  28. Mitchell K. The community Noah land-surface model (LSM). User’s Guide. ftp://ftp.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/gcp/ldas/noahlsm/ver_2

  29. Bergström S. The HBV model: Its structure and applications. Report. Norrköping: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson E. Snow accumulation and ablation model-SNOW-17. Report. Maryland: National Weather Service River Forecast System, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marks D, Winstral A, Reba M, et al. An evaluation of methods for determining during-storm precipitation phase and the rain/snow transition elevation at the surface in a mountain basin. Adv Water Resources, 2013, 55: 98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding B, Yang K, Qin J, et al. The dependence of precipitation types on surface elevation and meteorological conditions and its parameterization. J Hydrol, 2014, 513: 154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen X, Long D, Hong Y, et al. Improved modeling of snow and glacier melting by a progressive two-stage calibration strategy with GRACE and multisource data: How snow and glacier meltwater contributes to the runoff of the Upper Brahmaputra River basin? Water Resour Res, 2017, 53: 2431–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta H V, Sorooshian S, Yapo P O. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res, 1998, 34: 751–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dembélé M, Hrachowitz M, Savenije H H G, et al. Improving the predictive skill of a distributed hydrological model by calibration on spatial patterns with multiple satellite data sets. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e26085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tekeli A E, Akyürek Z, Arda Şorman A, et al. Using MODIS snow cover maps in modeling snowmelt runoff process in the eastern part of Turkey. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 97: 216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Steele C, Dialesandro J, James D, et al. Evaluating MODIS snow products for modelling snowmelt runoff: Case study of the Rio Grande headwaters. Int J Appl Earth Observation GeoInf, 2017, 63: 234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang J, Li H, Hao X. Responses of snowmelt runoff to climatic change in an inland river basin, Northwestern China, over the past 50 years. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2010, 14: 1979–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson M T, Ramage J, Troy T J, et al. Snowmelt detection with calibrated, enhanced-resolution brightness temperatures (CETB) in colorado watersheds. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e24542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Debeer C M, Pomeroy J W. Simulation of the snowmelt runoff contributing area in a small alpine basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2010, 14: 1205–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stigter E E, Wanders N, Saloranta T M, et al. Assimilation of snow cover and snow depth into a snow model to estimate snow water equivalent and snowmelt runoff in a Himalayan catchment. Cryosphere, 2017, 11: 1647–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang J, Hong Y, Li L, et al. The coupled routing and excess storage (CREST) distributed hydrological model. Hydrol Sci J, 2011, 56: 84–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Du M, Long D. Development of a Hydrological Model Driven and Calibrated by Multisource Remote Sensing Data in Poorly Gauged Basins. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2018. 1–61

    Google Scholar 

  44. Han Z, Long D, Huang Q, et al. Improving reservoir outflow estimation for ungauged basins using satellite observations and a hydrological model. Water Resour Res, 2020, 56: e27590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shen Y, Xiong A. Validation and comparison of a new gauge-based precipitation analysis over mainland China. Int J Climatol, 2016, 36: 252–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jacobs J W. The Mekong River Commission: Transboundary water resources planning and regional security. Geographical J, 2002, 168: 354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang L, Su F, Yang D, et al. Discharge regime and simulation for the upstream of major rivers over Tibetan Plateau. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2013, 118: 8500–8518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Samaniego L, Kumar R, Attinger S. Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid-based hydrologic model at the mesoscale. Water Resour Res, 2010, 46: W05523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Larsen M A D, Refsgaard J C, Jensen K H, et al. Calibration of a distributed hydrology and land surface model using energy flux measurements. Agric For Meteor, 2016, 217: 74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Han P, Long D, Han Z, et al. Improved understanding of snowmelt runoff from the headwaters of China’s Yangtze River using remotely sensed snow products and hydrological modeling. Remote Sens Environ, 2019, 224: 44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu J, Zhang W, Xia J, et al. Study of degree-day model from 2000 to 2016: The main processes and key issues. J Glaciol Geocryol, 2017, 39: 801–810

    Google Scholar 

  52. Van Tiel M, Teuling A J, Wanders N, et al. The role of glacier changes and threshold definition in the characterisation of future streamflow droughts in glacierised catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2018, 22: 463–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Engelhardt M, Schuler T V, Andreassen L M. Contribution of snow and glacier melt to discharge for highly glacierised catchments in Norway. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2014, 18: 511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao R J. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J Hydrol, 1992, 135: 371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shen X, Hong Y, Zhang K, et al. Refining a distributed linear reservoir routing method to improve performance of the CREST model. J Hydrol Eng, 2016, 22: 04016061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Computat, 2002, 6: 182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kayastha R B, Steiner N, Kayastha R, et al. Comparative study of hydrology and icemelt in three nepal river basins using the glacio-hydrological degree-day model (GDM) and observations from the advanced scatterometer (ASCAT). Front Earth Sci, 2020, 7: 354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Han Z, Long D, Fang Y, et al. Impacts of climate change and human activities on the flow regime of the dammed Lancang River in Southwest China. J Hydrol, 2019, 570: 96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li B, Su H, Chen F, et al. The changing pattern of droughts in the Lancang River Basin during 1960–2005. Theor Appl Climatol, 2013, 111: 401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tang G, Zeng Z, Long D, et al. Statistical and hydrological comparisons between TRMM and GPM level-3 products over a midlatitude basin: Is day-1 IMERG a good successor for TMPA 3B42V7? J Hydrometeorol, 2016, 17: 121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xie P, Yatagai A, Chen M, et al. A gauge-based analysis of daily precipitation over East Asia. J Hydrometeorol, 2007, 8: 607–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ushio T, Sasashige K, Kubota T, et al. A Kalman filter approach to the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) from combined passive microwave and infrared radiometric data. J Meteor Soc Japan, 2009, 87A: 137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bao X, Zhang F. Evaluation of NCEP-CFSR, NCEP-NCAR, ERA-Interim, and ERA-40 reanalysis datasets against independent sounding observations over the Tibetan Plateau. J Clim, 2013, 26: 206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bai L, Long D, Yan L. Estimation of surface soil moisture with downscaled land surface temperatures using a data fusion approach for heterogeneous agricultural land. Water Resour Res, 2019, 55: 1105–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Long D, Yan L, Bai L, et al. Generation of MODIS-like land surface temperatures under all-weather conditions based on a data fusion approach. Remote Sens Environ, 2020, 246: 111863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zeng C, Shen H, Zhong M, et al. Reconstructing MODIS LST based on multitemporal classification and robust regression. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett, 2015, 12: 512–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Duan S B, Li Z L, Wang N, et al. Evaluation of six land-surface diurnal temperature cycle models using clear-sky in situ and satellite data. Remote Sens Environ, 2012, 124: 15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schädlich S, Göttsche F M, Olesen F S. Influence of land surface parameters and atmosphere on METEOSAT brightness temperatures and generation of land surface temperature maps by temporally and spatially interpolating atmospheric correction. Remote Sens Environ, 2001, 75: 39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Yang J, Jiang L, Ménard C B, et al. Evaluation of snow products over the Tibetan Plateau. Hydrol Process, 2015, 29: 3247–3260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Che T, Xin L, Jin R, et al. Snow depth derived from passive microwave remote-sensing data in China. Ann Glaciol, 2008, 49: 145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Dai L, Che T, Ding Y. Inter-calibrating SMMR, SSM/I and SSMI/S data to improve the consistency of snow-depth products in China. Remote Sens, 2015, 7: 7212–7230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dai L, Che T, Wang J, et al. Snow depth and snow water equivalent estimation from AMSR-E data based on a priori snow characteristics in Xinjiang, China. Remote Sens Environ, 2012, 127: 14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Dai L, Che T, Xie H, et al. Estimation of snow depth over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau based on AMSR-E and MODIS data. Remote Sens, 2018, 10: 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Verdin J, Funk C, Senay G, et al. Climate science and famine early warning. Phil Trans R Soc B, 2005, 360: 2155–2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kiem A S, Ishidaira H, Hapuarachchi H P, et al. Future hydroclimatology of the Mekong River basin simulated using the highresolution Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) AGCM. Hydrol Process, 2008, 22: 1382–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Moriasi D N, Arnold J G, Van Liew M W, et al. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE, 2007, 50: 885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Harder P, Pomeroy J. Estimating precipitation phase using a psychrometric energy balance method. Hydrol Process, 2013, 27: 1901–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Dai L, Che T, Ding Y, et al. Evaluation of snow cover and snow depth on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau derived from passive microwave remote sensing. Cryosphere, 2017, 11: 1933–1948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lv Z, Pomeroy J W, Fang X. Evaluation of SNODAS snow water equivalent in Western Canada and assimilation into a cold region hydrological model. Water Resour Res, 2019, 55: 11166–11187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Alder J R, Hostetler S W. The dependence of hydroclimate projections in snow-dominated regions of the Western United States on the choice of statistically downscaled climate data. Water Resour Res, 2019, 55: 2279–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rajagopal S, Harpold A A. Testing and improving temperature thresholds for snow and rain prediction in the Western United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 2016, 52: 1142–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhong K, Zheng F, Xu X, et al. Discriminating the precipitation phase based on different temperature thresholds in the Songhua River Basin, China. Atmos Res, 2018, 205: 48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Liu S, Yan D, Qin T, et al. Precipitation phase separation schemes in the Naqu River basin, eastern Tibetan plateau. Theor Appl Climatol, 2018, 131: 399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Tang G, Ma Y, Long D, et al. Evaluation of GPM Day-1 IMERG and TMPA Version-7 legacy products over Mainland China at multiple spatiotemporal scales. J Hydrol, 2016, 533: 152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Rasmussen R, Liu C, Ikeda K, et al. High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: A process study of current and warmer climate. J Clim, 2011, 24: 3015–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ikeda K, Rasmussen R, Liu C, et al. Simulation of seasonal snowfall over Colorado. Atmos Res, 2010, 97: 462–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wang C, Wang Z, Cui Y. Snow cover of China during the last 40 years: Spatial distribution and interannual variation. J Glaciol Geocryol, 2009, 31: 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zeng H, Li L, Li J. The evaluation of TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) in drought monitoring in the Lancang River Basin. J Geogr Sci, 2012, 22: 273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. He Z, Yang L, Tian F, et al. Intercomparisons of rainfall estimates from TRMM and GPM multisatellite products over the Upper Mekong River Basin. J Hydrometeorol, 2017, 18: 413–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Benali A, Carvalho A C, Nunes J P, et al. Estimating air surface temperature in Portugal using MODIS LST data. Remote Sens Environ, 2012, 124: 108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Colombi A, De Michele C, Pepe M, et al. Estimation of daily mean air temperature from MODIS LST in Alpine areas. EARSeL eProceedings, 2007, 6: 38–46

    Google Scholar 

  92. Jennings K S, Winchell T S, Livneh B, et al. Spatial variation of the rain-snow temperature threshold across the Northern Hemisphere. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Helbig N, van Herwijnen A. Subgrid parameterization for snow depth over mountainous terrain from flat field snow depth. Water Resour Res, 2017, 53: 1444–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Shen Y J, Shen Y, Fink M, et al. Unraveling the hydrology of the glacierized Kaidu Basin by integrating multisource data in the Tianshan Mountains, Northwestern China. Water Resour Res, 2018, 54: 557–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Huning L S, Margulis S A. Climatology of seasonal snowfall accumulation across the Sierra Nevada (USA): Accumulation rates, distributions, and variability. Water Resour Res, 2017, 53: 6033–6049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Long.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51722903, 92047301, 51639005 and 91547210), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFE0196000).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Z., Long, D., Han, P. et al. An improved modeling of precipitation phase and snow in the Lancang River Basin in Southwest China. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 1513–1527 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1788-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1788-4

Keywords

Navigation