Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The nonlinear mechanism for the same responses of neuronal bursting to opposite self-feedback modulations of autapse

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the traditional viewpoint, inhibitory and excitatory effects always induce opposite responses. In the present study, the enhanced bursting activities induced by excitatory autapses, which are consistent with the recent experimental observations, and those induced by inhibitory autapses, which is a paradoxical phenomenon, were simulated using the Chay model. The same bifurcations and different ionic currents for the same responses were acquired with fast-slow variable dissection and current decomposition, respectively. As the inhibitory or excitatory autaptic conductance increased, the ending phase of the burst related to a homoclinic bifurcation of the fast subsystem changed to widen the burst duration to contain more spikes, which was induced by an elevated minimal potential (Vmin) of spiking of the fast subsystem. Larger inhibitory and excitatory autaptic conductances induced smaller and larger maximal potentials (Vmax) of spiking, respectively. During the downstroke, a weaker potassium current induced by the smaller Vmax played a dominant role for the inhibitory autapse, and the stronger potassium current induced by the larger Vmax became weaker due to the opposite autaptic current of the excitatory autapse, which induced the Vmin elevated. The results present the nonlinear and biophysical mechanisms of the same responses to opposite effects, which extends nonlinear dynamics knowledge and provides potential modulation measures for the nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun H A, Wissing H, Schäfer K, et al. Oscillation and noise determine signal transduction in shark multimodal sensory cells. Nature, 1994, 367: 270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbert T, Ray W J, Kowalik Z J, et al. Chaos and physiology: Deterministic chaos in excitable cell assemblies. Physiol Rev, 1994, 74: 1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glass L. Synchronization and rhythmic processes in physiology. Nature, 2001, 410: 277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X J, Gu H G, Guan L N. Stochastic dynamics of conduction failure of action potential along nerve fiber with Hopf bifurcation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rinzel J, Lee Y S. Dissection of a model for neuronal parabolic bursting. J Math Biol, 1987, 25: 653–675

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Izhikevich E M, Desai N S, Walcott E C, et al. Bursts as a unit of neural information: Selective communication via resonance. Trends Neurosciences, 2003, 26: 161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia B, Gu H, Xue L. A basic bifurcation structure from bursting to spiking of injured nerve fibers in a two-dimensional parameter space. Cogn Neurodyn, 2017, 11: 189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Cui Y, Sang K, et al. Ketamine blocks bursting in the lateral habenula to rapidly relieve depression. Nature, 2018, 554: 317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Izhikevich E M. Neural excitability, spiking and bursting. Int J Bifurcation Chaos, 2000, 10: 1171–1266

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Gu H. The distinct stochastic and deterministic dynamics between period-adding and period-doubling bifurcations of neural bursting patterns. Nonlinear Dyn, 2017, 87: 2541–2562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saada R, Miller N, Hurwitz I, et al. Autaptic excitation elicits persistent activity and a plateau potential in a neuron of known behavioral function. Curr Biol, 2009, 19: 479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo D, Chen M, Perc M, et al. Firing regulation of fast-spiking interneurons by autaptic inhibition. EPL, 2016, 114: 30001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mondal A, Upadhyay R K, Ma J, et al. Bifurcation analysis and diverse firing activities of a modified excitable neuron model. Cogn Neurodyn, 2019, 13: 393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldwyn J H, Slabe B R, Travers J B, et al. Gain control with A-type potassium current: IA as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition. PLoS Comput Biol, 2018, 14: e1006292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hörning M, Nakahata M, Linke P, et al. Dynamic mechano-regulation of myoblast cells on supramolecular hydrogels cross-linked by reversible host-guest interactions. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 7660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao Z, Li L, Gu H. Excitatory autapse induces different cases of reduced neuronal firing activities near Hopf bifurcation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2020, 85: 105250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun X, Si H. Population rate coding in recurrent neuronal networks consisting of neurons with mixed excitatory-inhibitory synapses. Nonlinear Dyn, 2020, 100: 2673–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun X, Li G. Synchronization transitions induced by partial time delay in a excitatory-inhibitory coupled neuronal network. Nonlinear Dyn, 2017, 89: 2509–2520

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Perkel D H, Schulman J H, Bullock T H, et al. Pacemaker neurons: Effects of regularly spaced synaptic input. Science, 1964, 145: 61–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Satterlie R A. Reciprocal inhibition and postinhibitory rebound produce reverberation in a locomotor pattern generator. Science, 1985, 229: 402–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Winograd M, Destexhe A, Sanchez-Vives M V. Hyperpolarization-activated graded persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105: 7298–7303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Elgueta C, Kohler J, Bartos M. Persistent discharges in dentate gyrus perisoma-inhibiting interneurons require hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel activation. J Neuroscience, 2015, 35: 4131–4139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao Z, Li L, Gu H. Dynamical mechanism of hyperpolarization-activated non-specific cation current induced resonance and spike-timing precision in a neuronal model. Front Cell Neurosci, 2018, 12

  24. Zhao Z, Li L, Gu H, et al. Different dynamics of repetitive neural spiking induced by inhibitory and excitatory autapses near subcritical Hopf bifurcation. Nonlinear Dyn, 2020, 99: 1129–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guan L, Jia B, Gu H. A novel threshold across which the negative stimulation evokes action potential near a saddle-node bifurcation in a neuronal model with IH current. Int J Bifurcation Chaos, 2019, 29: 1950198

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Dodla R, Rinzel J. Enhanced neuronal response induced by fast inhibition. Phys Rev E, 2006, 73: 010903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dodla R, Svirskis G, Rinzel J. Well-timed, brief inhibition can promote spiking: Postinhibitory facilitation. J NeuroPhysiol, 2006, 95: 2664–2677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beiderbeck B, Myoga M H, Müller N I C, et al. Precisely timed inhibition facilitates action potential firing for spatial coding in the auditory brainstem. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 1771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu F, Gu H, Li Y. Inhibitory electromagnetic induction current induces enhancement instead of reduction of neural bursting activities. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2019, 79: 104924

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu F, Gu H. Bifurcations of negative responses to positive feedback current mediated by memristor in a neuron model with bursting patterns. Int J Bifurcation Chaos, 2020, 30: 2030009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang X J, Rinzel J. Alternating and synchronous rhythms in reciprocally inhibitory model neurons. Neural Computation, 1992, 4: 84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jalil S, Belykh I, Shilnikov A. Fast reciprocal inhibition can synchronize bursting neurons. Phys Rev E, 2010, 81: 045201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Jia B, Wu Y, He D, et al. Dynamics of transitions from anti-phase to multiple in-phase synchronizations in inhibitory coupled bursting neurons. Nonlinear Dyn, 2018, 93: 1599–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Uzuntarla M, Torres J J, Calim A, et al. Synchronization-induced spike termination in networks of bistable neurons. Neural Networks, 2019, 110: 131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cobb S R, Halasy K, Vida I, et al. Synaptic effects of identified interneurons innervating both interneurons and pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience, 1997, 79: 629–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bacci A, Huguenard J R. Enhancement of spike-timing precision by autaptic transmission in neocortical inhibitory interneurons. Neuron, 2006, 49: 119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Der Loos H, Glaser E M. Autapses in neocortex cerebri: Synapses between a pyramidal cell’s axon and its own dendrites. Brain Res, 1972, 48: 355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bekkers J M, Stevens C F. Excitatory and inhibitory autaptic currents in isolated hippocampal neurons maintained in cell culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88: 7834–7838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang M, Zhu J, Liu Y P, et al. Enhancement of asynchronous release from fast-spiking interneuron in human and rat epileptic neocortex. PLoS Biol, 2012, 10: e1001324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin L, Zheng R, Ke W, et al. Autapses enhance bursting and coincidence detection in neocortical pyramidal cells. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 4890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ke W, He Q, Shu Y. Functional self-excitatory autapses (auto-synapses) on neocortical pyramidal cells. Neurosci Bull, 2019, 35: 1106–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bacci A, Huguenard J R, Prince D A. Functional autaptic neurotransmission in fast-spiking interneurons: A novel form of feedback inhibition in the neocortex. J Neurosci, 2003, 23: 859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Y, Schmid G, Hänggi P, et al. Spontaneous spiking in an autaptic Hodgkin-Huxley setup. Phys Rev E, 2010, 82: 061907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Hashemi M, Valizadeh A, Azizi Y. Effect of duration of synaptic activity on spike rate of a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron with delayed feedback. Phys Rev E, 2012, 85: 021917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang H, Ma J, Chen Y, et al. Effect of an autapse on the firing pattern transition in a bursting neuron. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2014, 19: 3242–3254

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang H, Wang L, Chen Y, et al. Effect of autaptic activity on the response of a Hodgkin-Huxley neuron. Chaos, 2014, 24: 033122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Song X L, Wang C N, Ma J, et al. Transition of electric activity of neurons induced by chemical and electric autapses. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 1007–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Guo D, Wu S, Chen M, et al. Regulation of irregular neuronal firing by autaptic transmission. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 26096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Song X, Wang H, Chen Y. Autapse-induced firing patterns transitions in the MorrisCLecar neuron model. Nonlinear Dyn, 2019, 96: 2341–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Qin H X, Ma J, Jin W Y, et al. Dynamics of electric activities in neuron and neurons of network induced by autapses. Sci China Tech Sci, 2014, 57: 936–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Qin H, Wu Y, Wang C, et al. Emitting waves from defects in network with autapses. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 2015, 23: 164–174

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Yilmaz E, Ozer M, Baysal V, et al. Autapse-induced multiple coherence resonance in single neurons and neuronal networks. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 30914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ge M, Xu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Autaptic modulation-induced neuronal electrical activities and wave propagation on network under electromagnetic induction. Eur Phys J Spec Top, 2018, 227: 799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tikidji-Hamburyan R A, Martínez J J, White J A, et al. Resonant interneurons can increase robustness of gamma oscillations. J Neurosci, 2015, 35: 15682–15695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li Y Y, Gu H G, Ding X L. Bifurcations of enhanced neuronal bursting activities induced by the negative current mediated by inhibitory autapse. Nonlinear Dyn, 2019, 97: 2091–2105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ding X L, Jia B, Li Y Y. Explanation to negative feedback inducedenhancement of neural electronic activities with phase response curve (in Chinese). Acta Phys Sin, 2019, 68: 180502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yao C, He Z, Nakano T, et al. Inhibitory-autapse-enhanced signal transmission in neural networks. Nonlinear Dyn, 2019, 97: 1425–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Prescott S A, Koninck Y D, Sejnowski T J. Biophysical basis for three distinct dynamical mechanisms of action potential initiation. PLoS Comput Biol, 2008, 4: e1000198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  59. Drion G, OLeary T, Marder E. Ion channel degeneracy enables robust and tunable neuronal firing rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112: E5361–E5370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chay T R. Chaos in a three-variable model of an excitable cell. Physica D-Nonlinear Phenomena, 1985, 16: 233–242

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Fan Y S, Chay T R. Generation of periodic and chaotic bursting in an excitable cell model. Biol Cybern, 1994, 71: 417–431

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. Jalil S, Belykh I, Shilnikov A. Spikes matter for phase-locked bursting in inhibitory neurons. Phys Rev E, 2012, 85: 036214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Cymbalyuk G S, Gaudry Q, Masino M A, et al. Bursting in leech heart interneurons: Cell-autonomous and network-based mechanisms. J Neurosci, 2002, 22: 10580–10592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ermentrout B. Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Systems: A Guide to XPPAUT for Researchers and Students. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2002

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhou X, Xu Y, Wang G, et al. Ionic channel blockage in stochastic HodgkinCHuxley neuronal model driven by multiple oscillatory signals. Cogn Neurodyn, 2020, 14: 569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang Z, Shi X. Electric activities of time-delay memristive neuron disturbed by Gaussian white noise. Cogn Neurodyn, 2020, 14: 115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cao B, Guan L N, Gu H G. Bifurcation mechanism of not increase but decrease of spike number within a neural burst induced by excitatory effect (in Chinese). Acta Phys Sin, 2018, 67: 240502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhao Z, Li L, Gu H. Different dynamical behaviors induced by slow excitatory feedback for type II and III excitabilities. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 3646

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Chifeng University, Chifeng, 024000, China

    YuYe Li

  2. School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    HuaGuang Gu & Bing Jia

  3. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China

    Bing Jia

  4. Department of Basic Education, Fuyang Institute of Technology, Fuyang, 236031, China

    XueLi Ding

Authors
  1. YuYe Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. HuaGuang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bing Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. XueLi Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HuaGuang Gu.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11762001, 11402055 and 11872276), the Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (Grant No. NJYT-20-A09), and the Program for Excellent Young Talents in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province of China (Grant No. gxyqZD2020077).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Gu, H., Jia, B. et al. The nonlinear mechanism for the same responses of neuronal bursting to opposite self-feedback modulations of autapse. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 64, 1459–1471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1753-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-020-1753-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation